Experimental Calibration of the Overlap Factor for the Pulsed Atmospheric Lidar by Employing a Collocated Scheimpflug Lidar

Lidar techniques have been widely employed for atmospheric remote sensing during past decades. However, an important drawback of the traditional atmospheric pulsed lidar technique is the large blind range, typically hundreds of meters, due to incomplete overlap between the transmitter and the receiver, etc. The large blind range prevents the successful retrieval of the near-ground aerosol profile, which is of great significance for both meteorological studies and environmental monitoring. In this work, we have demonstrated a new experimental approach to calibrate the overlap factor of the Mie-scattering pulsed lidar system by employing a collocated Scheimpflug lidar (SLidar) system. A calibration method of the overlap factor has been proposed and evaluated with lidar data measured in different ranges. The overlap factor, experimentally determined by the collocated SLidar system, has also been validated through horizontal comparison measurements. It has been found out that the median overlap factor evaluated by the proposed method agreed very well with the overlap factor obtained by the linear fitting approach with the assumption of homogeneous atmospheric conditions, and the discrepancy was generally less than 10%. Meanwhile, simultaneous measurements employing the SLidar system and the pulsed lidar system have been carried out to extend the measurement range of lidar techniques by gluing the lidar curves measured by the two systems. The profile of the aerosol extinction coefficient from the near surface at around 90 m up to 28 km can be well resolved in a slant measurement geometry during nighttime. This work has demonstrated a great potential of employing the SLidar technique for the calibration of the overlap factor and the extension of the measurement range for pulsed lidar techniques.

[1]  Andrea Malizia,et al.  Real-time vehicle emissions monitoring using a compact LiDAR system and conventional instruments: first results of an experimental campaign in a suburban area in southern Italy , 2016 .

[2]  Gail E. Bingham,et al.  Aglite lidar: a portable elastic lidar system for investigating aerosol and wind motions at or around agricultural production facilities , 2009 .

[3]  H. Kuze,et al.  Field-of-view dependence of lidar signals by use of Newtonian and Cassegrainian telescopes. , 1998, Applied optics.

[4]  Hui Li,et al.  Preliminary Studies on Atmospheric Monitoring by Employing a Portable Unmanned Mie-Scattering Scheimpflug Lidar System , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[5]  Sebastian Bronner,et al.  Boundary layer scattering measurements with a charge-coupled device camera lidar. , 2003, Applied optics.

[6]  Yoshinori Shoji,et al.  Automated compact mobile Raman lidar for water vapor measurement: instrument description and validation by comparison with radiosonde, GNSS, and high-resolution objective analysis , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[7]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  EARLINET: towards an advanced sustainable European aerosol lidar network , 2014 .

[8]  Christoph Ritter,et al.  Water Vapor Calibration: Using a Raman Lidar and Radiosoundings to Obtain Highly Resolved Water Vapor Profiles , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[9]  Liang Mei,et al.  Development of an atmospheric polarization Scheimpflug lidar system based on a time-division multiplexing scheme. , 2017, Optics letters.

[10]  Alexandros Papayannis,et al.  Inter-comparison of lidar and ceilometer retrievals for aerosol and Planetary Boundary Layer profiling over Athens, Greece , 2011 .

[11]  Yang Yang,et al.  Atmospheric extinction coefficient retrieval and validation for the single-band Mie-scattering Scheimpflug lidar technique. , 2017, Optics express.

[12]  张朝阳 Zhang Zhaoyang,et al.  Retrieval and analysis of aerosol lidar ratio at several typical regions in China , 2013 .

[13]  Wei Gong,et al.  OFLID: Simple method of overlap factor calculation with laser intensity distribution for biaxial lidar , 2011 .

[14]  K. Sassen,et al.  Lidar crossover function and misalignment effects. , 1982, Applied optics.

[15]  Shunxing Hu,et al.  Geometrical form factor determination with Raman backscattering signals. , 2005, Optics letters.

[16]  Konrad Ebisch,et al.  A correction to the Douglas-Peucker line generalization algorithm , 2002 .

[17]  Sune Svanberg,et al.  Super Resolution Laser Radar with Blinking Atmospheric Particles - Application to Interacting Flying Insects , 2014 .

[18]  Y Sasano,et al.  Geometrical form factor in the laser radar equation: an experimental determination. , 1979, Applied optics.

[19]  Alexander Haefele,et al.  An empirical method to correct for temperature-dependent variations in theoverlap function of CHM15k ceilometers , 2016 .

[20]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Macrophysical and optical properties of mid-latitude cirrus clouds over a semi-arid area observed by micro-pulse lidar , 2013 .

[21]  Sandip Pal,et al.  Monitoring Depth of Shallow Atmospheric Boundary Layer to Complement LiDAR Measurements Affected by Partial Overlap , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[22]  M. Kavaya,et al.  Lidar telescope overlap function and effects of misalignment for unstable resonator transmitter and coherent receiver. , 1986, Applied optics.

[23]  Daniele Bortoli,et al.  Infrared lidar overlap function: an experimental determination. , 2010, Optics express.

