A short numerical study on the optimization methods influence on topology optimization

Structural topology optimization problems are commonly defined using continuous design variables combined with material interpolation schemes. One of the challenges for density based topology optimization observed in the review article (Sigmund and Maute Struct Multidiscip Optim 48(6):1031–1055 2013) is the slow convergence that is often encountered in practice, when an almost solid-and-void design is found. The purpose of this forum article is to present some preliminary observations on how designs evolves during the optimization process for different choices of optimization methods. Additionally, the authors want to open a discussion on how to properly define and identify the boundary translation that is often observed in practice. The authors hope that these preliminary observations can open for fruitful discussions and stimulate further investigations concerning slowly moving boundaries. Although the discussion is centered on density based methods it may be equally relevant to level-set and phase-field approaches.

[1]  J. J. Moré,et al.  Quasi-Newton Methods, Motivation and Theory , 1974 .

[2]  Mathias Stolpe,et al.  An efficient second-order SQP method for structural topology optimization , 2016 .

[3]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Manufacturing tolerant topology optimization , 2009 .

[4]  Hiroshi Yamashita A globally convergent primal-dual interior point method for constrained optimization , 1998 .

[5]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization , 1999 .

[6]  K. Svanberg The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization , 1987 .

[7]  Patrick R. Amestoy,et al.  Multifrontal parallel distributed symmetric and unsymmetric solvers , 2000 .

[8]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  An Interior Point Algorithm for Large-Scale Nonlinear Programming , 1999, SIAM J. Optim..

[9]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Topology Optimization: "Theory, Methods, And Applications" , 2011 .

[10]  Anders Clausen,et al.  Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code , 2011 .

[11]  J. Nocedal,et al.  A sequential quadratic programming algorithm with an additional equality constrained phase , 2012 .

[12]  O. Sigmund,et al.  Topology optimization approaches , 2013, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[13]  Paul T. Boggs,et al.  Sequential Quadratic Programming , 1995, Acta Numerica.

[14]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming , 2006, Math. Program..

[15]  M. Zhou,et al.  The COC algorithm, Part II: Topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization , 1991 .

[16]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  On the Design of Compliant Mechanisms Using Topology Optimization , 1997 .

[17]  M. Bendsøe Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem , 1989 .

[18]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  Adaptive Barrier Update Strategies for Nonlinear Interior Methods , 2008, SIAM J. Optim..

[19]  M. Stolpe,et al.  Benchmarking optimization solvers for structural topology optimization , 2015 .

[20]  Anders Forsgren,et al.  Primal-Dual Interior Methods for Nonconvex Nonlinear Programming , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[21]  B. Bourdin Filters in topology optimization , 2001 .

[22]  M. Zhou,et al.  The COC algorithm, part I: Cross-section optimization or sizing , 1991 .

[23]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2018, Fundamental Statistical Inference.

[24]  J. Nocedal Updating Quasi-Newton Matrices With Limited Storage , 1980 .