Shall we dance? A design epistemology for organizational learning and performance

Management experts claim that organizational learning, knowledge management, intellectual capital, and related concepts are more important to today's organizations than traditional assets such as natural resources and skilled labor. Management thus enters domains more typically studied by those in training, education, and human performance technology, and fundamental questions asked by philosophers are now asked by CEOs; for example, What is knowledge? and How do people learn? Cook and Brown (1999) responded with an attractive metaphor. They claimed that a “generative dance” of knowledge and knowing results in new knowledge and new knowing. However, they portrayed this dance as if it happens automatically. In this article, it is argued that human intentions play a major role, and that when intentions are added, the dance is accurately described as designing. Design, then, provides alternative answers to the fundamental questions about knowledge and learning, as well as different competencies for professional practice and different directions for enhancing organizational success. An attempt at such answers, competencies, and directions is made by linking literatures on learning and performance with design and by articulating what is essentially a design epistemology.

[1]  D. Teece.  Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions , 2000 .

[2]  Johan Roos,et al.  Representationism : The Traditional Approach to Cooperative Strategies , 1996 .

[3]  Ralph Stacey,et al.  Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations: Learning and Knowledge Creation , 2001 .

[4]  J. E. Holt,et al.  Design or problem solving — a critical choice for the engineering profession , 1985 .

[5]  Gordon Rowland.  A Tripartite Seed: The Future Creating Capacity of Designing, Learning and Systems , 1999 .

[6]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think , 1980 .

[7]  S. D. N. Cook,et al.  Culture and Organizational Learning , 1993 .

[8]  Bela H. Banathy,et al.  Systems Design of Education: A Journey to Create the Future , 1991 .

[9]  H. Tsoukas,et al.  What is Organizational Knowledge , 2001 .

[10]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Knowledge and Organization , 2001 .

[11]  S. Mezias,et al.  An Organizational Learning Model of Convergence and Reorientation , 1992 .

[12]  Vladimir Hubka,et al.  A scientific approach to engineering design , 1987 .

[13]  Thomas F. Gilbert,et al.  Human Competence: Engineering Worthy Performance , 1978 .

[14]  D. Perkins.  Knowledge As Design , 1986 .

[15]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[16]  Johan Roos,et al.  Knowledge Creation Through Cooperative Experimentation , 1996 .

[17]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  Organizing Work by Adaptation , 1991 .

[18]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[19]  Donald A. Schön.  The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action , 1986 .

[20]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[21]  Gordon Rowland,et al.  Designing and instructional design , 1993 .

[22]  Anna Grandori,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Dialogue on Organization and Knowledge , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[23]  S. Sitkin.  Learning Through Failure : The Strategy of Small Losses , 1992 .

[24]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. , 2001 .

[25]  James P. Carse,et al.  Finite and Infinite Games , 1986 .

[26]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999 .

[27]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[28]  J. Swan,et al.  Knowledge Management: Concepts and Controversies , 2001 .

[29]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[30]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[31]  Verna Allee,et al.  The Knowledge Evolution: Expanding Organizational Intelligence , 1997 .

[32]  R. Stacey.  Complexity and Creativity in Organizations , 1996 .

[33]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[34]  D. Boud,et al.  Reflection, turning experience into learning , 1985 .

[35]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World , 2002 .

[36]  John N. Warfield,et al.  A Science of Generic Design: Managing Complexity Through Systems Design , 1994 .

[37]  John C. Thomas,et al.  The psychological study of design , 1979 .

[38]  U. Neisser,et al.  Cognition and thought : an information-processing approach , 1966 .

[39]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Odd Couple: Making Sense of the Curious Concept of Knowledge Management , 2001 .

[40]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[41]  N. Cross.  Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[42]  Bela H. Banathy.  The Design of Evolutionary Guidance Systems , 1989 .

[43]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1990 .

[44]  P. Nystrom,et al.  To Avoid Organizational Crises, Unlearn , 1984 .

[45]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[46]  M. Nadin,et al.  MIND: A Design Machine — Conceptual Framework , 1987 .

[47]  The necessity of being , 1973 .

[48]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[49]  Bela H. Banathy,et al.  Designing social systems in a changing world , 1996 .