Comparative performance of five Mexican plancha-type cookstoves using water boiling tests

While plancha-type cookstoves are very popular and widely disseminated in Latin America, few peer review articles exist documenting their detailed technical performance. In this paper we use the standard Water Boiling Tests (WBT) to assess the energy and emission performance of five plancha-type cookstoves disseminated in about 450 thousand Mexican rural homes compared to the traditional 3-stone fire (TSF). In the high-power phase, average modified combustion efficiencies (MCE) for plancha-type stoves were 97±1% which was higher than TSF 93±4%, and reductions in CO and PM2.5 total emissions were on average 44%. Time to boil and specific fuel consumption, however, were increased in plancha-type stoves compared to the open fire as a result of the reduced overall thermal efficiency of the plancha during WBT. In the simmering phase, plancha-type stoves showed much more consistent performance reductions compared to the TSF. MCE for plancha stoves were on average 98±1% and 95±3% for the TSF, while reductions in CO and PM2.5 total emissions were on average 55%. In this phase 27% average savings in fuel use are achieved by plancha-type stoves. Removal of the plancha rings resulted in savings of specific fuel consumption (SFC), thermal efficiency (TE), and time to boil; however, CO and PM2.5 emissions increased significantly as flue air is drawn through the comal surface rather than through the combustion zone, resulting in suboptimal combustion conditions.

[1]  M. Kleeman,et al.  Comparison of Real-Time Instruments Used To Monitor Airborne Particulate Matter , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[2]  Yanju Chen,et al.  Characterizing biofuel combustion with patterns of real-time emission data (PaRTED). , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Kirk R. Smith,et al.  Pollutant emissions and energy efficiency under controlled conditions for household biomass cookstoves and implications for metrics useful in setting international test standards. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Hassan Mtoro Rajabu,et al.  Multiple biomass fuels and improved cook stoves from Tanzania assessed with the Water Boiling Test , 2016 .

[5]  Tami C. Bond,et al.  A laboratory comparison of the global warming impact of five major types of biomass cooking stoves , 2008 .

[6]  J. Jetter,et al.  Solid-fuel household cook stoves: characterization of performance and emissions. , 2009 .

[7]  O. Masera,et al.  Energy performance of wood-burning cookstoves in Michoacan, Mexico. , 2008 .

[8]  Rufus Edwards,et al.  New approaches to performance testing of improved cookstoves. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Bryan Willson,et al.  Influence of testing parameters on biomass stove performance and development of an improved testing protocol , 2012 .

[10]  Kirk R. Smith,et al.  Implications of changes in household stoves and fuel use in China , 2004 .

[11]  J. D. de Winter.  Using the Student ’ s t-test with extremely small sample sizes , 2013 .

[12]  Nordica MacCarty,et al.  Laboratory study of the effects of moisture content on heat transfer and combustion efficiency of three biomass cook stoves , 2008 .

[13]  Yongliang Ma,et al.  Greenhouse Gases and other Airborne Pollutants from Household Stoves in China: a Database for Emission Factors , 2000 .

[14]  Rufus Edwards,et al.  Ouantification of carbon savings from improved biomass cookstove projects. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Omar Masera,et al.  Fuel switching or multiple cooking fuels? Understanding inter-fuel substitution patterns in rural Mexican households , 1997 .

[16]  Ranyee A. Chiang,et al.  Quantitative Stove Use and Ventilation Guidance for Behavior Change Strategies , 2015, Journal of health communication.

[17]  Rufus Edwards,et al.  In-field greenhouse gas emissions from cookstoves in rural Mexican households , 2008 .

[18]  Ken R. Smith,et al.  Performance testing for monitoring improved biomass stove interventions: experiences of the Household Energy and Health Project , 2007 .

[19]  G Ramachandran,et al.  Comparison of Short-Term Variations (15-Minute Averages) in Outdoor and Indoor PM2.5 Concentrations , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[20]  Jin Wang,et al.  Field testing and survey evaluation of household biomass cookstoves in rural sub-Saharan Africa , 2010 .

[21]  V. Joshi,et al.  GREENHOUSE GASES FROM SMALL-SCALE COMBUSTION DEVICES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: PHASE IIA Household Stoves in India , 2000 .

[22]  Harold J. Annegarn,et al.  A preliminary comparison between the heterogeneous protocols and the water boiling test , 2011 .

[23]  Nordica MacCarty,et al.  Fuel use and emissions performance of fifty cooking stoves in the laboratory and related benchmarks of performance , 2010 .