Importance of using field spectroscopy to support the satellite remote sensing for underground structures intended for security reasons in the eastern Mediterranean region

Underground structures can affect their surrounding landscapes in different ways such as soil moisture content, soil composition and vegetation vigor. Vegetation vigor is often observed on the ground as a crop mark; a phenomenon which can be used as a proxy to denote the presence of underground and not visible structures. This paper presents the results obtained from field spectroradiometric campaigns at ‘buried’ underground structures in Cyprus. A SVC-HR1024 field spectroradiometer was used and in-band reflectances were calculated for the Landsat 5 TM medium spatial resolution satellite sensor. A number of vegetation indices such as NDVI, SR and EVI were obtained while a ‘smart index’ was developed aiming for detection of underground military structures by using existing vegetation indices or other in-band algorithms. In this study, test areas were identified, analyzed and modeled. The areas have been analyzed and tested in different scenarios, including: (a) the ‘natural state’ of the underground structure (b) the different type of crop over the underground structure and imported soil (c) the different types of non-natural material over the underground structure. A reference target in the nearby area was selected as a baseline. Controllable meteorological and environmental parameters were acquired and monitored.

[1]  Diofantos G. Hadjimitsis,et al.  Evaluation of Broadband and Narrowband Vegetation Indices for the Identification of Archaeological Crop Marks , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[2]  Diofantos G. Hadjimitsis,et al.  Spectral sensitivity of ALOS, ASTER, IKONOS, LANDSAT and SPOT satellite imagery intended for the detection of archaeological crop marks , 2014, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[3]  Geomatics Canada,et al.  Fundamentals of Remote Sensing , 2001 .

[4]  George Papadavid,et al.  Estimating evapotranspiration for annual crops in Cyprus using remote sensing , 2011 .

[5]  Diofantos G. Hadjimitsis,et al.  Vegetation indices and field spectroradiometric measurements for validation of buried architectural remains: verification under area surveyed with geophysical campaigns , 2011 .

[6]  D. Hadjimitsis,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Systems and Spectroscopy for Remote Sensing Applications in Archaeology , 2015 .

[7]  Diofantos G. Hadjimitsis,et al.  Integrated use of field spectroscopy and satellite remote sensing for defence and security applications in Cyprus , 2016, International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of Environment.

[8]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Intercalibration of vegetation indices from different sensor systems , 2003 .

[9]  Eric M Sepp Deeply Buried Facilities: Implications for Military Operations , 2012 .

[10]  A. Agapiou Orthogonal equations for the detection of hidden archaeological remains de-mystified , 2017 .

[11]  Rosa Lasaponara,et al.  Identification of archaeological buried remains based on the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) from Quickbird satellite data , 2006, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[12]  S. Parcak Satellite Remote Sensing for Archaeology , 2009 .

[13]  Maj Brian Crothers,et al.  Chapter 13 US Space-Based Intelligence , Surveillance , and Reconnaissance , 2009 .

[14]  Marco J. Giardino,et al.  A History of NASA Remote Sensing Contributions to Archaeology , 2013 .