Social influence in a virtual tunnel fire--influence of conflicting information on evacuation behavior.

Evacuation from a smoke filled tunnel requires quick decision-making and swift action from the tunnel occupants. Technical installations such as emergency signage aim to guide tunnel occupants to the closest emergency exits. However, conflicting information may come from the behavior of other tunnel occupants. We examined if and how conflicting social information may affect evacuation in terms of delayed and/or inadequate evacuation decisions and behaviors. To this end, forty participants were repeatedly situated in a virtual reality smoke filled tunnel with an emergency exit visible to one side of the participants. Four social influence conditions were realized. In the control condition participants were alone in the tunnel, while in the other three experimental conditions a virtual agent (VA) was present. In the no-conflict condition, the VA moved to the emergency exit. In the active conflict condition, the VA moved in the opposite direction of the emergency exit. In the passive conflict condition, the VA stayed passive. Participants were less likely to move to the emergency exit in the conflict conditions compared to the no-conflict condition. Pre-movement and movement times in the passive conflict condition were significantly delayed compared to all other conditions. Participants moved the longest distances in the passive conflict condition. These results support the hypothesis that social influence affects evacuation behavior, especially passive behavior of others can thwart an evacuation to safety.

[1]  Jonathan D. Sime.  Crowd facilities, management and communications in disasters , 1999 .

[2]  Atle William Heskestad.  Performance in smoke of wayguidance systems , 1999 .

[3]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  The Social Dimension of Stress Reactivity , 2012, Psychological science.

[4]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  Evacuation models of the future: Insights from an online survey on user’s experiences and needs , 2011 .

[5]  Daniel Nilsson,et al.  Fire Evacuation in Underground Transportation Systems: A Review of Accidents and Empirical Research , 2013 .

[6]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Using driving simulators to assess driving safety. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Arnold Dix,et al.  Human behaviour during an evacuation scenario in the Sydney Harbour Tunnel , 2013 .

[8]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  Movement speed and exit choice in smoke-filled rail tunnels , 2013 .

[9]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  The evaluation of different evacuation models for assessing road tunnel safety analysis , 2012 .

[10]  F. H. Amundsen.  STUDIES OF DRIVER BEHAVIOUR IN NORWEGIAN ROAD TUNNELS , 1994 .

[11]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Virtual reality for the psychophysiological assessment of phobic fear: responses during virtual tunnel driving. , 2007, Psychological assessment.

[12]  F. H. Amundsen,et al.  Studies on traffic accidents in Norwegian road tunnels , 2000 .

[13]  Rosaldo J. F. Rossetti,et al.  Using serious games to train evacuation behaviour , 2012, 7th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI 2012).

[14]  D. A Purser,et al.  Quantification of behaviour for engineering design standards and escape time calculations , 2001 .

[15]  Daniel Nilsson,et al.  Evacuation experiment in a road tunnel: A study of human behaviour and technical installations , 2009 .

[16]  Erica D. Kuligowski,et al.  Overall and local movement speeds during fire drill evacuations in buildings up to 31 stories , 2012 .

[17]  Francisco Rebelo,et al.  Behavioral compliance for dynamic versus static signs in an immersive virtual environment. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  Bauke de Vries,et al.  Way finding during fire evacuation; an analysis of unannounced fire drills in a hotel at night , 2010 .

[19]  J. D Sime,et al.  An occupant response shelter escape time (ORSET) model , 2001 .

[20]  Erica D. Kuligowski.  General Guidance on Emergency Communication Strategies for Buildings , 2013 .

[21]  Francisco Rebelo,et al.  The influence of environmental features on route selection in an emergency situation. , 2013, Applied ergonomics.

[22]  Mathias Müller,et al.  Human behaviour in severe tunnel accidents: Effects of information and behavioural training , 2013 .

[23]  Chieh-Hsin Tang,et al.  Using virtual reality to determine how emergency signs facilitate way-finding. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[24]  Ira Helsloot,et al.  First International Conference on Evacuation Modelling and Management Exit choice, (pre-)movement time and (pre-)evacuation behaviour in hotel fire evacuation - Behavioural analysis and validation of the use of serious gaming in experimental research , 2010 .

[25]  Erica D. Kuligowski,et al.  Review of Building Evacuation Models , 2005 .

[26]  N. Raz,et al.  Turning bias in virtual spatial navigation: Age-related differences and neuroanatomical correlates , 2014, Biological Psychology.

[27]  C. Spielberger,et al.  Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory , 1970 .

[28]  Michel Egger.  Recommended Behaviour for Road Tunnel Users , 2005 .

[29]  Jose L. Torero,et al.  SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering , 2016 .

[30]  J. Sime.  Movement toward the Familiar , 1985 .

[31]  Sandrine Caroly,et al.  Road-tunnel fires: risk perception and management strategies among users. , 2009 .

[32]  Thomas W. Schubert.  The sense of presence in virtual environments , 2003 .

[33]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[34]  Bob Edwards,et al.  Gender and Evacuation: A Closer Look at Why Women are More Likely to Evacuate for Hurricanes , 2002 .

[35]  Laura K. Siebeneck,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Variation in Evacuee Risk Perception Throughout the Evacuation and Return‐Entry Process , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[36]  Alessandro Calvi,et al.  How Long is Really a Road Tunnel? Application of Driving Simulator for the Evaluation of the Effects of Highway Tunnel on Driving Performance , 2011 .

[37]  B. Latané,et al.  Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Muhammad Jawad Hashim,et al.  Interpretation of way-finding healthcare symbols by a multicultural population: navigation signage design for global health. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[39]  Daniel Nilsson,et al.  Social influence during the initial phase of a fire evacuation—Analysis of evacuation experiments in a cinema theatre , 2009 .

[40]  Thomas Banton,et al.  The Perception of Walking Speed in a Virtual Environment , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[41]  Haukur Ingason.  Fire Dynamics in Tunnels , 2005 .

[42]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[43]  Enrico Ronchi,et al.  The impact of default settings on evacuation model results: a study of visibility conditions vs occupant walking speeds , 2011 .

[44]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[45]  Fran H. Norris,et al.  Predicting Evacuation in Two Major Disasters: Risk Perception, Social Influence, and Access to Resources , 1999 .

[46]  Glyn Lawson,et al.  Validating a low cost approach for predicting human responses to emergency situations. , 2013, Applied ergonomics.

[47]  Brenda K. Wiederhold,et al.  Virtual Reality Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Due to Motor Vehicle Accident , 2010, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..