Perceptions of the effectiveness of sport organisations: The case of intercollegiate athletics

The organisational effectiveness (OE) construct is something of an enigma. While OE is at the theoretical centre of all organisational models and is the ultimate dependent variable of organisational studies, despite more than 60 years of research on the topic, substantial challenges concerning how to. conceptualise, measure, and explain OE remain. In this paper we build on the consensus that has emerged in the literature that the construct space of OE includes a wide variety of criteria and that assessments of OE are a function of one's priorities. The purpose of the paper is to address an issue essentially ignored in the literature ‐ relationships among the attributes that contribute to perceptions of OE. In an effort to accomplish our purpose, we present a preliminary study conducted within the context of intercollegiate athletics. The case study was designed to establish: (a) the factors that are the most important determinants of perceptions of effectiveness, and (b) how these factors interact with one another. Content analyses of interviews with ten salient stakeholders revealed that six factors are essential determinants of perceptions of athletic program success. These factors are related to athletic performance on the field, student‐athlete education, program ethics, and the effects of programs on a university's image, resources, and institutional enthusiasm. Thematic mapping of the interviews revealed that, while determinants of perceptions of success often work in concert with one another, some determinants tend to influence perceptions of success on their own. We conclude by discussing the theoretical and pragmatic relevance of addressing relationships among OE attributes and by suggesting promising research directions.

[1]  R. L. Simon,et al.  The Game of Life: College Sports and Educational Values By James L. Shulman and William G. Bowen. Published 2001 by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, NJ 08540. (447 pp.) , 2002 .

[2]  Emmanuel Bayle,et al.  Development of a taxonomy of performance for national sport organizations , 2002 .

[3]  Terry C. Blum,et al.  Work-family human resource bundles and perceived organizational performance , 2000 .

[4]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Serving Constituencies In Business Schools: M.B.A. Program Versus Research Performance , 2000 .

[5]  P. Pedersen Unpaid Professionals: Commercialism and Conflict in Big-Time College Sports , 2000 .

[6]  D. Papadimitriou,et al.  Organisational Effectiveness of Hellenic National Sports Organisations: A Multiple Constituency Approach , 2000 .

[7]  B. Goff Effects of university athletics on the university: a review and extension of empirical assessment. , 2000 .

[8]  P. Chelladurai,et al.  Perceptions of goals and processes of intercollegiate athletics: a case study. , 2000 .

[9]  David R. Hannah,et al.  The Cultural Significance of Athletics in U.S. Higher Education , 2000 .

[10]  Marla A. Bennett College Athletes for Hire: The Evolution of the NCAA's Amateur Myth , 2000, History of Education Quarterly.

[11]  D. Putler,et al.  Perceptions of Intercollegiate Athletic Programs: Priorities and Tradeoffs , 1999 .

[12]  John Wolohan College Athletes for Hire: The Evolution and Legacy of the NCAA’s Amateur Myth , 1999 .

[13]  B. Burnes Recipes for organisational effectiveness. Mad, bad, or just dangerous to know? , 1998 .

[14]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Group Support Systems , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[15]  James G. March,et al.  Crossroads---Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable , 1997 .

[16]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[17]  John R. Gerdy The Successful College Athletic Program: The New Standard (American Council on Education Oryx Press Series on Higher Education) , 1997 .

[18]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Competing Values in Organizations: Contextual Influences and Structural Consequences , 1996 .

[19]  V. Baxter,et al.  Competition, Legitimation, and the Regulation of Intercollegiate Athletics , 1996 .

[20]  John R. Thelin Games Colleges Play. Scandal and Reform in Intercollegiate Athletics. , 1995 .

[21]  Ilze Zigurs,et al.  A Group Support Systems Approach to Cognitive Mapping , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  신택현,et al.  조직효과성(Organizational Effectiveness)에 대한 새로운 관점 , 1993 .

[23]  P. Chelladurai,et al.  The structure and processes of Synchro Canada. , 1992 .

[24]  P. Chelladurai,et al.  Measures of organizational effectiveness of Canadian national sport organizations. , 1991, Canadian journal of sport sciences = Journal canadien des sciences du sport.

[25]  Gary D. Funk Major Violation: The Unbalanced Priorities in Athletics and Academics , 1991 .

[26]  R. Weber Basic Content Analysis , 1986 .

[27]  W. Frisby The Organizational Structure and Effectiveness of Voluntary Organizations: The Case of Canadian National Sport Governing Bodies , 1986 .

[28]  W. Frisby Measuring the organizational effectiveness of National Sport Governing Bodies. , 1986, Canadian journal of applied sport sciences. Journal canadien des sciences appliquees au sport.

[29]  A. Lewin,et al.  Determining organizational effectiveness: another look, and an agenda for research , 1986 .

[30]  K. Cameron Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness , 1986 .

[31]  Raymond F. Zammuto,et al.  A comparison of multiple constituency models of organizational effectiveness , 1984 .

[32]  Gerald R. Salancik,et al.  A Single Value Function for Evaluating Organizations with Multiple Constituencies , 1984 .

[33]  P. Chelladurai,et al.  Operative goals of intercollegiate athletics: perceptions of athletic administrators. , 1984, Canadian journal of applied sport sciences. Journal canadien des sciences appliquees au sport.

[34]  M. Keeley Impartiality and Participant-Interest Theories of Organizational Effectiveness. , 1984 .

[35]  D. Whetten,et al.  Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models , 1984 .

[36]  John Rohrbaugh,et al.  A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis , 1983 .

[37]  K. Cameron The enigma of organizational effectiveness , 1981 .

[38]  L Campbell,et al.  A factor analytic study of effectiveness criteria in intercollegiate athletics. , 1981, Canadian journal of applied sport sciences. Journal canadien des sciences appliquees au sport.

[39]  Kim S. Cameron,et al.  Critical questions in assessing organizational effectiveness , 1980 .

[40]  Stuart Jay Deutsch,et al.  Organizational Effectiveness: A Multiple-Constituency Approach , 1980 .

[41]  P. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook , 1978 .

[42]  M Keeley,et al.  A social-justice approach to organizational evaluation. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[43]  Gail A. Herndon The chronicle of higher education , 1977 .

[44]  K. Arrow Higher education as a filter , 1973 .

[45]  E. Yuchtman,et al.  A System Resource Approach to Organizational Effectiveness , 1967 .

[46]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  Two Approaches to Organizational Analysis: A Critique and A Suggestion , 1960 .

[47]  Richard A. Wolfe,et al.  How Tight Are the Ties that Bind Stakeholder Groups? , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[48]  A. Dennis,et al.  Serving Multiple Constituencies in the Business School: MBA Program vs. Research Performance , 2000 .

[49]  Murray Sperber,et al.  Beer and circus : how big-time college sports is crippling undergraduate education , 2000 .

[50]  W. Bowen,et al.  The Game of Life: College Sports and Educational Values , 2000 .

[51]  James J. Duderstadt,et al.  Intercollegiate Athletics and the American University: A University President's Perspective , 2000 .

[52]  Welch Suggs 10 Years Later, Another Look at Big-Time College Sports. , 2000 .

[53]  P. D. Knop,et al.  The development of an instrument with wich sportfederations can evaluate and optimize their management , 1994 .

[54]  Susan Phillips Dawson,et al.  CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT IN ACTION Applying Quality Principles to Software , 1994 .

[55]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation , 1993 .

[56]  M. Sperber College Sports Inc.: The Athletic Department vs. the University. , 1990 .

[57]  P. Chelladurai Multidimensionality and Multiple Perspectives of Organizational Effectiveness , 1987 .

[58]  Lawrence B. Mohr 10 – The Implications of Effectiveness Theory for Managerial Practice in the Public Sector , 1983 .

[59]  Walter R. Nord,et al.  5 – A Political–Economic Perspective on Organizational Effectiveness , 1983 .

[60]  S Ramnarayan,et al.  Organizational Effectiveness: An Alternative Perspective , 1983 .

[61]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[62]  K. Krippendorff Krippendorff, Klaus, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980. , 1980 .