Sustainable machining of high temperature Nickel alloy – Inconel 718: part 2 – chip breakability and optimization

Abstract Global competition, stricter environmental legislation and demands for fulfilling sustainability initiatives, are increasing the pressure on the manufacturing industry, to develop and implement in their production alternative sustainable machining processes. This work focuses on sustainability evaluation and comparison in machining of high-temperature Nickel-based alloy (Inconel 718). Four sustainable machining alternatives (dry, near-dry (MQL), cryogenic and cryo-lubrication (cryogenic + near-dry)) to conventional machining, are evaluated based on the performance models from the Part 1 of the paper and used in the optimization procedure for determining the overall optimum machining conditions. As chip breakability is important machining characteristic, performance-based models of sustainable machining processes, developed in Part 1, are upgraded in this Part 2 of the paper with an additional model for chip breakability. Updated models are used as inputs to the optimization procedure developed, based on the combined overall desirability function. Genetic algorithms (GA) are used to evaluate and optimize the machining process for each cooling/lubrication (C/L) application. Results of the work show that machining performance optimization, when including beside machining parameters also the sustainable alternative cooling/lubrication conditions, can provide further improvement of the processes through tool-life, machined surface quality, chip breakability, productivity and nevertheless power consumption.

[1]  Peter Krajnik,et al.  Design of grinding factors based on response surface methodology , 2005 .

[2]  Karl R. Haapala,et al.  Challenges for the Manufacturing Enterprise to Achieve Sustainable Development , 2008 .

[3]  Murat Sarıkaya,et al.  Taguchi design and response surface methodology based analysis of machining parameters in CNC turning under MQL , 2014 .

[4]  Janez Kopac,et al.  Sustainable machining of high temperature Nickel alloy – Inconel 718: part 1 – predictive performance models , 2014 .

[5]  I. S. Jawahir,et al.  A hybrid algorithm for predicting chip form/chip breakability in machining , 1996 .

[6]  Stefan Velchev,et al.  Empirical models for specific energy consumption and optimization of cutting parameters for minimizing energy consumption during turning , 2014 .

[7]  A. K. Balaji,et al.  Performance-based optimal selection of cutting conditions and cutting tools in multipass turning operations using genetic algorithms , 2002 .

[8]  Emmanuel O. Ezugwu,et al.  Effect of high-pressure coolant supply when machining nickel-base, Inconel 718, alloy with coated carbide tools , 2004 .

[9]  I. Jawahir,et al.  Surface integrity in cryogenic machining of nickel based alloy—Inconel 718 , 2011 .

[10]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[11]  Janez Kopac,et al.  Achievements of sustainable manufacturing by machining , 2009 .

[12]  Franci Cus,et al.  Optimization of cutting process by GA approach , 2003 .

[13]  E. Ezugwu Key improvements in the machining of difficult-to-cut aerospace superalloys , 2005 .

[14]  Paul Mativenga,et al.  Sustainable machining: selection of optimum turning conditions based on minimum energy considerations , 2010 .

[15]  Rajesh Kumar Bhushan,et al.  Optimization of cutting parameters for minimizing power consumption and maximizing tool life during machining of Al alloy SiC particle composites , 2013 .

[16]  A. Moufki,et al.  A review of developments towards dry and high speed machining of Inconel 718 alloy , 2004 .

[17]  Girish Kant,et al.  Prediction and optimization of machining parameters for minimizing power consumption and surface roughness in machining , 2014 .

[18]  Janez Kopac,et al.  Sustainability Assessment: Cryogenic Machining of Inconel 718 , 2011 .

[19]  Jože Balič,et al.  Model of complex optimization of cutting conditions , 1997 .

[20]  K. C. Ee,et al.  Performance-Based Predictive Models and Optimization Methods for Turning Operations and Applications: Part 1—Tool Wear/Tool Life in Turning with Coated Grooved Tools , 2006 .

[21]  Peter Krajnik,et al.  Robust design of flank milling parameters based on grey-Taguchi method , 2007 .

[22]  Seung-Han Yang,et al.  Assessment of chip-breaking characteristics using new chip-breaking index , 2006 .

[23]  Giuliano Bissacco,et al.  Reliability of electrode wear compensation based on material removal per discharge in micro EDM milling , 2013 .

[24]  John W. Sutherland,et al.  Dry Machining and Minimum Quantity Lubrication , 2004 .

[25]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[26]  Behnam Davoodi,et al.  Experimental investigation and optimization of cutting parameters in dry and wet machining of aluminum alloy 5083 in order to remove cutting fluid , 2014 .

[27]  I. Hanafi,et al.  Optimization of cutting conditions for sustainable machining of PEEK-CF30 using TiN tools , 2012 .

[28]  R. Saravanan,et al.  Optimization of multi-pass turning operations using ant colony system , 2003 .