Research on feature extraction and segmentation of rover wheel imprint

The wheel imprint photograph of the rover contains important information such as wheel motion parameters, soil characteristic parameters and movement status of the rover. Segmenting the wheel imprint area from the photograph is an important prerequisite for feature extraction and parameter identification. Traditional image segmentation cannot take both speed and precision into account because they are based on a wide range of image object attributes, such as grayscale threshold, color, texture, gradient, contrast, shape and size. This paper presents an image segmentation method based on the wheel imprint feature. Compared to other common graphics segmentation methods, the morphological characteristics and frequency domain characteristics of the wheel imprint are found out by analyzing the mechanism of the wheel–terrain interaction process, and the eigenvector is also constructed. In the wheel trace feature space, the clustering algorithm is used to divide the image into the trace area and the non-trace area. The segmentation accuracy and processing speed were used to evaluate the algorithm. The experimental results show that the developed algorithm based on the characteristics of wheel imprint formation mechanism is more accurate and efficient than the traditional method.

[1]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Markov Random Field Texture Models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Haluk Derin,et al.  Modeling and Segmentation of Noisy and Textured Images Using Gibbs Random Fields , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  Kenneth I. Laws,et al.  Rapid Texture Identification , 1980, Optics & Photonics.

[4]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[5]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[7]  Liu Zhen,et al.  Wheel Trace Imprint Image Frequency Domain Analysis and Rover Wheel Slip Ratio Estimation , 2016 .

[8]  J. MacQueen Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[9]  Mary M. Galloway,et al.  Texture analysis using gray level run lengths , 1974 .

[10]  吉田 和哉 Vision-based Estimation of Slip Angle for Mobile Robots and Planetary Rovers , 2008, ICRA 2008.

[11]  Arivazhagan Selvaraj,et al.  Texture segmentation using wavelet transform , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[12]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms , 1981, Advanced Applications in Pattern Recognition.

[13]  DingLiang,et al.  Interaction Mechanics Model for Rigid Driving Wheels of Planetary Rovers Moving on Sandy Terrain with Consideration of Multiple Physical Effects , 2015 .

[14]  J. Bezdek A Physical Interpretation of Fuzzy ISODATA , 1993 .

[15]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  A Comparative Study of Texture Measures for Terrain Classification , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  Saman A. Zonouz,et al.  CloudID: Trustworthy cloud-based and cross-enterprise biometric identification , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Jia Wei-kuan,et al.  New Theories and Methods of Image Segmentation , 2010 .

[18]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Classification of textures using Gaussian Markov random fields , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[19]  Larry A. Rendell,et al.  A Practical Approach to Feature Selection , 1992, ML.

[20]  Guangjun Liu,et al.  Interaction Mechanics Model for Rigid Driving Wheels of Planetary Rovers Moving on Sandy Terrain with Consideration of Multiple Physical Effects , 2015, J. Field Robotics.