Implementing a comprehensive translational oncology platform: from molecular testing to actionability

BackgroundIn order to establish the workflows required to implement a real-time process involving multi-omic analysis of patient samples to support precision-guided therapeutic intervention, a tissue acquisition and analysis trial was implemented. This report describes our findings to date, including the frequency with which mutational testing led to precision-guided therapy and outcome for those patients.MethodsEligible patients presenting to Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute were enrolled on the study. Patients with biopsy proven metastatic or locally advanced unresectable prostate cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia receiving standard of care therapy were eligible. Metastatic site biopsies were collected and analyzed using the Knight Diagnostic Lab GeneTrails comprehensive solid tumor panel (124 genes). CLIA certified genomic information was made available to the treating physician.ResultsBetween 1/26/2017 and 5/30/2018, 38 patients were enrolled, with 28 successfully undergoing biopsy. Of these, 25 samples yielded sufficient tumor for analysis. The median biopsy cellularity and number of cores collected were 70% (15–90%) and 5 (2–20), respectively. No procedure-related complications occurred. GeneTrails analysis revealed that 22 of 25 (88%) tumor samples harbored at least one potentially actionable mutation, and 18 (72%) samples harbored 2 or more potentially actionable mutations. The most common genetic alterations identified involved: DNA damage repair genes, cell cycle regulating genes, PIK3CA/Akt/mTOR pathway, and FGF gene family. To date, CLIA certified genomic results were used by treating physicians for precision-guided therapy in 5 (23%) patients.ConclusionWe report the feasibility of real-time tissue acquisition and analysis to support a successful translational oncology platform. The workflow will provide the foundation to improve access and accrual to biomarker driven precision oncology trials.

[1]  Nicolas Servant,et al.  Molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling versus conventional therapy for advanced cancer (SHIVA): a multicentre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[2]  J Jack Lee,et al.  Impact of Precision Medicine in Diverse Cancers: A Meta-Analysis of Phase II Clinical Trials. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  M. Robson,et al.  Olaparib for Metastatic Germline BRCA-Mutated Breast Cancer. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Vinay Prasad,et al.  Perspective: The precision-oncology illusion , 2016, Nature.

[5]  Gary W Procop,et al.  Prospective Clinical Study of Precision Oncology in Solid Tumors. , 2015, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  Stephen Moore,et al.  Assessing copy number alterations in targeted, amplicon-based next-generation sequencing data. , 2015, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[7]  Ignace Vergote,et al.  Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumors , 2012, Nature.

[9]  R. Kurzrock,et al.  Debunking the Delusion That Precision Oncology Is an Illusion. , 2017, The oncologist.

[10]  Funda Meric-Bernstam,et al.  Feasibility of Large-Scale Genomic Testing to Facilitate Enrollment Onto Genomically Matched Clinical Trials. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  The Molecular Taxonomy of Primary Prostate Cancer , 2015, Cell.

[12]  Val Gebski,et al.  Olaparib tablets as maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and a BRCA1/2 mutation (SOLO2/ENGOT-Ov21): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[13]  Wenyan Lu,et al.  Suppression of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling inhibits prostate cancer cell proliferation. , 2009, European journal of pharmacology.

[14]  E. Small,et al.  CT-Guided Bone Biopsies in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Factors Predictive of Maximum Tumor Yield. , 2017, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[15]  Francisco Cervantes,et al.  Long‐Term Outcomes of Imatinib Treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Integrated Genomic Characterization of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. , 2017, Cancer cell.

[17]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2013 .

[18]  Michael Thomas,et al.  Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  W. Foulkes,et al.  Olaparib for Metastatic Germline BRCA-Mutated Breast Cancer. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  W. Foulkes,et al.  Olaparib for Metastatic Germline BRCA-Mutated Breast Cancer. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  I. Tannock,et al.  Limits to Personalized Cancer Medicine. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Aleix Prat Aparicio Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2012 .

[23]  E. Felip,et al.  Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[24]  Rafal Dziadziuszko,et al.  Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK‐Positive Non–Small‐Cell Lung Cancer , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  K. Flaherty,et al.  Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.