Comparing Health Workforce Policy during a Major Global Health Crisis: A Critical Conceptual Debate and International Empirical Investigation

Background: The health workforce is central to healthcare systems and population health, but marginal in comparative health policy. This study aims to highlight the crucial relevance of the health workforce and contribute comparative evidence to help improve the protection of healthcare workers and prevention of inequalities during a major public health crisis. Methods: Our integrated governance framework considers system, sector, organizational and socio-cultural dimensions of health workforce policy. The COVID-19 pandemic serves as the policy field and Brazil, Canada, Italy, and Germany as illustrative cases. We draw on secondary sources (literature, document analysis, public statistics, reports) and country expert information with a focus on the first COVID-19 waves until the summer of 2021. Results: Our comparative investigation illustrates the benefits of a multi-level governance approach beyond health system typologies. In the selected countries, we found similar problems and governance gaps concerning increased workplace stress, lack of mental health support, and gender and racial inequalities. Health policy across countries failed to adequately respond to the needs of HCWs, thus exacerbating inequalities during a major global health crisis. Conclusions: Comparative health workforce policy research may contribute new knowledge to improve health system resilience and population health during a crisis.

[1]  E. Kuhlmann,et al.  SDG5 “Gender Equality” and the COVID-19 pandemic: A rapid assessment of health system responses in selected upper-middle and high-income countries , 2022, Frontiers in Public Health.

[2]  Benjamin D. Trump,et al.  Alignment and authority: Federalism, social policy, and COVID-19 response , 2022, Health Policy.

[3]  G. Lotta,et al.  Inequality in the middle of a crisis: an analysis of health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic from the profession, race, and gender perspectives. , 2022, Ciencia & saude coletiva.

[4]  E. Kuhlmann,et al.  COVID-19 vaccination challenge: what have we learned from the Brazilian process? , 2022, The Lancet Global Health.

[5]  S. Peckham,et al.  Health system resilience and health workforce capacities: Comparing health system responses during the COVID‐19 pandemic in six European countries , 2022, The International journal of health planning and management.

[6]  R. Morgan,et al.  Women healthcare workers’ experiences during COVID-19 and other crises: A scoping review , 2022, International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances.

[7]  C. Wenham,et al.  Gender and Race on the Frontline: Experiences of Health Workers in Brazil during the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2021, Social politics.

[8]  M. Terraneo,et al.  Covid-19 e rischi per il personale sanitario: il ruolo dei sistemi sanitari regionali , 2021, SALUTE E SOCIETÀ.

[9]  J. Benach,et al.  Employment and working conditions of nurses: where and how health inequalities have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic? , 2021, Human Resources for Health.

[10]  M. Mckee.  Building back better: why we need to fix the health worker divide in Europe. , 2021, European journal of public health.

[11]  C. Wenham,et al.  Gender, race, and health workers in the COVID-19 pandemic , 2021, The Lancet.

[12]  J. Buchan,et al.  The health workforce: Central to an effective response to the COVID‐19 pandemic in the European Region , 2021, The International journal of health planning and management.

[13]  W. Zhong,et al.  Multi-Level Governance, Policy Coordination and Subnational Responses to COVID-19: Comparing China and the US , 2021 .

[14]  J. Denis,et al.  Global health and innovation: A panoramic view on health human resources in the COVID‐19 pandemic context , 2021, The International journal of health planning and management.

[15]  G. Lotta,et al.  The vulnerabilities of the Brazilian health workforce during health emergencies: Analysing personal feelings, access to resources and work dynamics during the COVID‐19 pandemic , 2021, The International journal of health planning and management.

[16]  M. Giancotti,et al.  Italian responses to the COVID-19 emergency: Overthrowing 30 years of health reforms? , 2021, Health Policy.

[17]  Anat Gofen,et al.  Street-Level Bureaucrats at the Forefront of Pandemic Response: A Comparative Perspective , 2021, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice.

[18]  V. Lin,et al.  Governance in health workforce: how do we improve on the concept? A network-based, stakeholder-driven approach , 2021, Human Resources for Health.

[19]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2021, European Journal of Public Health.

[20]  S. Greer,et al.  Coronavirus Politics , 2021 .

[21]  D. Pearce,et al.  Ensure Healthy Lives and Promote Well-Being for All At All Ages , 2021, Geosciences and the Sustainable Development Goals.

