Creative Expertise Is Associated With Transcending the Here and Now

Human imagination is bounded. As situations become more distant in time, place, perspective, and likelihood, they also become more difficult to simulate. What underlies the ability to successfully engage in distal simulations? Here we examine the psychological and neural mechanisms underlying distal simulation by studying individuals known for transcending these limits: creative experts. First, 2 behavioral studies establish that creative experts indeed succeed at engaging in vivid distal simulations, compared to less creative individuals. Performance on a traditional measure of creativity (Study 1) and real-world success in creative pursuits (Study 2) corresponded with more vivid distal simulations across temporal, spatial, social, and hypothetical domains. Study 3 used neuroimaging to identify the neural mechanism supporting creative experts’ simulation success. Whereas creative experts and controls recruit the same neural mechanism (the medial prefrontal cortex) while simulating common or proximal events, creative experts preferentially engage a distinct neural mechanism (the dorsomedial subsystem of the default network) while simulating distal events. Moreover, creative experts showed greater functional connectivity within this network at rest, suggesting they may be prepared to engage this mechanism, by default. Studying creative expertise provides new insight into the ability to mentally transcend the here and now.

[1]  Daniel M. Bartels,et al.  The future self. , 2018 .

[2]  Anna Abraham,et al.  Commentary: Creativity and Memory: Effects of an Episodic-Specificity Induction on Divergent Thinking , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[3]  R. Buckner,et al.  Functional-Anatomic Fractionation of the Brain's Default Network , 2010, Neuron.

[4]  Simon Baron-Cohen,et al.  Toward brief “Red Flags” for autism screening: The Short Autism Spectrum Quotient and the Short Quantitative Checklist for Autism in toddlers in 1,000 cases and 3,000 controls [corrected]. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[5]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Affective Forecasting , 2005 .

[6]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain , 2007, Nature.

[7]  Raymond S. Nickerson,et al.  How We Know—and Sometimes Misjudge—What Others Know: Imputing One's Own Knowledge to Others , 1999 .

[8]  D. Schacter,et al.  Constructive episodic simulation: Temporal distance and detail of past and future events modulate hippocampal engagement , 2008, Hippocampus.

[9]  T. Suddendorf,et al.  Children's Divergent Thinking Improves When They Understand False Beliefs , 1999 .

[10]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  The Reliability and Validity of Ideational Originality in the Divergent Thinking of Academically Gifted and Nongifted Children , 1985 .

[11]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Traversing psychological distance , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  R. Passingham,et al.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Janice Chen,et al.  Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension , 2016, Nature Communications.

[14]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  Growing Up Creatively Gifted: A 22-Year Longitudinal Study. , 1980 .

[15]  H. Steiner,et al.  Narration and Vividness as Measures of Event-Specificity in Autobiographical Memory , 2008 .

[16]  Carolyn Parkinson,et al.  A Common Cortical Metric for Spatial, Temporal, and Social Distance , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Nira Liberman,et al.  Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: consequences for insight and creative cognition. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Saving for the future self: neural measures of future self-continuity predict temporal discounting. , 2009, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[19]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Secret Life of Pronouns , 2003, Psychological science.

[20]  M. Runco,et al.  Scoring Divergent Thinking Tests by Computer With a Semantics-Based Algorithm , 2016, Europe's journal of psychology.

[21]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Episodic simulation and episodic memory can increase intentions to help others , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Mark H. Davis.  Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .

[23]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Reasoning about social conflicts improves into old age , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  D. Schacter,et al.  Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Donna Rose Addis,et al.  Creativity and Memory , 2015, Psychological science.

[26]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[27]  Robert P. Spunt,et al.  Folk Explanations of Behavior , 2015, Psychological science.

[28]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Temporal construal. , 2003, Psychological review.

[29]  Cynthia M. Sifonis,et al.  The Role of Specificity and Abstraction in Creative Idea Generation , 2004 .

