Effect of ventricular contraction, pressure, and wall stretch on vessels at different locations in the wall.

A cylindrical model of the heart was used to calculate the influence of ventricular filling and (isovolumic and isobaric) contraction on the cross-sectional area and resistance of a subendocardial and subepicardial maximally dilated arteriole and venule. Contraction is defined as the difference between static diastole and static systole. Furthermore, a small piece of rectangular myocardium containing the vessel was modeled to distinguish between the individual contributions of contractility (i.e., myocardial elastic properties), ventricular pressure, and local circumferential stretch to the changes in vascular area and resistance during contraction. Calculations were performed assuming the muscle fibers ran in either an apex-to-base or a circumferential direction. The results were similar for the two directions. Assuming constant, physiological arteriolar and venular pressures of 45 and 10 mmHg, respectively, coronary blood vessels were predicted not to collapse during ventricular contraction. Moreover, vascular area reduction was found to be larger for the arteriole (approximately 50%) than for the venule (approximately 30%) during both isovolumic and isobaric contractions. Consequently, arteriolar resistance was found to increase more than venular resistance (approximately 340 and 120%, respectively). Subendocardial area reductions were found to be somewhat smaller than subepicardial area reductions for the venule (by approximately 10%) but not for the arteriole. Contractility was found to be the main contributor to the changes in vascular area and resistance in the subepicardium but to contribute by < 50% to the changes in the subendocardium. Because pressure does, but stretch does not, contribute to the area change during isovolumic contraction and the reverse is true during isobaric contraction, it was concluded that although changes in vascular area and resistance may be similar for different contractions, the causes for these changes are very different.

[1]  R. Judd,et al.  Effects of barium-induced cardiac contraction on large- and small-vessel intramyocardial blood volume. , 1991, Circulation research.

[2]  J I Hoffman,et al.  Cardiac contraction affects deep myocardial vessels predominantly. , 1991, The American journal of physiology.

[3]  R S Reneman,et al.  Porous medium finite element model of the beating left ventricle. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  F W Prinzen,et al.  Regional fibre stress : fibre strain area as an estimate of regional blood flow and oxygen demand in the canine heart , 2005 .

[5]  W. Chilian,et al.  Microvascular pressures and resistances in the left ventricular subepicardium and subendocardium. , 1991, Circulation research.

[6]  R Krams,et al.  Varying elastance concept may explain coronary systolic flow impediment. , 1989, The American journal of physiology.

[7]  J. Ross,et al.  Fiber Orientation in the Canine Left Ventricle during Diastole and Systole , 1969, Circulation research.

[8]  N. Westerhof,et al.  Vasomotor tone affects diastolic coronary flow and flow impediment by cardiac contraction similarly. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[9]  M. Marcus,et al.  Morphometry of Canine Coronary Arteries, Arterioles, and Capillaries during Hypertension and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy , 1986, Circulation research.

[10]  N. Westerhof,et al.  Effect of perfusion pressure on force of contraction in thin papillary muscles and trabeculae from rat heart. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  J D Humphrey,et al.  Transverse Stiffness: A Method for Estimation of Myocardial Wall Stress , 1987, Circulation research.

[12]  B. Brenner,et al.  Characterization of radial force and radial stiffness in Ca(2+)‐activated skinned fibres of the rabbit psoas muscle. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  J D Laird,et al.  Diastolic‐Systolic Coronary Flow Differences are Caused by Intramyocardial Pump Action in the Anesthetized Dog , 1981, Circulation research.

[14]  R W Gore,et al.  Vascular anatomy and hydrostatic pressure profile in the hamster cheek pouch. , 1986, The American journal of physiology.

[15]  M.G.J. Arts,et al.  A mathematical model of the dynamics of the left ventricle and the coronary circulation , 1978 .

[16]  J. Rhodin,et al.  Ultrastructure of mammalian venous capillaries, venules, and small collecting veins. , 1968, Journal of ultrastructure research.

[17]  Harold D. Green,et al.  REGISTRATION AND INTERPRETATION OF NORMAL PHASIC INFLOW INTO A LEFT CORONARY ARTERY BY AN IMPROVED DIFFERENTIAL MANOMETRIC METHOD , 1940 .

[18]  E S Kirk,et al.  Inhibition of Coronary Blood Flow by a Vascular Waterfall Mechanism , 1975, Circulation research.

[19]  N. Westerhof,et al.  Modeling pressure-area relations of coronary blood vessels embedded in cardiac muscle in diastole and systole. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[20]  J. Humphrey,et al.  Determination of a constitutive relation for passive myocardium: II. Parameter estimation. , 1990, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  F. Abel,et al.  Intramyocardial pressure gradients in working and nonworking isolated cat hearts. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[22]  F. Yin,et al.  Coronary artery resistance changes depend on how surrounding myocardial tissue is stretched. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[23]  J D Humphrey,et al.  Biaxial mechanical properties of passive and tetanized canine diaphragm. , 1993, The American journal of physiology.

[24]  A. McCulloch,et al.  Measurement of strain and analysis of stress in resting rat left ventricular myocardium. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  J A Spaan,et al.  Retrograde coronary flow is limited by time-varying elastance. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.