[22]  A. Tricco,et al.  Occupational Stress, Burnout, and Depression in Women in Healthcare During COVID-19 Pandemic: Rapid Scoping Review , 2020, Frontiers in Global Women's Health.

[23]  I. Dhalla,et al.  COVID-19 in long-term care homes in Ontario and British Columbia , 2020, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[24]  B. Bošnjak,et al.  Strategic Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Serology Testing in a Low Prevalence Setting: The COVID-19 Contact (CoCo) Study in Healthcare Professionals , 2020, Infectious Diseases and Therapy.

[25]  Rosella Levaggi,et al.  Resilient managed competition during pandemics: lessons from the Italian experience during COVID-19 , 2020, Health Economics, Policy and Law.

[26]  M. Wismar,et al.  Health labour markets and the ‘human face’ of the health workforce: resilience beyond the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, European Journal of Public Health.

[27]  S. Chreim,et al.  Learning from health system reform trajectories in seven Canadian provinces , 2020, Health Economics, Policy and Law.

[28]  H. Goossens,et al.  Monitoring approaches for health-care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[29]  João Nunes,et al.  Community health workers reveal COVID-19 disaster in Brazil , 2020, The Lancet.

[30]  G. Capano.  Policy design and state capacity in the COVID-19 emergency in Italy: if you are not prepared for the (un)expected, you can be only what you already are , 2020, Policy & society.

[31]  S. Straus,et al.  Restoring trust: COVID-19 and the future of long-term care in Canada , 2020, FACETS.

[32]  N. Reibling,et al.  Worlds of Healthcare: A Healthcare System Typology of OECD Countries. , 2019, Health policy.

[33]  M. Wismar,et al.  It’s the governance, stupid! TAPIC: a governance framework to strengthen decision making and implementation , 2019 .

[34]  E. Kuhlmann,et al.  Health and Education Policy: Labour Markets, Qualifications, and the Struggle over Standards , 2019, Education and Public Policy in the European Union.

[35]  S. Neri,et al.  Redefining the State in Health Care Policy in Italy and the United States , 2018, European Policy Analysis.

[36]  A. Ghaffar,et al.  Advancing the science behind human resources for health: highlights from the Health Policy and Systems Research Reader on Human Resources for Health , 2018, Human Resources for Health.

[37]  R. Batenburg,et al.  A call for action to establish a research agenda for building a future health workforce in Europe , 2018, Health Research Policy and Systems.

[38]  Till Bärnighausen,et al.  Statutory health insurance in Germany: a health system shaped by 135 years of solidarity, self-governance, and competition , 2017, The Lancet.

[39]  J. Denis,et al.  Professional agency, leadership and organizational change , 2016 .

[40]  J. Denis,et al.  General introduction: The changing world of professions and professionalism , 2016 .

[41]  J. Denis,et al.  The Routledge Companion to the Professions and Professionalism , 2016 .

[42]  K. Willis.  The Palgrave international handbook of healthcare policy and governance , 2016 .

[43]  E. Kuhlmann,et al.  Health workforce development in the European Union: A matrix for comparing trajectories of change in the professions. , 2016, Health policy.

[44]  E. Pavolini,et al.  Health workforce governance in Italy. , 2015, Health policy.

[45]  G. Dussault.  Bringing the Health Workforce Challenge to the Policy Agenda , 2015 .

[46]  C. Wendt.  Changing Healthcare System Types , 2014 .

[47]  Christine A. Sinsky,et al.  From Triple to Quadruple Aim: Care of the Patient Requires Care of the Provider , 2014, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[48]  Reinhard Busse,et al.  Germany: Health system review. , 2014, Health systems in transition.

[49]  Achim Schmid,et al.  Five types of OECD healthcare systems: empirical results of a deductive classification. , 2013, Health policy.

[50]  Dal Poz,et al.  A crise da força de trabalho em saúde , 2013 .

[51]  Dal Poz,et al.  The crisis of health workforce. , 2013 .

[52]  Claus Wendt,et al.  Healthcare System Types: A Conceptual Framework for Comparison , 2009 .

[53]  Mike Maitland,et al.  CHANGING THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM , 2009 .

[54]  J. Saver,et al.  PROTECT , 2004, Neurology.

[55]  Robert H. Blank,et al.  Comparative Health Policy , 2004 .