Preference for fixed-interval schedules: an alternative model.

Pigeons were trained under concurrent chain schedules in which the initial links were equal aperiodic schedules and the terminal links were fixed-interval schedules. Choice proportions in the initial links were measured in 26 experimental conditions. The data showed the inadequacy of previous models of concurrent chain performance. A new model was suggested in which choice is a joint function of terminal-link times, overall reinforcement rates, and terminal-link entries. This model accounted for 94% of the variance in the present data and for substantial percentages of the variance in previously reported data. The model simplifies to matching between response ratios and obtained reinforcement rate ratios for simple concurrent schedule performance.

[1]  P. Killeen On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  N Squires,et al.  A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  W M Baum,et al.  Choice as time allocation. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  E. Fantino Choice and rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  D Macewen,et al.  The effects of terminal-link fixed-interval and variable-interval schedules on responding under concurrent chained schedules. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  M. Davison Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules: number of component intervals. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  M. Davison Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  H Rachlin,et al.  On the tautology of the matching law. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  CHOICE FOR PERIODIC SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT1 , 1970 .

[10]  R. Herrnstein SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  R. Herrnstein On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  P Killeen,et al.  The matching law. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  P. Killeen Preference for fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.