Power of peripheral designers: how users learn to design

In information system development, end-users often participate in design and in many cases learn to design their own system. Design, however, requires a distinct approach that users typically are not familiar with. The unique position in which users find themselves makes users' learning even more complicated: They have no interest in designing and becoming designers. To understand how users learn to design despite such difficulties, longitudinal ethnography was conducted in an accounting system development project. The analysis reveals how a user progressively acquired the design capability in two months. In the beginning, the user treated the problem as given and rejected design proposed by designers that did not solve the given problems. The user then gradually learned the details of the system and started to explore various configurations of features; however, this design focused on parts, with the problem remaining fixed. The user finally demonstrated her design capability by constructing creative designs both in parts and on the whole. Drawing on situated learning theory, the notion of the peripheral designer is used to illustrate this type of design practice. The user became a peripheral designer in that she could design in a competent but peripheral manner without becoming a full designer. Power relationships posed challenges to this learning. The notion of the peripheral designer clarifies what designing is, beyond active participation in discussion and configuration of parts, and delineates a realistic picture of how a user learns to design in the real world.

[1]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[2]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Russell L. Purvis,et al.  Controlling Information Systems Development Projects: The View from the Client , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Managing Client Dialogues During Information Systems Design to Facilitate Client Learning , 2005, MIS Q..

[5]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[6]  Fred P. Brooks,et al.  The Mythical Man-Month , 1975, Reliable Software.

[7]  Jane Darke,et al.  The primary Generator and the Design Process , 1979 .

[8]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .

[9]  Eva Olsson,et al.  What active users and designers contribute in the design process , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[10]  J. Iivari,et al.  Varieties of User-Centeredness , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[11]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Jonas Löwgren,et al.  Methods & tools: design methodology and design practice , 1999, INTR.

[13]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Making a Difference: Organization as Design , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[14]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[15]  C. T. Hansen,et al.  The Design Process , 2015 .

[16]  Ajay S. Vinze,et al.  Understanding the Philosophical Underpinnings of Software Engineering Research in Information Systems , 2001, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[17]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[18]  Fred L. Collopy,et al.  Design Matters for Management , 2010 .

[19]  Donald A. Schön Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1987 .

[20]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Designing Human Systems For New Technology: The Ethics Method , 1983 .

[21]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research , 1984 .

[22]  Gail Salaway,et al.  An Organizational Learning Approach to Information Systems Development , 1987, MIS Q..

[23]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[24]  P. Kidwell,et al.  The mythical man-month: Essays on software engineering , 1996, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[25]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: From Organization Design to Organization Designing , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[26]  Jan Gulliksen,et al.  Key principles for user-centred systems design , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[27]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  Cognitive Strategies in Architectural Design , 1979 .

[28]  Daniel Fallman,et al.  Design-oriented human-computer interaction , 2003, CHI '03.

[29]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems As a Design Science , 2007, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[31]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[32]  V. A. Howard,et al.  Varieties of thinking : essays from Harvard's Philosophy of Education Research Center , 1990 .

[33]  N. Cross Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[34]  Judith Weedman,et al.  Client as designer in collaborative design science research projects: what does social science design theory tell us? , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Cynthia Mathis Beath,et al.  The enactments and consequences of token, shared, and compliant participation in information systems development , 1996 .

[36]  J. Aken Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological Rules , 2004 .

[37]  D. Schon Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. The Jossey-Bass Higher Education Series. , 1987 .

[38]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Rethinking Management Information Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1999 .

[39]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  The Process and Product of System Design , 1978 .

[40]  Rob Kling,et al.  Learning in context: Extensively computerized work groups as communities-of-practice , 1995 .

[41]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[42]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Karl Aspelund,et al.  The Design Process , 2006 .

[44]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Managing as Designing , 2004 .

[45]  J. Aken Management Research as a Design Science: Articulating the Research Products of Mode 2 Knowledge Production in Management , 2005 .

[46]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Re-Embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[47]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The design of information systems: parti, formats and sketching , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[48]  Jr. Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Softw , 1978 .

[49]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Reflections on participatory design: lessons from the trillium experience , 1990, CHI '90.

[50]  B. Jordan Cosmopolitical obstetrics: some insights from the training of traditional midwives. , 1989, Social science & medicine.