Sensorimotor uncertainty modulates corticospinal excitability during skilled object manipulation

Sensorimotor memory built through previous hand-object interactions allows subjects to plan grasp forces. The memory-based mechanism is particularly effective when contact points on the object do not change across multiple manipulations, thus allowing subjects to generate the same forces in a feedforward fashion. However, allowing subjects to choose where to grasp an object causes trial-to-trial variability in fingertip positioning, suggesting a decreased ability to predict where the object will be grasped. In this scenario, subjects modulate forces on a trial-to-trial basis as a function of fingertip positioning. We suggested that this fingertip force-to-position modulation could be implemented by transforming feedback of digit placement into an accurate distribution of fingertip forces. Thus, decreasing certainty of fingertip position on an object would cause a shift from predominantly memory- to feedback-based force control mechanisms. To gain further insight into these sensorimotor transformation mechanisms, we asked subjects to grasp and lift an object with an asymmetrical center of mass while preventing it from tilting. To isolate the effect of digit placement uncertainty, we designed two experimental conditions that differed in terms of predictability of fingertip position but had similar average fingertip positioning and force distribution. We measured corticospinal excitability to probe possible changes in sensorimotor processing associated with digit placement uncertainty. We found a differential effect of sensorimotor uncertainty after but not before object contact. Our results suggest that sensorimotor integration is rapidly tuned after object contact based on different processing demands for memory versus feedback mechanisms underlying the control of manipulative forces. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The relative contribution of predictive and feedback mechanisms for scaling digit forces to position during dexterous manipulation depends on the predictability of where the object will be grasped. We found that corticospinal excitability shortly after contact was sensitive to digit position predictability. This supports the proposition that distinct sensorimotor integration processes are engaged, depending on the role of feedback about digit placement versus sensorimotor memory in controlling manipulative forces.

[1]  Marco Santello,et al.  Transfer of Learned Manipulation following Changes in Degrees of Freedom , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Santello,et al.  Anticipatory Control of Grasping: Independence of Sensorimotor Memories for Kinematics and Kinetics , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  M. Santello,et al.  Corticospinal excitability underlying digit force planning for grasping in humans. , 2014, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  P. Haggard,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation over human secondary somatosensory cortex disrupts perception of pain intensity , 2013, Cortex.

[5]  M. Santello Dexterous Manipulation , 2018, Reach-to-Grasp Behavior.

[6]  M. Santello,et al.  Role of human premotor dorsal region in learning a conditional visuomotor task. , 2017, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  J. Rothwell,et al.  How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition , 2009, Cortex.

[8]  Marco Santello,et al.  Manipulation after object rotation reveals independent sensorimotor memory representations of digit positions and forces. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  J. Gordon,et al.  Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. I. Spatial errors. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  N. Bolognini,et al.  Seeing touch in the somatosensory cortex: A TMS study of the visual perception of touch , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[11]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  R. Johansson,et al.  Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  E. Wassermann,et al.  A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  R. Johansson,et al.  Factors influencing the force control during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  J. Gordon,et al.  Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. II. Effects of visual information on accuracy. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  C Ghez,et al.  Trajectory control in targeted force impulses , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  J. Randall Flanagan,et al.  Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  Marco Santello,et al.  Extraction of Time and Frequency Features From Grip Force Rates During Dexterous Manipulation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  M. Santello,et al.  Anticipatory Planning and Control of Grasp Positions and Forces for Dexterous Two-Digit Manipulation , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  R. Lemon Functional properties of monkey motor cortex neurones receiving afferent input from the hand and fingers , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  P Jenmalm,et al.  Visual and Somatosensory Information about Object Shape Control Manipulative Fingertip Forces , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  M. Jeannerod The timing of natural prehension movements. , 1984, Journal of motor behavior.

[25]  Louise P. Kirsch,et al.  Information about the Weight of Grasped Objects from Vision and Internal Models Interacts within the Primary Motor Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Marco Santello,et al.  Neural Representations of Sensorimotor Memory- and Digit Position-Based Load Force Adjustments Before the Onset of Dexterous Object Manipulation , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Andrew Pruszynski,et al.  Primary motor cortex underlies multi-joint integration for fast feedback control , 2011, Nature.

[28]  R. Johansson,et al.  Corticospinal control during reach, grasp, and precision lift in man , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[29]  K. J. Cole,et al.  Sensory-motor coordination during grasping and manipulative actions , 1992, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[30]  S. Lisanby,et al.  Electric field depth–focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: Simulation comparison of 50 coil designs , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[31]  Marco Santello,et al.  Choice of Contact Points during Multidigit Grasping: Effect of Predictability of Object Center of Mass Location , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Marco Davare,et al.  Ventral premotor to primary motor cortical interactions during object-driven grasp in humans , 2009, Cortex.