SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF HIGH-RISE STEEL MRFS WITH OUTRIGGER AND BELT TRUSSES THROUGH NONLINEAR DYNAMIC FE SIMULATIONS

The work reported herein summarizes the results of a series of nonlinear dynamic FE analyses devoted to assess the main criticalities in the seismic response of high-rise steel MRFs with outrigger and belt trusses. Thirtyand sixty-storey planar frames, extracted from reference three-dimensional structures composed of an internal one-way braced core, are designed in accordance with European rules. The core consists of a CBF system, while outriggers are placed every fifteen stories to limit inter-storey drifts and second order effects. FE models able to account for material and geometric nonlinearities have been developed within an open source FE code, using inelastic force-based fiber elements to model structural members and equivalent nonlinear links to reproduce the behaviour of bolted beam-column joints and welded gusset-plate connections. Out-of-plane imperfections are explicitly included in the braces to allow for potential buckling mechanisms in both braces and gusset plates. NLTHAs have been performed, in comparison with response spectrum analysis, aiming to quantify the potential of such systems, when included in the lateral-force resisting system of modern highrise steel MRFs. Global and local performance have been investigated in terms of inter-storey drift and acceleration peak profiles and axial force-displacement curves and static-to-seismic load ratios in critical braces at different floor levels. Sensitivity to the structure height has been explored by comparing the response of the two prototype MRFs. Trends are discussed to show that, if accurately designed and detailed, these structural systems provide an optimum combination of stiffness and strength.

[1]  Gian A. Rassati,et al.  Evaluation of the Response of Partially Restrained Bolted Beam-to-Column Connection Subjected to Cyclic Pseudo-Static Loads , 2013 .

[2]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  The 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake and response of high-rise buildings under long-period ground motions , 2011 .

[3]  E. Brunesi,et al.  Extreme response of reinforced concrete buildings through fiber force-based finite element analysis , 2014 .

[4]  Ming Wei Liu,et al.  An upper-bound pushover analysis procedure for estimating the seismic demands of high-rise buildings , 2004 .

[5]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Cyclic Modeling of Bolted Beam-to-Column Connections: Component Approach , 2011 .

[6]  Gian A. Rassati,et al.  Response of partially-restrained bolted beam-to-column connections under cyclic loads , 2014 .

[7]  Michael H. Scott,et al.  Krylov Subspace Accelerated Newton Algorithm: Application to Dynamic Progressive Collapse Simulation of Frames , 2010 .

[8]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  An analytical framework for seismic fragility analysis of RC high-rise buildings , 2007 .

[9]  Faramarz Khoshnoudian,et al.  Assessment of modified consecutive modal pushover analysis for estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings with dual system considering steel concentrically braced frames , 2012 .

[10]  Gian A. Rassati,et al.  Seismic response of MRFs with partially-restrained bolted beam-to-column connections through FE analyses , 2015 .

[11]  Faramarz Khoshnoudian,et al.  A consecutive modal pushover procedure for nonlinear static analysis of one-way unsymmetric-plan tall building structures , 2011 .

[12]  T. Y. Yang,et al.  The Tall Buildings Initiative , 2007 .

[13]  Robert E. Englekirk The impact of prescriptive provisions on the design of high‐rise buildings , 2005 .

[14]  Sid Ahmed Meftah,et al.  A simplified approach for seismic calculation of a tall building braced by shear walls and thin-walled open section structures , 2007 .

[15]  Xinzheng Lu,et al.  Earthquake-induced collapse simulation of a super-tall mega-braced frame-core tube building , 2013 .

[16]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Behaviour and modelling of partial‐strength beam‐to‐column composite joints for seismic applications , 2007 .

[17]  Timothy J. Sullivan,et al.  Equivalent viscous damping for steel concentrically braced frame structures , 2011 .

[18]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  VISCOUS DAMPING IN SEISMIC DESIGN AND ANALYSIS , 2005 .

[19]  Halil Sezen,et al.  Development of a simplified model and seismic energy dissipation in a super-tall building , 2014 .

[20]  Timothy J. Sullivan,et al.  Direct displacement-based seismic design of steel eccentrically braced frame structures , 2013, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[21]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Component Modeling of Partially Restrained Composite Joints under Cyclic and Dynamic Loading , 2004 .

[22]  Faramarz Khoshnoudian,et al.  A consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings , 2009 .

[23]  Gian A. Rassati,et al.  Modeling of different bracing configurations in multi-storey concentrically braced frames using a fiber-beam based approach , 2014 .

[24]  Roberto Nascimbene,et al.  Evaluation of the shear capacity of precast-prestressed hollow core slabs: numerical and experimental comparisons , 2015 .

[25]  Qiusheng Li,et al.  Seismic analysis of the world’s tallest building , 2009 .

[26]  Gian A. Rassati,et al.  Seismic Performance of Steel MRFs with Partially-Restrained, Bolted, Beam-to-Column Connections through FE Simulations , 2014 .

[27]  Qiusheng Li,et al.  Seismic random vibration analysis of tall buildings , 2004 .

[28]  Cs S. Li,et al.  Shaking Table Test of a 1:20 Scale High-Rise Building with a Transfer Plate System , 2006 .

[29]  Wensheng Lu,et al.  Shaking table model test on Shanghai World Financial Center Tower , 2007 .

[30]  Roberto Nascimbene,et al.  Strain Life Analysis at Low-Cycle Fatigue on Concentrically Braced Steel Structures with RHS Shape Braces , 2012 .

[31]  Roberto Nascimbene,et al.  Seismic Performance of Storage Steel Tanks during the May 2012 Emilia, Italy, Earthquakes , 2015 .

[32]  Gian A. Rassati,et al.  Numerical simulation of gusset plate connections with rectangular hollow section shape brace under quasi-static cyclic loading , 2012 .