Digital technology adoption and knowledge flows within firms: Can the Internet overcome geographic and technological distance?

Under what conditions does digital technology adoption increase cross location knowledge flows within firms? We investigate this question by studying the impact of adopting basic Internet access on cross-location knowledge flows within the same firm. We construct a large data set of Internet adoption and patent citations among dyadic pairs of firm-locations between 1992-1998. We find that when both locations in the pair adopt basic Internet there is an increase in the likelihood of a citation between the citing and (potential) cited location. In contrast, we find no significant effect of Internet adoption at only the citing location. We further study how this effect varies according to the proximity of the research activities between the source and recipient of knowledge and specialization of the research activities within the recipient. We find that the likelihood of a citation increases more after dyadic Internet adoption when the pair is working in similar research areas and when the research areas in the citing location are less specialized. These results, which are robust to a range of robustness analyses, suggest that digital technologies such as Internet connectivity are able to facilitate knowledge flows between locations only when they share a common knowledge base.

[1]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[2]  Megan J. MacGarvie.  Do Firms Learn from International Trade? , 2006, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[3]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[4]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[5]  T. Bresnahan,et al.  Technical Progress and Co-Invention in Computing and in the Use of Computers , 1996 .

[6]  Kristina McElheran.  Delegation in Multi‐Establishment Firms: Evidence from I.T. Purchasing , 2014 .

[7]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Location, Decentralization, and Knowledge Sources for Innovation , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[8]  M. Mobius,et al.  Getting Closer or Drifting Apart , 2004 .

[9]  Edward L. Glaeser,et al.  Information Technology and the Future of Cities , 1996 .

[10]  Enno Siemsen,et al.  Colocation Still Matters: Conformance Quality and the Interdependence of R&D and Manufacturing in the Pharmaceutical Industry , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[12]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[13]  Luis Garicano,et al.  Hierarchies and the Organization of Knowledge in Production , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  S. Athey,et al.  The impact of information technology on emergency health care outcomes. , 2002, The Rand journal of economics.

[15]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Global Village or Cyberbalkans: Modeling and Measuring the Integration of Electronic Communities , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[17]  J. Jordan,et al.  Assessing your company's knowledge management style , 1997 .

[18]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Restructuring Research: Communication Costs and the Democratization of University Innovation , 2006 .

[19]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Close to You? Bias and Precision in Patent-Based Measures of Technological Proximity , 2007 .

[20]  Shu Han,et al.  Mitigating Diminishing Returns to R&D: The Role of Information Technology in Innovation , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  John Van Reenen,et al.  Americans Do I.T. Better: US Multinationals and the Productivity Miracle , 2007 .

[22]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Computing Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence , 2003 .

[23]  Benjamin F. Jones.  The Burden of Knowledge and the &Apos;Death of the Renaissance Man&Apos;: Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2005 .

[24]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[25]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  The Use of Knowledge for Technological Innovation Within Diversified Firms , 2007 .

[27]  S. Greenstein,et al.  The Role of Differentiation Strategy in Local Telecommunication Entry and Market Evolution: 1999-2002 , 2006 .

[28]  L. Hitt,et al.  Data Analytics Skills, Innovation and Firm Productivity , 2018 .

[29]  W. Souder,et al.  An information transfer model for integrating marketing and R&D Personnel in new product development projects , 1990 .

[30]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Minyuan Zhao,et al.  Local R&D Strategies and Multilocation Firms: The Role of Internal Linkages , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[32]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  How did location affect adoption of the commercial Internet? Global village vs. urban leadership , 2005 .

[33]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Connecting minds: computer-mediated communication and scientific work , 2000 .

[34]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[35]  M. Feldman,et al.  The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography , 2011 .

[36]  Francesca Lotti,et al.  Evidence on the impact of R&D and ICT investments on innovation and productivity in Italian firms , 2012 .

[37]  Steve Offsey,et al.  Knowledge Management: Linking People to Knowledge for Bottom Line Results , 1997, J. Knowl. Manag..

[38]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[39]  Shane Greenstein,et al.  Information Technology and the Distribution of Inventive Activity , 2014 .

[40]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[41]  J. Shaver,et al.  Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms , 2005 .

[42]  W. Powell.  Learning from Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries , 1998 .

[43]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[44]  B. Silverman,et al.  R&D, ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CORPORATE TECHNOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE , 2004 .

[45]  Jasjit Singh.  Distributed R&D, Cross-Regional Knowledge Integration and Quality of Innovative Output , 2006 .

[46]  P. Thompson,et al.  Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment , 2005 .

[47]  Christian Catalini,et al.  Microgeography and the Direction of Inventive Activity , 2017, Manag. Sci..

[48]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Could the Internet Balkanize Science? , 1996, Science.

[49]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Academic Scientists' Productivity and Collaboration Patterns , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[51]  Minyuan Zhao,et al.  Doing R & D in Countries with Weak IPR Protection : Can Corporate Management Substitute for Legal Institutions ? , 2004 .

[52]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[53]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[54]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Stylized Facts in the Geography of Innovation , 2010 .

[55]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables , 1993 .

[56]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[57]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact , 2013, Science.

[58]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[59]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World , 2017, MIS Q..

[60]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[61]  D. Teece.  Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How , 1977 .

[62]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[63]  F. Nagle.  Open Source Software and Firm Productivity , 2017 .

[64]  Edward G. Anderson,et al.  Managing Distributed Product Development Projects: Integration Strategies for Time Zone and Language Barriers , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..

[65]  P. Puranam,et al.  Integrating Distributed Work: Comparing Task Design, Communication and Tacit Coordination Mechanisms , 2008 .

[66]  Nicolas van Zeebroeck,et al.  From Wires to Partners: How the Internet Has Fostered R&D Collaborations within Firms , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[67]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies, 1st Edition , 2014 .

[68]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Recombinant Search and Breakthrough Idea Generation: An Analysis of High Impact Papers in the Social Sciences , 2011 .

[69]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[70]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization , 1988 .

[71]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[72]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[73]  C. Ai,et al.  Interaction terms in logit and probit models , 2003 .

[74]  Landon Kleis,et al.  Information Technology and Intangible Output: The Impact of IT Investment on Innovation Productivity , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[75]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  Issues in measuring the degree of technological specialisation with patent data , 2006, Scientometrics.

[76]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .