Comparative LCA of concrete with natural and recycled coarse aggregate in the New York City area

PurposeThe purpose of the present study is to compare the environmental impacts of using coarse natural aggregate (NA) and coarse recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) to produce concrete in the New York City area, by means of a unique LCA framework that incorporates comprehensive regional data.MethodsA comparative environmental impact assessment study was performed on the critical processes of the life cycles of NA and RCA concretes. For this purpose, concrete ready-mix plants, construction and demolition waste (CDW) recycling plants, NA quarries, and other producers and distributers of concrete raw materials, in addition to CDW landfills in the New York City area, were located. NA and RCA concrete mix proportions that result in the same compressive strength of concrete were used. Also, the environmental impact that would be caused if CDW was landfilled rather than processed into RCA was measured.Results and discussionIn the New York City area, replacing NA with RCA as a concrete aggregate does not affect the environmental impact of concrete production significantly. However, if CDW is recycled only for the purpose of producing concrete aggregate, the avoided landfilling of the CDW will be a result of producing RCA concrete. When avoided landfilling is accounted for, the magnitude of some of the environmental impact indicators for RCA concrete is significantly lower than those of NA concrete (16 and 17% for acidification and smog formation, respectively). In addition, it was found that the impact from transporting RCA to ready-mix plants is on average 37% less than that caused by transporting NA to the plants. Sensitivity analyses and normalization of the results revealed that the environmental impact of changing the type of concrete aggregate from NA to RCA is negligible compared to the total environmental burden of New York City.ConclusionsIf RCA concrete is used for all types of construction projects in the NYC area, achieving a significant reduction in the environmental impacts is unlikely. Future work is needed to study specific projects in the region that are categorized based on demand for transportation and cement (the largest environmental stressors of concrete production) to determine for which type of project the use of RCA concrete has the highest environmental benefits.

[1]  Jorge de Brito,et al.  Recycled Aggregate in Concrete: Use of Industrial, Construction and Demolition Waste , 2012 .

[2]  G. Norris.  Impact Characterization in the Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts , 2002 .

[3]  S Nagataki,et al.  Recycling of Demolished Concrete , 2001, "SP-200: Fifth CANMET/ACI Conference on Recent Advances in Concrete Technology-Proceeding, Fifth International Conference".

[4]  B. González-Fonteboa,et al.  Effect of recycled coarse aggregate on damage of recycled concrete , 2011 .

[5]  S. Nagataki,et al.  Assessment of recycling process induced damage sensitivity of recycled concrete aggregates , 2004 .

[6]  Tao Ding,et al.  A closed-loop life cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete utilization in China. , 2016, Waste management.

[7]  E. Sanyé-Mengual,et al.  Comparative LCA of recycled and conventional concrete for structural applications , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[8]  José Dinis Silvestre,et al.  Environmental impacts and benefits of the end-of-life of building materials – calculation rules, results and contribution to a “cradle to cradle” life cycle , 2014 .

[9]  S Marinković,et al.  Comparative environmental assessment of natural and recycled aggregate concrete. , 2010, Waste management.

[10]  Jane C. Bare,et al.  Updated US and Canadian normalization factors for TRACI 2.1 , 2014, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[11]  Yahya C. Kurama,et al.  Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Recycled Concrete Coarse Aggregates , 2015 .

[12]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  The ecoinvent database system: a comprehensive web-based LCA database , 2005 .

[13]  Jane C. Bare,et al.  TRACI 2.0: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0 , 2011 .

[14]  S. Thomas Ng,et al.  Substituting local data for overseas life cycle inventories – a case study of concrete products in Hong Kong , 2015 .

[15]  Benoit Fournier,et al.  Flexural Performance of Steel-Reinforced Recycled Concrete Beams , 2009 .

[16]  Robert H. Bier,et al.  LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN , 2007 .

[17]  C.-S. Poon,et al.  Mechanical properties of 5-year-old concrete prepared with recycled aggregates obtained from three different sources , 2008 .

[18]  J. de Brito,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of coarse natural and recycled aggregates for concrete , 2018 .

[19]  Qiang Du,et al.  Concrete with recycled concrete aggregate and crushed clay bricks , 2011 .

[20]  Antoni Cladera,et al.  Influence of the amount of mixed recycled aggregates on the properties of concrete for non-structural use , 2012 .

[21]  Miren Etxeberria,et al.  Recycled aggregate concrete as structural material , 2007 .

[22]  I. Topcu,et al.  Properties of concretes produced with waste concrete aggregate , 2004 .