Simulation-based robust optimization for complex truck-shovel systems in surface coal mines

A robust simulation-based optimization approach is proposed for truck-shovel systems in surface coal mines to maximize the expected value of revenue obtained from customer trains. To this end, a large surface coal mine in North America is considered as case study, and a highly detailed simulation model of that mine is constructed in Arena. Factors encountered in material handling operations that may affect the robustness of revenue are then classified into 1) controllable, 2) uncontrollable and 3) constant categories. Historical production data of the mine is used to derive probability distributions for the uncontrollable factors. Then, Response Surface Methodology is applied to derive an expression for the variance of revenue under the influence of controllable and uncontrollable factors. The resulting variance expression is applied as a constraint to the mathematical formulation for optimization using OptQuest. Finally, coal production is observed under variation in number of trucks and down events.

[1]  Young-Jun Son,et al.  Simulation-based optimal planning for material handling networks in mining , 2013, Simul..

[2]  Sean D Dessureault,et al.  Simulation-based decision support system for sustainable coalmining operations , 2012 .

[3]  Chao Meng,et al.  Data-driven modeling and simulation framework for material handling systems in coal mines , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[4]  Constantine Caramanis,et al.  Theory and Applications of Robust Optimization , 2010, SIAM Rev..

[5]  Russell R. Barton,et al.  Chapter 18 Metamodel-Based Simulation Optimization , 2006, Simulation.

[6]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Robust simulation-optimization using metamodels , 2009, Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[7]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[8]  Michael C. Fu,et al.  Feature Article: Optimization for simulation: Theory vs. Practice , 2002, INFORMS J. Comput..

[9]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Robust Optimization in Simulation: Taguchi and Krige Combined , 2009, INFORMS J. Comput..

[10]  Michael C. Fu,et al.  Optimization for Simulation: Theory vs. Practice , 2002 .

[11]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  A framework for Response Surface Methodology for simulation optimization , 2000, 2000 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37165).

[12]  Nikolaos V. Sahinidis,et al.  Optimization under uncertainty: state-of-the-art and opportunities , 2004, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[13]  Susan M. Sanchez,et al.  Designing simulation experiments: Taguchi methods and response surface metamodels , 1991, 1991 Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings..

[14]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Robust Optimization in Simulation: Taguchi and Response Surface Methodology , 2008 .