From the other side of the reference desk: A focus group study

Abstract A study of how patrons think and behave as they seek information at a major research library reveals the need to provide the kinds of services and programs that meet the actual needs and preferences of patrons. Focusing on what librarians think is needed can result in poor service.

[1]  Michael K. Buckland,et al.  Redesigning Library Services: A Manifesto , 1992 .

[2]  T. Eadie.  Immodest proposals : User instruction for students does not work , 1990 .

[3]  Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan,et al.  The Five Laws of Library Science , 1948 .

[4]  William L. Whitson.  Differentiated service: A new reference model , 1995 .

[5]  Robert Hauptman,et al.  Is traditional reference service obsolete , 1995 .

[6]  Sarah Hager Johnston.  Desperately Seeking Authority Control: Automated Systems Are Not Providing It. , 1990 .

[7]  Douglas Herman.  But Does It Work? Evaluating the Brandeis Reference Model. , 1994 .

[8]  Thelma Freides,et al.  Current Trends in Academic Libraries. , 1983 .

[9]  Jennifer S Cargill,et al.  The Electronic Reference Desk: Reference Service in an Electronic World. , 1992 .

[10]  Karen Storin Summerhill.  The High Cost of Reference:: The Need to Reassess Services and Service Delivery , 1994 .

[11]  Barbara J. Ford,et al.  Reference beyond (and without) the Reference Desk , 1986 .

[12]  Barbara Fister.  Teaching the Rhetorical Dimensions of Research. , 1993 .

[13]  Margaret F. Stieg.  Technology and the Concept of Reference, or What Will Happen to the Milkman's Cow?. , 1990 .

[14]  Arlene Greer,et al.  Assessment of Learning Outcomes: A Measure of Progress in Library Literacy , 1991 .

[15]  J. Rettig.  The convergence of the twain or titanic collision? Bi and reference in the 1990s' sea of change , 1995 .

[16]  Marjorie E. Murfin,et al.  Quality reference service: A preliminary case study , 1996 .

[17]  D. Morgan.  Focus groups for qualitative research. , 1988, Hospital guest relations report.