Game Mining: How to Make Money from Those About to Play a Game

It is known that a player in a noncooperative game can benefit by publicly re- stricting their possible moves before start of play. We show that, more generally, a player may benefit by publicly committing to pay an external party an amount that is contingent on the game's outcome. We explore what happens when external parties (who we call game miners) discover this fact and seek to profit from it by entering an outcome-contingent contract with the players. We analyze various bargaining games between miners and players for determining such an outcome- contingent contract. We establish restrictions on the strategic settings in which a game miner can profit, and bounds on the game miner's profit given various structured bargaining games. These bargaining games include playing the players against one another, as well as allowing the players to pay the miner(s) for exclu- sivity and first-mover advantage. We also establish that when all players can enter contracts with miners, to guarantee the existence of equilibria it is necessary to assume that players can randomize over the contracts they make.

[1]  R. Coase,et al.  The Problem of Social Cost , 1960, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[2]  J. Nash THE BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1950, Classics in Game Theory.

[3]  David Wolpert,et al.  Strategic Choice of Preferences: The Persona Model , 2010 .

[4]  M. Katz Game-Playing Agents: Unobservable Contracts as Precommitments , 1991 .

[5]  Julian C. Jamison,et al.  Evolution and Rationality: Schelling formalized , 2012 .

[6]  Richard Romano,et al.  On the endogeneity of Cournot-Nash and Stackelberg equilibria: games of accumulation , 2005, J. Econ. Theory.

[7]  E. Kalai,et al.  OTHER SOLUTIONS TO NASH'S BARGAINING PROBLEM , 1975 .

[8]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  Endogenous games and mechanisms: Side payments among players , 2005 .

[9]  C. Fershtman,et al.  Equilibrium Incentives in Oligopoly , 1984 .

[10]  Joel Sobel,et al.  Distortion of Utilities and the Bargaining Problem , 1981 .

[11]  Levent Koçkesen,et al.  Strategic Effects of Renegotiation-Proof Contracts , 2012 .

[12]  U. Sunde,et al.  Consensual and Conflictual Democratization , 2006 .

[13]  C. Fershtman,et al.  Observable Contracts: Strategic Delegation and Cooperation , 1991 .

[14]  Bengt Holmstrom,et al.  Moral Hazard in Teams , 1982 .

[15]  S. Sklivas The Strategic Choice of Managerial Incentives , 1987 .

[16]  J.P.M. Hurkens,et al.  Endogenous Stackelberg leadership , 1999 .

[17]  Adam Tauman Kalai,et al.  A commitment folk theorem , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[18]  Adam Tauman Kalai,et al.  Voluntary commitments lead to efficiency , 2007 .

[19]  Ludovic Renou,et al.  Commitment games , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[20]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Distribution-Valued Solution Concepts , 2013 .

[21]  Chaim Fershtman,et al.  Managerial incentives as a strategic variable in duopolistic environment , 1985 .

[22]  Ignacio García-Jurado,et al.  The role of commitment in repeated games , 2006 .

[23]  J. Vickers Delegation and the Theory of the Firm , 1985 .

[24]  Jonathan H. Hamilton,et al.  Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or cournot equilibria , 1990 .

[25]  Eric van Damme,et al.  Commitment Robust Equilibria and Endogenous Timing , 1996 .

[26]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Statistical Prediction of the Outcome of a Noncooperative Game , 2008 .