Image and isocentre management in the paperless age: an automated decision making model
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J W Denham,et al. Objective decision-making following a portal film: the results of a pilot study. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[2] H Shirato,et al. Use of an implanted marker and real-time tracking of the marker for the positioning of prostate and bladder cancers. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[3] D Yan,et al. A new model for "accept or reject" strategies in off-line and on-line megavoltage treatment evaluation. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[4] Sarah A. Martin. Accept or reject? , 2010, Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & Practitioners.
[5] D P Dearnaley,et al. A randomised trial of patient repositioning during radiotherapy using a megavoltage imaging system. , 1994, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[6] M van Herk,et al. Automatic on-line inspection of patient setup in radiation therapy using digital portal images. , 1993, Medical physics.
[7] R. Louwe,et al. Off-line setup corrections only marginally reduce the number of on-line corrections for prostate radiotherapy using implanted gold markers. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[8] Michael G Herman,et al. Technical aspects of daily online positioning of the prostate for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy using an electronic portal imaging device. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[9] M van Herk,et al. A verification procedure to improve patient set-up accuracy using portal images. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[10] M van Herk,et al. A comprehensive system for the analysis of portal images. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[11] James M. Balter,et al. A comparison of computer‐controlled versus manual on‐line patient setup adjustment , 2002, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.
[12] J Wong,et al. Setup error in radiotherapy: on-line correction using electronic kilovoltage and megavoltage radiographs. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[13] H Alasti,et al. Portal imaging for evaluation of daily on-line setup errors and off-line organ motion during conformal irradiation of carcinoma of the prostate. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[14] J Pouliot,et al. Verification and correction of setup deviations in tangential breast irradiation using EPID: gain versus workload. , 1996, Medical physics.
[15] M Coghe,et al. Routine clinical on-line portal imaging followed by immediate field adjustment using a tele-controlled patient couch. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[16] P. Dunscombe,et al. Quantitative vs. subjective portal verification using digital portal images. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[17] A. See,et al. Online versus offline corrections: opposition or evolution? A comparison of two electronic portal imaging approaches for locally advanced prostate cancer , 2006 .
[18] A Dutreix,et al. Black and white in accuracy assessment of megavoltage images: the medical decision is often grey. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[19] Di Yan,et al. Comparison of various online IGRT strategies: The benefits of online treatment plan re-optimization. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.