[24]  Kevin B. Strawbridge,et al.  Developing a portable, autonomous aerosol backscatter lidar for network or remote operations , 2012 .

[25]  Liping Liu,et al.  Comparing and Merging Observation Data from Ka-Band Cloud Radar, C-Band Frequency-Modulated Continuous Wave Radar and Ceilometer Systems , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[26]  Francesc Rocadenbosch,et al.  Aerosol Lidar Intercomparison in the Framework of SPALINET—The Spanish Lidar Network: Methodology and Results , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[27]  Tadeusz Stacewicz,et al.  Analytical function for lidar geometrical compression form-factor calculations. , 2005, Applied optics.

[28]  Hui Li,et al.  Noise modeling, evaluation and reduction for the atmospheric lidar technique employing an image sensor , 2018, Optics Communications.

[29]  R. Engelmann,et al.  An overview of the first decade of Polly NET : an emerging network of automated Raman-polarization lidars for continuous aerosol profiling , 2016 .

[30]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  Aerosol lidar intercomparison in the framework of the EARLINET project. 1. Instruments. , 2004 .

[31]  Nobuo Sugimoto,et al.  The Asian Dust and Aerosol Lidar Observation Network (AD-NET): Strategy and Progress , 2016 .

[32]  Dong Liu,et al.  Measurements of aerosol phase function and vertical backscattering coefficient using a charge-coupled device side-scatter lidar. , 2014, Optics express.

[33]  H van den Bergh,et al.  Influence of the photomultiplier tube spatial uniformity on lidar signals. , 1999, Applied optics.

[34]  A. Ansmann,et al.  Aerosol lidar intercomparison in the framework of the EARLINET project. 2. Aerosol backscatter algorithms. , 2004, Applied optics.

[35]  A. Ansmann,et al.  Experimental determination of the lidar overlap profile with Raman lidar. , 2002, Applied optics.

[36]  H. Kong,et al.  Experimental determination of a geometric form factor in a lidar equation for an inhomogeneous atmosphere. , 1997, Applied optics.

[37]  Sune Svanberg,et al.  Particle profiling and classification by a dual-band continuous-wave lidar system. , 2018, Applied optics.

[38]  Mikkel Brydegaard,et al.  Continuous‐wave differential absorption lidar , 2015 .

[39]  Dong Liu,et al.  New experimental method for lidar overlap factor using a CCD side-scatter technique. , 2015, Optics letters.

[40]  Chunsheng Zhao,et al.  Dual CCD detection method to retrieve aerosol extinction coefficient profile. , 2019, Optics express.

[41]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  EARLINET instrument intercomparison campaigns: overview on strategy and results , 2015 .

[42]  David Rees,et al.  Estimation of a lidar's overlap function and its calibration by nonlinear regression. , 2012, Applied optics.

[43]  J. Langerholc,et al.  Geometrical form factors for the lidar function. , 1978, Applied optics.

[44]  Alexandros Papayannis,et al.  The EOLE Project: A multiwavelength laser remote sensing (lidar) system for ozone and aerosol measurements in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere. Part II: Aerosol measurements over Athens, Greece , 2002 .

[45]  Jeremy Coupland,et al.  Determination of overlap in lidar systems. , 2011, Applied optics.

[46]  Detlef Müller,et al.  Multi-wavelength Raman lidar, sun photometric and aircraft measurements in combination with inversion models for the estimation of the aerosol optical and physico-chemical properties over Athens, Greece , 2012 .

[47]  Jian Li,et al.  Geometrical constraint experimental determination of Raman lidar overlap profile. , 2016, Applied optics.

[48]  Tatsuo Shiina.  LED Mini Lidar for Atmospheric Application , 2019, Sensors.

[49]  Mariana Adam,et al.  FROM OPERATIONAL CEILOMETER NETWORK TO OPERATIONAL LIDAR NETWORK , 2016 .

[50]  Ulla Wandinger,et al.  Target categorization of aerosol and clouds by continuous multiwavelength-polarization lidar measurements , 2017 .

[51]  Viktor A. Banakh,et al.  Lidar Studies of Wind Turbulence in the Stable Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[52]  X Li,et al.  Range-resolved bistatic imaging lidar for the measurement of the lower atmosphere. , 1996, Optics letters.

[53]  Mikkel Brydegaard,et al.  Atmospheric aerosol monitoring by an elastic Scheimpflug lidar system. , 2015, Optics express.

[54]  Wei Gong,et al.  Geometrical form factor calculation using Monte Carlo integration for lidar , 2012 .

[55]  F. G. Fernald.  Analysis of atmospheric lidar observations: some comments. , 1984, Applied optics.

[56]  Gary A. Morris,et al.  Comparison of aerosol lidar retrieval methods for boundary layer height detection using ceilometer aerosol backscatter data , 2016 .

[57]  Ihor Berezhnyy,et al.  A combined diffraction and geometrical optics approach for lidar overlap function computation , 2009 .

[58]  Jens Fiedler,et al.  Winds and temperatures of the Arctic middle atmosphere during January measured by Doppler lidar , 2017 .