Communications Research for Command & Control: Human-Machine Interface Technologies Supporting Effective Air Battle Management

Abstract : Battle management command and control (BMC2) is a communications intensive activity. Weapons directors and mission crew commanders on these platforms are required to monitor as many as eight simultaneous communications channels against a background of moderate to high ambient cabin noise while performing a number of visual and manual tasks, a combination which in the heat of battle is challenging even for the most highly trained operators. Researchers at the Air Force Research Laboratory's Human Effectiveness Directorate (AFRL/HE) have been investigating two technologies to ameliorate this problem: active noise reduction (ANR) headsets and spatial intercoms. ANR headsets cancel environmental noise while preserving speech signals presented via the communications network, while spatial intercoms enhance communications by increasing the effective signal-to-noise ratio of each individual communications channel, taking advantage of the listener's natural ability to efficiently segregate speech streams that are separated in space. This paper will describe investigations at AFRL/HE directed at the enhancement of speech intelligibility in multi-channel tactical BMC2 environments using ANR and spatial intercom technology. Results will be discussed from basic laboratory experimentation, simulated mission scenarios, and field evaluations, and interpreted in the context of the acquisition and integration of such technologies for current and future BMC2 weapons systems.

[1]  Mark A. Ericson,et al.  Factors That Influence Intelligibility in Multitalker Speech Displays , 2004 .

[2]  A D Musicant,et al.  The influence of pinnae-based spectral cues on sound localization. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  L. A. Jeffress,et al.  Localization of High‐Frequency Tones , 1957 .

[4]  Simon R. Oldfield,et al.  Acuity of Sound Localisation: A Topography of Auditory Space. I. Normal Hearing Conditions , 1984, Perception.

[5]  John Hall,et al.  E-3 In-Flight Acoustic Exposure Studies and Mitigation Via Active Noise Reduction Headset , 2002 .

[6]  D. Irvine Physiology of the Auditory Brainstem , 1992 .

[7]  Richard L. McKinley,et al.  Monitoring the Simultaneous Presentation of Spatialized Speech Signals in a Virtual Acoustic Environment , 1998 .

[8]  F L Wightman,et al.  Headphone simulation of free-field listening. I: Stimulus synthesis. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Michael W. Haas,et al.  Applying Adaptive Control and Display Characteristics to Future Air Force Crew Stations , 2001 .

[10]  R. Butler,et al.  Factors that influence the localization of sound in the vertical plane. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Douglas S Brungart,et al.  The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Robert S. Bolia,et al.  User-Centered Evaluation of Multi-National Communication and Collaborative Technologies in a Network-Centric Air Battle Management Environment , 2004 .

[13]  Robert S. Bolia,et al.  Asymmetric Performance in the Cocktail Party Effect: Implications for the Design of Spatial Audio Displays , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Robert S. Bolia The effect of monauralized binaural displays on speech intelligibility , 2002 .

[15]  Russell L. Martin,et al.  Free-Field Equivalent Localization of Virtual Audio , 2001 .

[16]  D. Halpern Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[17]  Pamela S. Tsang,et al.  The Roles of Immediacy and Redundancy Relative Subjective Workload Assessment , 1994 .

[18]  Robert Bolia,et al.  Spatial Audio Displays for Target Acquisition and Speech Communications , 2003 .

[19]  Brian D. Simpson,et al.  Optimizing the spatial configuration of a seven-talker speech display , 2005, TAP.

[20]  Michael A. Vidulich,et al.  Use of Workload Redlines: A KC-135 Crew-Reduction Application , 1994 .

[21]  M. Gardner,et al.  Problem of localization in the median plane: effect of pinnae cavity occlusion. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  A. Mills On the minimum audible angle , 1958 .

[23]  Robert S. Bolia Effects of Spatial Intercoms and Active Noise Reduction Headsets on Speech Intelligibility in an AWACS Environment , 2003 .

[24]  Simon R. Oldfield,et al.  Acuity of Sound Localisation: A Topography of Auditory Space. II. Pinna Cues Absent , 1984, Perception.