[30]  Y. Trope,et al.  The Psychology of Transcending the Here and Now , 2008, Science.

[31]  R Saxe,et al.  People thinking about thinking people The role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind” , 2003, NeuroImage.

[32]  C. Frith,et al.  The Neural Basis of Mentalizing , 2006, Neuron.

[33]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Brain Regions That Represent Amodal Conceptual Knowledge , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Wei Liao,et al.  Musical Training Induces Functional Plasticity in Perceptual and Motor Networks: Insights from Resting-State fMRI , 2012, PloS one.

[35]  Kevin N. Ochsner,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Self- and Other Judgments Reveals a Spatial Gradient for Mentalizing in Medial Prefrontal Cortex , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Bernard Maskit,et al.  A Weighted Referential Activity Dictionary , 2006, Computing Attitude and Affect in Text.

[37]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Nicholas A. Ketz,et al.  Enhanced Brain Correlations during Rest Are Related to Memory for Recent Experiences , 2010, Neuron.

[39]  D. Bandalos,et al.  A Report on the 40-Year Follow-Up of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Alive and Well in the New Millennium , 2005 .

[40]  Kathy D. Gerlach,et al.  Future planning: default network activity couples with frontoparietal control network and reward-processing regions during process and outcome simulations. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[41]  Robert P. Spunt,et al.  The neural basis of conceptualizing the same action at different levels of abstraction. , 2016, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[42]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. , 1997 .

[43]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[44]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  The Effect of Construal Level on Subjective Probability Estimates , 2009, Psychological science.

[45]  J. Henrich,et al.  Most people are not WEIRD , 2010, Nature.

[46]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  Matthew J. Lindberg,et al.  Implications of Counterfactual Structure for Creative Generation and Analytical Problem Solving , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[48]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk , 2012, Political Analysis.

[49]  Jason P. Mitchell,et al.  The Default Network Distinguishes Construals of Proximal versus Distal Events , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  N. Kraus,et al.  Music training for the development of auditory skills , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[51]  Dermot M. Bowler,et al.  Spatial navigation, episodic memory, episodic future thinking, and theory of mind in children with autism spectrum disorder: evidence for impairments in mental simulation? , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[52]  K. Vohs,et al.  Pragmatic Prospection: How and Why People Think about the Future , 2016 .

[53]  Frank Van Overwalle,et al.  Involvement of the mentalizing network in social and non-social high construal. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[54]  Yoed N. Kenett,et al.  Robust prediction of individual creative ability from brain functional connectivity , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  When in Rome ... Learn Why the Romans Do What They Do: How Multicultural Learning Experiences Facilitate Creativity , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[56]  Fiery Cushman,et al.  Morality constrains the default representation of what is possible , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  E. Ross.  The Organization of Will , 1916, American Journal of Sociology.

[59]  Winfred Arthur,et al.  College-Sample Psychometric and Normative Data on a Short Form of the Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices Test , 1999 .

[60]  Ethan Kross,et al.  Boosting wisdom: distance from the self enhances wise reasoning, attitudes, and behavior. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[61]  Sean Murphy,et al.  Putting Feelings into Words: Cross-Linguistic Markers of the Referential Process , 2015, CLPsych@HLT-NAACL.

[62]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[63]  William W. Graves,et al.  Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[64]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Automatic processing of psychological distance: evidence from a Stroop task. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[66]  R. Buckner,et al.  Self-projection and the brain , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[67]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[68]  Evan Polman,et al.  Decisions for Others Are More Creative Than Decisions for the Self , 2011, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[69]  D. Schacter,et al.  Episodic Simulation of Future Events , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[70]  C. N. Macrae,et al.  Finding the Self? An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[71]  Nira Liberman,et al.  From mind to matter: neural correlates of abstract and concrete mindsets. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[72]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Building a motor simulation de novo: Observation of dance by dancers , 2006, NeuroImage.