Three-Dimensional, Extended Field-of-View Ultrasound Method for Estimating Large Strain Mechanical Properties of the Cervix during Pregnancy

Cervical shortening and cervical insufficiency contribute to a significant number of preterm births. However, the deformation mechanisms that control how the cervix changes its shape from long and closed to short and dilated are not clear. Investigation of the biomechanical problem is limited by (1) lack of thorough characterization of the three-dimensional anatomical changes associated with cervical deformation and (2) difficulty measuring cervical tissue properties in vivo. The objective of the present study was to explore the feasibility of using three-dimensional ultrasound and fundal pressure to obtain anatomically-accurate numerical models of large-strain cervical deformation during pregnancy and enable noninvasive assessment of cervical-tissue compliance. Healthy subjects (n = 6) and one subject with acute cervical insufficiency in the midtrimester were studied. Extended field-of-view ultrasound images were obtained of the entire uterus and cervix. These images aided construction of anatomically accurate numerical models. Cervical loading was achieved with fundal pressure, which was quantified with a vaginal pressure catheter. In one subject, the anatomical response to fundal pressure was matched by a model-based simulation of the deformation response, thereby deriving the corresponding cervical mechanical properties and showing the feasibility of noninvasive assessment of compliance. The results of this pilot study demonstrate the feasibility of a biomechanical modeling framework for estimating cervical mechanical properties in vivo. An improved understanding of cervical biomechanical function will clarify the pathophysiology of cervical shortening.

[1]  B. Sibai,et al.  Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. , 2001, JAMA.

[2]  S. Calvin Care for women with prior preterm birth. , 2011, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  M. Helms,et al.  Are vaginal and rectal pressures equivalent approximations of one another for the purpose of performing subtracted cystometry , 1995 .

[4]  Zlatnik Fj,et al.  Interval evaluation of the cervix for predicting pregnancy outcome and diagnosing cervical incompetence. , 1993, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[5]  R. Walker,et al.  Management of cervical weakness based on the measurement of cervical resistance index. , 2007, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[6]  Meredith Akins,et al.  Cervical remodeling during pregnancy and parturition , 2010, Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism.

[7]  S. Socrate,et al.  The cervix as a biomechanical structure , 2006, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[8]  S. Socrate,et al.  Mechanical and biochemical properties of human cervical tissue. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[9]  C. Spong,et al.  Prediction and prevention of recurrent spontaneous preterm birth. , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  A. Jaffa,et al.  Analysis of Cervical Dynamics by Ultrasound Imaging , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  M. Jabareen,et al.  Assessment of the in vivo biomechanical properties of the human uterine cervix in pregnancy using the aspiration test: a feasibility study. , 2009, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[12]  M. Hnat,et al.  Dynamics of cervical remodeling during pregnancy and parturition: mechanisms and current concepts. , 2007, Seminars in reproductive medicine.

[13]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery , 1998, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[14]  Todd E. Zickler,et al.  Constitutive modeling of porcine liver in indentation using 3D ultrasound imaging. , 2009, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[15]  Michael House,et al.  Relationships between mechanical properties and extracellular matrix constituents of the cervical stroma during pregnancy. , 2009, Seminars in perinatology.

[16]  Michael Bajka,et al.  Mechanical properties of the human uterine cervix: An in vivo study , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[17]  S. Socrate,et al.  How the Cervix Shortens , 2011, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[18]  Steve N Caritis,et al.  Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Michael House,et al.  A Method to Visualize 3‐Dimensional Anatomic Changes in the Cervix During Pregnancy , 2010, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[20]  Michael House,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of three-dimensional cervical anatomy in the second and third trimester. , 2009, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[21]  W. V. van Duyl,et al.  Stress relaxation of the human cervix: a new tool for diagnosis of cervical incompetence. , 1984, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[22]  Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Michael House,et al.  A study of the anisotropy and tension/compression behavior of human cervical tissue. , 2010, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[24]  J. Alison Noble,et al.  Ultrasound image segmentation: a survey , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  Timothy J Hall,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound Assessment of Cervical Microstructure , 2010, Ultrasonic imaging.

[26]  E. Thom,et al.  The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  I. Merkatz,et al.  Determination of the Elastic Properties of the Cervix , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  M. Oelze,et al.  Ultrasonic attenuation estimation of the pregnant cervix: a preliminary report , 2010, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.