Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Repair of Scrotal Inguinal Hernias

Background: Scrotal inguinal hernias represent a challenging surgical pathology. Although some advanced laparoscopists can repair these hernias through a minimally invasive approach, open repair is considered the technique of choice for most surgeons. The purpose of this study is to show our results of robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair of scrotal inguinal hernias. Patients and Methods: We reviewed the charts of 14 patients with inguinoscrotal hernias who underwent robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair. Mean follow-up was 7 months. The European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernia Quality of Life score, a 90-point scale, was utilized to quantify patient reported outcomes. Results: Robotic TAPP repair was successful in all 14 patients. Average case duration was 100 minutes (78 to 140 min) for unilateral hernias and 208 minutes (166 to 238 min) for bilateral hernias. Trainees were involved in 93% (13/14) of cases. There were no recurrences. Three patients developed postoperative seromas. The mean European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernia Quality of Life score was 3.7 (0 to 10). Conclusions: Scrotal hernias can be safely repaired using robotic-assisted TAPP methods with low morbidity and favorable patient reported outcomes.

[1]  Joshua Peloquin,et al.  Long-term quality of life and outcomes following robotic assisted TAPP inguinal hernia repair , 2018, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[2]  G. Eslick,et al.  Transabdominal Pre-Peritoneal Versus Open Repair for Primary Unilateral Inguinal Hernia: A Meta-analysis , 2018, World Journal of Surgery.

[3]  J. Mehaffey,et al.  Inguinal hernia repair: is there a benefit to using the robot? , 2018, Surgical Endoscopy.

[4]  L. Jørgensen,et al.  Comparison of hernia registries: the CORE project , 2018, Hernia.

[5]  F. Köckerling,et al.  Seroma following transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP): incidence, risk factors, and preventive measures , 2017, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  Y. Sekino,et al.  Laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy , 2017, Hernia.

[7]  D. Dalela,et al.  Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Repair of Extraperitoneal Ureteral Inguinal Hernia with Mesh Placement , 2017, Journal of endourology case reports.

[8]  E. Felix,et al.  Critical View of the Myopectineal Orifice. , 2017, Annals of Surgery.

[9]  A. Vanlander,et al.  A prospective, multicenter, observational study on quality of life after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with ProGrip laparoscopic, self-fixating mesh according to the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life Instrument. , 2016, Surgery.

[10]  R. Baucom,et al.  Patient reported outcomes after incisional hernia repair-establishing the ventral hernia recurrence inventory. , 2016, American journal of surgery.

[11]  M. Herman,et al.  Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair , 2016, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[12]  A. Gonzalez,et al.  Feasibility of robotic inguinal hernia repair, a single-institution experience , 2016, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  D. Canter,et al.  Case report of a robotic‐assisted laparoscopic repair of a giant incarcerated recurrent inguinal hernia containing bladder and ureters , 2015, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[14]  Thomas Langø,et al.  European association of endoscopic surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery , 2015, Surgical Endoscopy.

[15]  F. Köckerling,et al.  Tailored Approach in Inguinal Hernia Repair – Decision Tree Based on the Guidelines , 2014, Front. Surg..

[16]  A. Yuan,et al.  Totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty versus open extraperitoneal approach for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of outcomes of our current knowledge. , 2014, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[17]  Gyusung I. Lee,et al.  Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[18]  S. L. Siow,et al.  Laparoscopic transabdominal approach and its modified technique for incarcerated scrotal hernias. , 2013, Asian journal of surgery.

[19]  J. Daes Endoscopic repair of large inguinoscrotal hernias: management of the distal sac to avoid seroma formation , 2014, Hernia.

[20]  F. Agresta,et al.  Inguinal-scrotal hernias in young patients: is laparoscopic repair a possible answer? Preliminary results of a single-institution experience with a transabdominal preperitoneal approach , 2010, Hernia.

[21]  M. Misra,et al.  Massive scrotal hernias: problems and solutions. , 2009, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[22]  W. Jeong,et al.  Robotic repair of scrotal bladder hernia during robotic prostatectomy , 2008, Journal of robotic surgery.

[23]  K. A. Cullen,et al.  National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2005 annual summary with detailed diagnosis and procedure data. , 2007, Vital and health statistics. Series 13, Data from the National Health Survey.

[24]  C. Palanivelu,et al.  Modified Technique of Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Hernioplasty for Irreducible Scrotal Hernias (Omentoceles): How to Remove the Hernial Contents , 2007, World Journal of Surgery.

[25]  F. Corcione,et al.  The European hernia society groin hernia classication: simple and easy to remember , 2007, Hernia.

[26]  Karl Kaiser,et al.  An European , 2004 .

[27]  K. Kraft,et al.  Scrotal hernias: a contraindication for an endoscopic procedure? , 2000, Surgical Endoscopy.