Analyzing Stimulus-frequency Otoacoustic Emission Fine Structure Using an Additive Model*

A good understanding of the origin of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission (SFOAE) fine structure in human ears and its probe level-dependency has potential clinical significance. In this study, we develop a two-component additive model, with total SFOAE unmixed into short- and long-latency components (or reflections) using time windowing method, to investigate the origin of SFOAE fine structure in humans from 40 to 70 dB SPL. The two-component additive model predicts that a spectral notch seen in the amplitude fine structure is produced when short- and long-latency components have opposite phases and comparable magnitudes. And the depth of spectral notch is significantly correlated with the amplitude difference between the two separated components, as well as their degree of opposite phase. Our independent evidence for components contributing to SFOAE fine structure suggests that amplitude, phase and delay fine structure in the human SFOAEs are a construct of the complex addition of two or more internal reflections with different phase slops in the cochlea.

[1]  Basilar-membrane interference patterns from multiple internal reflection of cochlear traveling waves. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  James B. Dewey,et al.  Efferent Modulation of Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emission Fine Structure , 2015, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[3]  G. Zweig,et al.  The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Dawn Konrad-Martin,et al.  Transient-evoked stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired ears. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Christopher A. Shera,et al.  The origin of SFOAE microstructure in the guinea pig , 2003, Hearing Research.

[6]  J. Guinan,et al.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  James B. Dewey,et al.  A common microstructure in behavioral hearing thresholds and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  G. Zweig,et al.  Noninvasive measurement of the cochlear traveling-wave ratio. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  D. T. Kemp,et al.  Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions , 1980, Hearing Research.

[11]  Testing coherent reflection in chinchilla: Auditory-nerve responses predict stimulus-frequency emissions. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  A. Gummer,et al.  Input-output functions of the nonlinear-distortion component of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal and hearing-impaired human earsa) , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Qin Gong,et al.  An objective assessment method for frequency selectivity of the human auditory system , 2014, Biomedical engineering online.

[14]  G. Long,et al.  Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  D. Kemp,et al.  Suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.