Standards battles for business-to-government data exchange: Identifying success factors for standard dominance using the Best Worst Method

[1]  Jafar Rezaei,et al.  Measuring the relative importance of the logistics performance index indicators using Best Worst Method , 2018, Transport Policy.

[2]  Nitesh Bharosa,et al.  Steering the adoption of standard business reporting for cross domain information exchange , 2018, DG.O.

[3]  Jafar Rezaei,et al.  Evaluating firms' R&D performance using best worst method. , 2018, Evaluation and program planning.

[4]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Urban sewage sludge, sustainability, and transition for Eco-City: Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of technologies based on best-worst method , 2017 .

[5]  Alekhya Anantapantula,et al.  Factors affecting Standard Dominance in the battle between EDIFACT versus XBRL Data Exchange Standards in India , 2017 .

[6]  J. Rezaei,et al.  A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method , 2016 .

[7]  J. Rezaei.  Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model , 2016 .

[8]  H. Gupta,et al.  Identifying enablers of technological innovation for Indian MSMEs using best–worst multi criteria decision making method , 2016 .

[9]  Ali Azarnivand,et al.  Water Scarcity Management in Arid Regions Based on an Extended Multiple Criteria Technique , 2016, Water Resources Management.

[10]  Lori Tavasszy,et al.  Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using Best Worst Method , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Nitesh Bharosa,et al.  Challenging the Chain: Governing the Automated Exchange and Processing of Business Information , 2015 .

[12]  J. Rezaei.  Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method , 2015 .

[13]  L. Parker,et al.  Institutionalising XBRL for financial reporting: resorting to regulation , 2015 .

[14]  Geerten van de Kaa,et al.  Factors for winning format battles: A comparative case study , 2015 .

[15]  J. van den Ende,et al.  Strategies in network industries: the importance of inter-organisational networks, complementary goods, and commitment , 2015 .

[16]  Geerten van de Kaa,et al.  Platform selection for complex systems: Building automation systems , 2014, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering.

[17]  Geerten van de Kaa,et al.  Photovoltaic technology selection: A fuzzy MCDM approach , 2014 .

[18]  Geerten van de Kaa,et al.  Supporting Decision Making in Technology Standards Battles Based on a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[19]  Geerten van de Kaa,et al.  Standards battles in China: opening up the black box of the Chinese government , 2013, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[20]  Charles Hoffman,et al.  Digitizing Financial Reports – Issues and Insights: A Viewpoint , 2013 .

[21]  Brad S. Trinkle,et al.  The Different Levels of XBRL Adoption , 2013 .

[22]  J. van den Ende,et al.  The Paradox of Standard Flexibility: The Effects of Co-evolution between Standard and Interorganizational Network , 2012 .

[23]  S. Gallagher.  The battle of the blue laser DVDs: The significance of corporate strategy in standards battles , 2012 .

[24]  Kurt P. Ramin,et al.  IFRS and XBRL: How to improve Business Reporting through Technology and Object Tracking , 2012 .

[25]  Geerten van de Kaa,et al.  Factors for winning interface format battles: A review and synthesis of the literature , 2011 .

[26]  Nitesh Bharosa,et al.  Transforming Public-Private Networks An XBRL-Based Infrastructure for Transforming Business-to-Government Information Exchange , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[27]  Stuart Tooley,et al.  Functional fixation: Experimental evidence on the presentation of financial information through different digital formats , 2011 .

[28]  Robert G. Eccles,et al.  One Report: Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy , 2010 .

[29]  Arnold Picot,et al.  Information, Organization and Management , 2008 .

[30]  Jarunee Wonglimpiyarat,et al.  Standard competition: Is collaborative strategy necessary in shaping the smart card market? , 2005 .

[31]  Fernando F. Suarez,et al.  The Half-Truth of First-Mover Advantage , 2005, Harvard business review.

[32]  Maria Manuela Cunha,et al.  Virtual Enterprise Integration: Challenges of a New Paradigm , 2005 .

[33]  Fernando F. Suarez.  Battles for Technological Dominance: An Integrative Framework , 2004 .

[34]  M.A. Cusumano,et al.  The elements of platform leadership , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[35]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Technological Leapfrogging: Lessons from the U.S. Video Game Console Industry , 2003 .

[36]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[37]  Scott Gallagher,et al.  Innovation and competition in standard-based industries: a historical analysis of the US home video game market , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[38]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Technology Success and Failure in Winner-Take-All Markets: The Impact of Learning Orientation, Timing, and Network Externalities , 2002 .

[39]  A. Kumaraswamy,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN THE SPONSORSHIP OF COMMON TECHNOLOGICAL STANDARDS: THE CASE OF SUN MICROSYSTEMS AND JAVA * , 2002 .

[40]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Dominance by birthright: entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U. S. , 2000 .

[41]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Winning the standards race:: Building installed base and the availability of complementary goods , 1999 .

[42]  H. Varian,et al.  The Art of Standards Wars , 1999 .

[43]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Technological Lockout: An Integrative Model of the Economic and Strategic Factors Driving Technology Success and Failure , 1998 .

[44]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[45]  C. Hill,et al.  Establishing a standard: Competitive strategy and technological standards in winner-take-all industries , 1997 .

[46]  Fernando F. Suarez,et al.  Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms , 1995 .

[47]  Howard Thomas,et al.  Planning for dominance: a strategic perspective on the emergence of a dominant design , 1995 .

[48]  Phyllis K. Sokol.  From Edi to Electronic Commerce: A Business Initiative , 1995 .

[49]  Dominique Foray.  Users, standards and the economics of coalitions and committees , 1994 .

[50]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization , 1994 .

[51]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[52]  R. Garud,et al.  Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: An exploration of sun microsystems' open systems strategy , 1993 .

[53]  W. Lehr.  Standardization: Understanding the Process , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[54]  M. Cusumano,et al.  Strategic Maneuvering and Mass-Market Dynamics: The Triumph of VHS over Beta , 1992, Business History Review.

[55]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[56]  P. David,et al.  The Economics Of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction To Recent Research 1 , 1990 .

[57]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[58]  H. Varian.  Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach , 1987 .

[59]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[60]  P. David.  Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[61]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[62]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[63]  Gavin J. Wright.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1982 .