The Applicability of TAM Outside North America: An Empirical Test in the United Kingdom

Recently, researchers in IS have begun to rely on the theories of innovation diffusion to study implementation problems. A major focus of these studies has been how potential users' perceptions of the information technology IT innovation influence its adoption. User acceptance of IT has been a primary focus in the MIS implementation research for the past decade. Why do users accept or reject information systems? How is user acceptance affected by perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and attitude toward acceptance behavior? The present research addresses these questions in the Western Europe culture. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the applicability of the technology acceptance model in the United Kingdom. This study seeks empirical support for the well-known technology acceptance model, or TAM in the UK. TAM is used as a base model to produce a causal model resembling a network of relationships among the constructs of the study. A field study of 324 users regarding an IT system was conducted in the UK to validate measures used to operationalize model variables and to test the hypothesized network of relationships. Partial Least Squares PLS, a second-generation multivariate analysis technique, was used to estimate the parameters of the proposed causal model. The study findings indicate that TAM is very applicable to the UK, which lend a hand to a good tool of assessing IT acceptance in this developed region of the world. They also indicate that perceived usefulness has the largest influence on IT acceptance followed by users' attitudes toward IT. Perceived usefulness demonstrate to operate directly on IT acceptance and indirectly through attitudes. Meanwhile, perceived ease of use has a larger influence on users' attitudes than does perceived usefulness. Suggestions for future research and implications of findings are discussed.

[1]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[2]  G. Rose,et al.  PREDICTING GENERAL IT USE : APPLYING TAM TO THE ARABIC WORLD , 1998 .

[3]  Paul Attewell,et al.  Computing and organizations: what we know and what we don't know , 1984, CACM.

[4]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[5]  Girish H. Subramanian,et al.  A Replication of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Measurement , 1994 .

[6]  Donald L. Amoroso,et al.  Quality end user-developed applications: some essential ingredients , 1992, DATB.

[7]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Organizational Characteristics and MIS Success in the Context of Small Business , 1985, MIS Q..

[8]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution , 1995 .

[9]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage , 1999 .

[10]  Mary B. Prescott,et al.  Diffusion of innovation theory: borrowings, extensions, and modifications from IT researchers , 1995 .

[11]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Sue A. Conger,et al.  INNOVATIONS : A CLASSIFICATION BY IT LOCUS OF IMPACT AND RESEARCH APPROACH , 2002 .

[13]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  Survey Research Methods , 1984 .

[14]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[15]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Assessing User Computing Effectiveness: An Integrated Model , 1997 .

[16]  Fred D. Davis User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[17]  Mark Keil,et al.  Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[18]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Factors of success for end-user computing , 1988, CACM.

[19]  R. Hauser,et al.  The Decomposition of Effects in Path Analysis , 1975 .

[20]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  User acceptance of microcomputer technology: An empirical test , 1993 .

[21]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[22]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[23]  R. M. Durand,et al.  Applying the Jackknife Statistic in Testing and Interpreting Canonical Weights, Loadings, and Cross-Loadings , 1982 .

[24]  Said S. Al-Gahtani,et al.  Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: Factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[25]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[26]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .

[27]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Information System Implementation: Bridging the Gap Between Design and Utilization , 1988 .

[28]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[29]  Timothy Paul Cronan,et al.  On the Test-Retest Reliability of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use Scales , 1993 .

[30]  R. Fazio On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. , 1989 .

[31]  Nancy C. Goodwin,et al.  Functionality and usability , 1987, CACM.

[32]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Adoption intention in GSS: relative importance of beliefs , 1995, DATB.

[33]  M. Treacy,et al.  Utilization as a dependent variable in MIS research , 2015, DATB.

[34]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[35]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory: , 1982 .

[36]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  End-user computing effectiveness: A structural equation model , 1990 .

[37]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing , 1995 .

[38]  Mehdi Khosrowpour,et al.  Annals of Cases on Information Technology , 2002 .

[39]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  An empirical investigation on factors affecting the acceptance of CASE by systems developers , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[40]  Denis M. S. Lee Usage Patterns and Sources of Assistance for Personal Computer Users , 1986, MIS Q..

[41]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[42]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Causal Modeling: a General Method For Developing and Testing Theories in Consumer Research , 1981 .

[43]  R. A. Grant,et al.  Building and testing a causal model of an information technology's impact , 1989, ICIS '89.

[44]  N. Melone A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research , 1990 .

[45]  D. Larcker,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS WITH UNOBSERVABLE VARIABLES AND MEASUREMENT ERROR , 1981 .

[46]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[47]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of End-User Computing , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  Bernadette Szajna,et al.  Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model , 1996 .

[49]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[50]  Thomas Hill,et al.  Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. , 1987 .

[51]  Fred D. Davis A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .