Second-Order Asymptotic Optimality in Multisensor Sequential Change Detection

A generalized multisensor sequential change detection problem is considered, in which a number of (possibly correlated) sensors monitor an environment in real time, the joint distribution of their observations is determined by a global parameter vector, and at some unknown time there is a change in an unknown subset of components of this parameter vector. The goal is to detect the change as soon as possible, while controlling the rate of false alarms. We establish the second-order asymptotic optimality (with respect to Lorden's criterion) of various generalizations of the CUSUM rule; that is, we show that their additional expected worst case detection delay (relative to the one that could be achieved if the affected subset was known) remains bounded as the rate of false alarm goes to 0, for any possible subset of affected components. This general framework incorporates the traditional multisensor setup in which only an unknown subset of sensors is affected by the change. The latter problem has a special structure which we exploit in order to obtain feasible representations of the proposed schemes. We present the results of a simulation study where we compare the proposed schemes with scalable detection rules that are only first-order asymptotically optimal. Finally, in the special case that the change affects exactly one sensor, we consider the scheme that runs in parallel the local CUSUM rules and study the problem of specifying the local thresholds.

[1]  Yajun Mei,et al.  Quickest detection in censoring sensor networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings.

[2]  A. Willsky,et al.  A generalized likelihood ratio approach to the detection and estimation of jumps in linear systems , 1976 .

[3]  A. Tartakovsky Multidecision Quickest Change-Point Detection: Previous Achievements and Open Problems , 2008 .

[4]  Michael Ludkovski,et al.  Bayesian Quickest Detection in Sensor Arrays , 2012 .

[5]  O. Hadjiliadis,et al.  Robustness of the N-CUSUM stopping rule in a Wiener disorder problem , 2014, 1410.8765.

[6]  Igor V. Nikiforov,et al.  Two strategies in the problem of change detection and isolation , 1997, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[7]  Taposh Banerjee,et al.  Data-Efficient Quickest Change Detection in Sensor Networks , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[8]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  Online activity detection in a multiuser environment using the matrix CUSUM Algorithm , 2002, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  Howard S. Burkom,et al.  Statistical Challenges Facing Early Outbreak Detection in Biosurveillance , 2010, Technometrics.

[10]  Emmanuel Yashchin,et al.  Likelihood ratio methods for monitoring parameters of a nested random effect model , 1995 .

[11]  Emmanuel Yashchin,et al.  Change-point models in industrial applications , 1997 .

[12]  Y. Mei Efficient scalable schemes for monitoring a large number of data streams , 2010 .

[13]  G. Lorden PROCEDURES FOR REACTING TO A CHANGE IN DISTRIBUTION , 1971 .

[14]  Tze Leung Lai,et al.  Information Bounds and Quick Detection of Parameter Changes in Stochastic Systems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[15]  Hongjoong Kim,et al.  A novel approach to detection of intrusions in computer networks via adaptive sequential and batch-sequential change-point detection methods , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[16]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  One Shot Schemes for Decentralized Quickest Change Detection , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[17]  E. S. Page CONTINUOUS INSPECTION SCHEMES , 1954 .

[18]  Taposh Banerjee,et al.  Data-Efficient Quickest Outlying Sequence Detection in Sensor Networks , 2014, ArXiv.

[19]  Y. Mei Efficient scalable schemes for monitoring a large number of data streams , 2010 .

[20]  Rasul A. Khan Detecting changes in probabilities of a multi—component process , 1995 .

[21]  G. Moustakides Optimal stopping times for detecting changes in distributions , 1986 .

[22]  David Bock,et al.  A review and discussion of prospective statistical surveillance in public health , 2003 .

[23]  Rudolf B. Blazek,et al.  Detection of intrusions in information systems by sequential change-point methods , 2005 .

[24]  Igor V. Nikiforov,et al.  A generalized change detection problem , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[25]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  Quickest detection of a change process across a sensor array , 2008, 2008 11th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[26]  Yajun Mei,et al.  An Adaptive Sampling Strategy for Online High-Dimensional Process Monitoring , 2015, Technometrics.

[27]  David Siegmund,et al.  Sequential multi-sensor change-point detection , 2013, 2013 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA).

[28]  C'eline L'evy-Leduc,et al.  Detection and localization of change-points in high-dimensional network traffic data , 2009, 0908.2310.

[29]  M. Basseville,et al.  Sequential Analysis: Hypothesis Testing and Changepoint Detection , 2014 .

[30]  D. Siegmund,et al.  Using the Generalized Likelihood Ratio Statistic for Sequential Detection of a Change-Point , 1995 .

[31]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  Quickest Change Detection of a Markov Process Across a Sensor Array , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[32]  M. Woodroofe Nonlinear Renewal Theory in Sequential Analysis , 1987 .

[33]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  Quickest Line Outage Detection and Identification , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[34]  Emmanuel Yashchin Regenerative Likelihood Ratio Control Schemes , 2015 .