Academic Sponsorship and Scientists' Careers.

Scientists' academic sponsors might influence their students' careers through the quality of training they provide and through their ability to transmit to their students a professional status and other ascriptive advantages. Using data for a probability sample of doctoral chemists, this study explores the effects of scientists' Ph.D. departments and several characteristics of their doctoral sponsors on their scientific productivity and positions over their first postdoctoral decade. Sponsorship appears to play a vital role in the chemists' careers. Their sponsors' productivity affected sample members' predoctoral productivity, and the calibre of their Ph.D. department affected their postdoctoral productivity. Although measures of the quality of their training did not affect the setting (university versus other employer) of the chemists' jobs, two measures of their sponsors' professional stature were consequential. These results suggest ascriptive effects of doctoral sponsorship, independent of the effects of sponsors' performance, the calibre of the Ph.D. department, and the chemists' own productivity.

[1]  T. Parsons.  The Social System , 1953 .

[2]  Lowell L. Hargens,et al.  Sponsored and Contest Mobility of American Academic Scientists , 1967 .

[3]  A. Bayer,et al.  Some Correlates of a Citation Measure of Productivity in Science , 1966 .

[4]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[5]  Bernard Berelson,et al.  From Graduate Education in the United States , 1961 .

[6]  Simon Marcson,et al.  The New Brahmins , 1969 .

[7]  Barbara F. Reskin,et al.  Sex Differences in Status Attainment in Science: The Case of the Post Doctoral Fellowship. , 1976 .

[8]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States: , 1979 .

[9]  T. Parsons,et al.  Toward a General Theory of Action , 1952 .

[10]  J. A. Davis,et al.  Stipends and Spouses , 1962 .

[11]  D. Crane.  Scientists at major and minor universities: a study of productivity and recognition. , 1965, American sociological review.

[12]  R. Lindsay,et al.  The social system of science , 1966 .

[13]  R. Merton,et al.  Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system , 1971 .

[14]  Leon H. Mayhew.  Ascription in Modern Societies , 1968 .

[15]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Social Stratification in Science , 1974 .

[16]  Stuart S. Blume,et al.  Toward a political sociology of science , 1974 .

[17]  Allan M. Cartter,et al.  An Assessment of Quality in Graduate Education , 1966 .

[18]  E. Hanushek.  Statistical methods for social scientists , 1977 .

[19]  Ruth Sinclair,et al.  Chemists in British Universities: A Study of the Reward System in Science , 1973 .

[20]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Stratification in American Science , 1970 .

[21]  P. Allison,et al.  Productivity Differences Among Scientists: Evidence for Accumulative Advantage , 1974 .

[22]  Neil Wrigley,et al.  An introduction to the use of logit models in geography , 1976 .

[23]  Alexander W. Astin,et al.  Predicting academic performance in college : selectivity data for 2300 American colleges , 1971 .