The operation region and MHD modes on the J-TEXT tokamak

The operation region and the parameter region of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) modes are analyzed for J-TEXT Ohmic discharges. The operation region is described by the Hugill diagram, which combines low-q and high density limits. It is found that the operation region has expanded over the years on J-TEXT. In detail, the high density limit has increased from less than 0.5n G to 0.7n G and the low-q limit has lowered from 2.8 to 2.2; this is due to the reduced impurity content that results from coating graphite on the wall. Furthermore, the operation region has further expanded to 0.85n G and q a ~ 2.0, respectively—a result of suppressing the disruptive precursor MHD by using externally-applied resonant magnetic perturbations (RMPs). Here, n G and q a are the Greenwald density limit and edge safety factor, respectively. Corresponding to the results of the operation region, the parameter regions of MHD modes are presented. It is found that a m/n = 2/1 tearing mode (TM) appears for a wide parameters region with 2.4 < q a < 4 and n e < 3 × 1019 m−3—here m and n are the poloidal and toroidal mode numbers. Furthermore, other MHD modes such as m/n = 5/2, 3/1, 4/1 and 7/2, appear only when their rational surfaces are close to the plasma edge or m/n ~ q a, and these MHD modes may transit to a 2/1 TM when changing the plasma parameters. In addition, correlation analysis between the amplitude and frequency of the dominant 2/1 TM for different plasma conditions reveals that there is a threshold between normal discharges and density-limit discharges, which would be a reference to predict density-limit disruptions.

[1]  L. Berry,et al.  Some observations on maximum densities in tokamak experiments , 1976 .

[2]  M. Rosenbluth,et al.  Simulation of Large Magnetic Islands: A Possible Mechanism for a Major Tokamak Disruption , 1977 .

[3]  P. Stott,et al.  High-density discharges with gettered torus walls in DITE , 1977 .

[4]  J. Wesson.  Hydromagnetic stability of tokamaks , 1978 .

[5]  J. Wesson,et al.  Major disruptions in tokamaks , 1980 .

[6]  D. E. Roberts.  Density and confinement time limits of Ohmically heated tokamaks , 1983 .

[7]  D. Post,et al.  Light-atom neutral beams for tandem mirror end plugs , 1983 .

[8]  J. Hugill.  Transport in tokamaks – a review of experiment , 1983 .

[9]  S. Wolfe,et al.  A new look at density limits in tokamaks , 1988 .

[10]  K. F. Mast,et al.  Disruptions in JET , 1989 .

[11]  Lloyd,et al.  Feedback stabilization of disruption precursors in a tokamak. , 1990, Physical review letters.

[12]  J. Ferreira,et al.  Effect of resonant magnetic perturbations on COMPASS-C tokamak discharges , 1992 .

[13]  Plasma.  Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions , 1999 .

[14]  W. Stacey,et al.  Parametric dependence of density limits in the Tokamak Experiment for Technology Oriented Research (TEXTOR): Comparison of thermal instability theory with experiment , 2001 .

[15]  M. Greenwald.  Density limits in toroidal plasmas , 2002 .

[16]  A. Loarte,et al.  Timescale and magnitude of plasma thermal energy loss before and during disruptions in JET , 2005 .

[17]  J. Manickam,et al.  Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions , 2007 .

[18]  Ming Zhang,et al.  The reconstruction and research progress of the TEXT-U tokamak in China , 2011 .

[19]  J. Contributors,et al.  Survey of disruption causes at JET , 2011 .

[20]  A. Fanni,et al.  Manifold learning to interpret JET high-dimensional operational space , 2013 .

[21]  M. Mauel,et al.  Multimode observations and 3D magnetic control of the boundary of a tokamak plasma , 2013 .

[22]  G. A. Navratil,et al.  Feedback-assisted extension of the tokamak operating space to low safety factora) , 2013 .

[23]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  Automatic disruption classification based on manifold learning for real-time applications on JET , 2013 .

[24]  A. Hyatt,et al.  Tokamak operation with safety factor q95 < 2 via control of MHD stability. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[25]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  Overview of manifold learning techniques for the investigation of disruptions on JET , 2013 .

[26]  Kexun Yu,et al.  Introduction to resonant magnetic perturbation coils of the J-TEXT Tokamak , 2014 .

[27]  A. Murari,et al.  Automatic disruption classification in JET with the ITER-like wall , 2015 .

[28]  P. Diamond,et al.  Overview of the recent research on the J-TEXT tokamak , 2015 .