A new class of composite indicators for measuring well-being at the local level: An application to the Equitable and Sustainable Well-being (BES) of the Italian Provinces

Abstract The aim of this paper is to propose a class of composite indicators for measuring well-being at the local level, which takes into account the variability between and within the local units. Although we believe that well-being is a multidimensional concept and cannot be reduced to a single measure, we also stress the importance of aggregating the information of several well-being indicators into a reduced number of composite indicators, one for each well-being domain, which play a crucial role in policymaking and benchmarking. As an application, we focus on the Equitable and Sustainable Well-being of the Italian Provinces. In particular, based on a dataset containing 41 elementary indicators, we aggregate them by domain, comparing different aggregative approaches and illustrating the difference in the rankings of the Italian Provinces they produce. Finally, as an illustrative example, we focus on a member of the class of composite indicators that accounts both for vertical variability (between the Provinces) and horizontal variability (within the Provinces). The construction of a composite index for each domain allows us to evaluate and compare multidimensional well-being among the Italian Provinces.

[1]  Jon Hall,et al.  A Framework to measure the progress of societies , 2011 .

[2]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress , 2011 .

[3]  Chris Randall,et al.  Measuring National Well-being: Life in the UK, 2012 , 2012 .

[4]  Tommaso Luzzati,et al.  An exercise in composite indicators construction: Assessing the sustainability of Italian regions , 2011 .

[5]  Enrico Giovannini,et al.  Il benessere equo e sostenibile in Italia , 2012 .

[6]  Brent Bleys.  Beyond GDP: Classifying Alternative Measures for Progress , 2011, Social Indicators Research.

[7]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  The measurement of economic performance and social progress revisited , 2009 .

[8]  S. Chowdhury,et al.  Setting weights for aggregate indices: An application to the commitment to development index and human development index , 2006 .

[9]  F. Chelli,et al.  COMPARING EQUITABLE AND SUSTAINABLE WELL-BEING (BES) ACROSS THE ITALIAN PROVINCES. A FACTOR ANALYSIS-BASED APPROACH , 2015 .

[10]  Peter Tyedmers,et al.  Contrasting and comparing sustainable development indicator metrics , 2007 .

[11]  Melissa J. Dobbie,et al.  Robustness and sensitivity of weighting and aggregation in constructing composite indices , 2013 .

[12]  Koen Decancq,et al.  Weights in Multidimensional Indices of Well-Being: An Overview , 2010 .

[13]  L. Becchetti,et al.  The drivers of happiness inequality Suggestions for promoting social cohesion , 2011 .

[14]  Fabiola Riccardini,et al.  How's life? : measuring well-being , 2011 .

[15]  Stefania Taralli,et al.  Measuring Equitable and Sustainable Well-Being (BES) for Policy-making at Local Level (Nuts3) , 2015 .

[16]  M. Mazziotta,et al.  On a Generalized Non-compensatory Composite Index for Measuring Socio-economic Phenomena , 2016 .

[17]  L. Salvati,et al.  A composite index of sustainable development at the local scale: Italy as a case study , 2014 .

[18]  E. Giovannini,et al.  Measuring Equitable and Sustainable Well-Being in Italy , 2012 .

[19]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2005 .

[20]  Massimiliano Mascherini,et al.  Well-Being in Italian Regions. Measures, Civil Society Consultation and Evidence , 2011 .

[21]  Matteo Mazziotta,et al.  METHODS FOR CONSTRUCTING COMPOSITE INDICES: ONE FOR ALL OR ALL FOR ONE? , 2013 .

[22]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Measuring the Immeasurable: A Survey of Sustainability Indices , 2007 .

[23]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .