'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem

'Mode 3' allows and emphasises the co-existence and co-evolution of different knowledge and innovation paradigms: the competitiveness and superiority of a knowledge system is highly determined by its adaptive capacity to combine and integrate different knowledge and innovation modes via co-evolution, co-specialisation and co-opetition knowledge stock and flow dynamics. The 'Quadruple Helix' emphasises the importance of also integrating the perspective of the media-based and culture-based public. What results is an emerging fractal knowledge and innovation ecosystem, well-configured for the knowledge economy and society.

[1]  Christian Schaller,et al.  Demokratiequalität in Österreich: Zustand und Entwicklungsperspektiven , 2003 .

[2]  Lisa C. Ehrich,et al.  Introduction and Chapter Summaries , 2009 .

[3]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1963 .

[4]  W. Steinmueller The European software sectoral system of innovation , 2004 .

[5]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Winning by Co-Opeting in Strategic Government-University-Industry R&D Partnerships: The Power of Complex, Dynamic Knowledge Networks , 1999 .

[6]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Strategy, structure, and performance issues of precompetitive R&D consortia: insights and lessons learned from SEMATECH , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[7]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Rediscovering Schumpeter : creative destruction evolving into "Mode 3" , 2007 .

[8]  Alexander Gerybadze,et al.  Globalization of R&D: recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations , 1999 .

[9]  Thomas Pfeffer,et al.  VIRTUALIZATION OF RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES: RAISING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS TO ADDRESS KEY FUNCTIONS OF THE INSTITUTION* , 2003 .

[10]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[11]  Bill Nolte Technology Life Cycle , 2006 .

[12]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Knowledge transfer through technological hyperlearning in five industries , 1999 .

[13]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  Introduction: `Mode 2' Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge , 2003 .

[14]  Philip Shapira,et al.  Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluation: Experiences from the United States and Europe , 2003 .

[15]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Future governance of innovation policy in Europe — three scenarios , 2001 .

[16]  David F. J. Campbell Nationale Forschungssysteme im Vergleich: Strukturen, Herausforderungen und Entwicklungsoptionen , 2006 .

[17]  Judith A Squires Democratic Innovation: deliberation, representation and association , 2000 .

[18]  Maria Beyrl,et al.  Politische Kommunikation in Österreich – Generalverdacht der Inszenierung? Ein Streifzug durch die österreichische Mediendemokratie , 2006 .

[19]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning London: Pint , 1995 .

[20]  Maureen McKelvey,et al.  Pharmaceuticals Analyzed through the Lens of a Sectoral Innovation System , 2004 .

[21]  P. Hall Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain , 1993 .

[22]  David F. J. Campbell,et al.  Politische Steuerung über öffentliche Förderung universitärer Forschung? Systemtheoretische Überlegungen zu Forschungsund Technologiepolitik , 2001 .

[23]  David F. J. Campbell Die Dynamik der politischen Links-rechts-Schwingungen in Österreich: Die Ergebnisse einer Expertenbefragung , 1993 .

[24]  Wolfgang C. Müller,et al.  Coalition Governments in Western Europe , 2000 .

[25]  M. Saxton,et al.  Gaining Control of the Corporate Culture , 1985 .

[26]  B. Martin,et al.  University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison , 2003 .

[27]  David F. J. Campbell Wie links oder wie rechts sind Österreichs Länder? Eine komparative Langzeitanalyse des parlamentarischen Mehrebenensystems Österreichs (1945-2007) , 2007 .

[28]  Alfonso Gambardella,et al.  The Chemical Sector al System. Firms, markets, institutions and the processes of knowledge creation and diffusion , 2001 .

[29]  Stuart A. Umpleby What I learned from Heinz von Foerster about the construction of science , 2005 .

[30]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Measuring intangibles: managing intangibles for tangible outcomes in research and innovation , 2004 .

[31]  H. Etzkowitz Research groups as ???quasi-firms???: the invention of the entrepreneurial university , 2003 .

[32]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[33]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development , 2002 .

[34]  Don E. Kash,et al.  The Complexity Challenge: Technological Innovation for the 21st Century , 1999 .

[35]  V. Bush Science, the Endless Frontier , 1999, Science, the Endless Frontier.

[36]  E.G. Carayannis,et al.  Strategy, structure and performance issues of pre-competitive R&D consortia: insights and lessons learned from SEMATECH , 2001, PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199).

[37]  David F. J. Campbell,et al.  European Nation-State under Pressure: National Fragmentation or the Evolution of Suprastate Structures? , 1994 .

[38]  E. Andersen,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[39]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  e-Development Toward the Knowledge Economy: Leveraging Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship for "Smart" Development , 2005 .

[40]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Architecting gloCal (global–local), real-virtual incubator networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies: lessons learned and best practices from current development and business incubation practices , 2005 .

[41]  Fritz Plasser,et al.  Global Political Campaigning: A Worldwide Analysis of Campaign Professionals and Their Practices , 2002 .

[42]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Global and Local Knowledge: Glocal Transatlantic Public-Private Partnerships for Research and Technological Development , 2006 .

[43]  C. Lindblom,et al.  Usable Knowledge, Social Science and Social Problem Solving , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[44]  R. Florida The Rise of the Creative Class : And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life , 2003 .

[45]  Christoph-Friedrich von Braun The Innovation War , 1996 .

[46]  Guillermo O’Donnell,et al.  Human Development, Human Rights, and Democracy , 2004 .

[47]  L. Hooghe,et al.  Multi-Level Governance and European Integration , 2001 .

[48]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[49]  Yukio Miyata,et al.  An Analysis of Research and Innovative Activities of Universities in the United States , 2003 .

[50]  A. Elzinga The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[51]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  The Nature and Dynamics of Discontinuous and Disruptive Innovations from a Learning and Knowledge Management Perspective , 2003 .

[52]  Stuart A. Umpleby,et al.  Cybernetics of Conceptual Systems , 1997, Cybern. Syst..

[53]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  An Overview of Innovation , 2009 .

[54]  C. Lindblom THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[55]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[56]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[57]  Wolfgang H. Güttel,et al.  Knowledge production of firms: research networks and the "scientification" of business R&D , 2005, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[58]  Gregory Tassey,et al.  R&D Policy Models and Data Needs , 2001 .

[59]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Transatlantic Innovation Infrastructure Networks: Public-Private, Eu-Us R&D Partnerships , 2004 .

[60]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Creativity and Innovation = Competitiveness? When, How, and Why , 2003 .

[61]  Elias G. Carayannis Strategic Management of Technological Learning , 2000 .

[62]  M. Albornoz Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[63]  Stuart A. Umpleby,et al.  SHOULD KNOWLEDGE OF MANAGEMENT BE ORGANIZED AS THEORIES OR AS METHODS , 2002 .

[64]  R. Jones,et al.  Intelligence in a Democracy , 1976 .

[65]  Maximilian von Zedtwitz,et al.  Innovation in Clusters and the Liability of Foreignness of International R&D , 2006 .

[66]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Investigation and validation of technological learning versus market performance , 2000 .

[67]  Robert Kaiser,et al.  The reconfiguration of National Innovation Systems—the example of German biotechnology , 2004 .

[68]  K. Green National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .