Technology-enhanced suicide prevention interventions: A systematic review

Objective Suicide prevention is a high priority. Scalable and sustainable interventions for suicide prevention are needed to set the stage for population-level impact. This systematic review explores how technology-enhanced interventions target suicide risk and protective factors, using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 2015) Risk and Protective Factors Ecological Model. Methods Information databases (PsycINFO, PubMed and CINAHL) were systematically searched and records including technology-enhanced interventions for suicide prevention (n = 3764) were reviewed. Records with varying technologies and diverse methodologies were integrated into the search. Results Review of the records resulted in the inclusion of 16 studies that utilized technology-enhanced interventions to address determinants of suicidal behaviour. This includes the use of standalone or, in most cases, adjunct technology-enhanced interventions for suicide prevention delivered by mobile phone application, text message, telephone, computer, web, CD-ROM and video. Conclusion Intervention effectiveness was variable, but several technology-enhanced interventions have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing suicidal ideation and mental health co-morbidities. Large-scale research and evaluation initiatives are needed to evaluate the costs and long-term population-level impact of these interventions.

[1]  R. Aseltine,et al.  An outcome evaluation of the SOS Suicide Prevention Program. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[2]  R. Whittemore,et al.  The integrative review: updated methodology. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[3]  A. Ahmadi,et al.  Prevention of self-immolation by community-based intervention. , 2007, Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries.

[4]  Danuta Wasserman,et al.  Effectiveness of brief intervention and contact for suicide attempters: a randomized controlled trial in five countries. , 2008, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[5]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement , 2009, BMJ.

[6]  C. Bell,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of primary care physician motivational interviewing versus brief advice to engage adolescents with an Internet-based depression prevention intervention: 6-month outcomes and predictors of improvement. , 2011, Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[7]  Filip Smit,et al.  Reducing Suicidal Ideation: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Unguided Web-Based Self-help , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  Sisira Edirippulige,et al.  Journal round up , 2012 .

[9]  C. Bell,et al.  Randomized Clinical Trial of a Primary Care Internet-based Intervention to Prevent Adolescent Depression: One-year Outcomes. , 2013, Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent.

[10]  V. Vallès,et al.  Effectiveness of a telephone management programme for patients discharged from an emergency department after a suicide attempt: controlled study in a Spanish population. , 2013, Journal of affective disorders.

[11]  Y. Liu,et al.  An intervention and follow-up study following a suicide attempt in the emergency departments of four general hospitals in Shenyang, China. , 2013, Crisis.

[12]  F. Kay-Lambkin,et al.  Incidental treatment effects of CBT on suicidal ideation and hopelessness. , 2013, Journal of affective disorders.

[13]  A. van Straten,et al.  Effectiveness of Online Self-Help for Suicidal Thoughts: Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  R. Kravitz,et al.  The Effect of Targeted and Tailored Patient Depression Engagement Interventions on Patient–Physician Discussion of Suicidal Thoughts: A Randomized Control Trial , 2014, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[15]  Andreas Maercker,et al.  Internet-based versus face-to-face cognitive-behavioral intervention for depression: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. , 2014, Journal of affective disorders.

[16]  M. Maracy,et al.  The efficacy of telephonic follow up in prevention of suicidal reattempt in patients with suicide attempt history , 2014, Advanced biomedical research.

[17]  Julia E Hoffman,et al.  A Virtual Hope Box smartphone app as an accessory to therapy: proof-of-concept in a clinical sample of veterans. , 2015, Suicide & life-threatening behavior.

[18]  Adam G. Horwitz,et al.  Online suicide risk screening and intervention with college students: a pilot randomized controlled trial. , 2015, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[19]  Anne E. Rhodes,et al.  Les soins médicaux de jeunes hommes et de jeunes femmes qui décèdent par suicide , 2018, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[20]  Amanda K. Gilmore,et al.  Perceived benefits of psychotherapy via telemedicine based on suicide risk severity. , 2018, General hospital psychiatry.

[21]  Beatriz Sainz de Abajo,et al.  A Systematic Literature Review of Technologies for Suicidal Behavior Prevention , 2018, Journal of Medical Systems.

[22]  Philippe Lenca,et al.  Toward mHealth Brief Contact Interventions in Suicide Prevention: Case Series From the Suicide Intervention Assisted by Messages (SIAM) Randomized Controlled Trial , 2018, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.