Network structure influence on simulated network interventions for behaviour change

Abstract We simulated diffusion of behaviour change over fifteen real-world networks with seven network interventions under both simple and complex contagion. We found that structural network properties affect both the diffusion outcome and the relative effectiveness of the different interventions, with confounding effects that were inconsistent with results expected from mathematical analysis. These results suggest that comprehensive studies are needed to identify the effects of structural properties on diffusion in real-world networks. Further, researchers attempting to identify the effect of individual properties must measure a range of properties to avoid incorrect attribution.

[1]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Network interventions on physical activity in an afterschool program: an agent-based social network study. , 2015, American journal of public health.

[2]  Jennifer M. Murray,et al.  Social network interventions for health behaviours and outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, PLoS medicine.

[3]  Jennifer Badham,et al.  Simulating network intervention strategies: Implications for adoption of behaviour , 2018, Network Science.

[4]  R. Lippitt,et al.  Leadership and Isolation. , 1943 .

[5]  Dean Eckles,et al.  Estimating peer effects in networks with peer encouragement designs , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Damon Centola,et al.  The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment , 2010, Science.

[7]  M. Macy,et al.  Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  Leo Katz,et al.  A new status index derived from sociometric analysis , 1953 .

[9]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[10]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Rahmatollah Beheshti,et al.  Comparing methods of targeting obesity interventions in populations: An agent-based simulation , 2017, SSM - population health.

[12]  Ross A Hammond,et al.  Precision Treatment and Precision Prevention: Integrating "Below and Above the Skin". , 2016, JAMA pediatrics.

[13]  Joshua L. Payne,et al.  Analysis of a threshold model of social contagion on degree-correlated networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Peter Sheridan Dodds,et al.  Information cascades on degree-correlated random networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[16]  M. Keeling,et al.  Networks and epidemic models , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[17]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Epidemic processes in complex networks , 2014, ArXiv.

[18]  Elihu Katz,et al.  Social Relations and Innovation in the Medical Profession: The Epidemiology of a New Drug , 1955 .

[19]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[20]  Jennifer M. Badham,et al.  Commentary: Measuring the shape of degree distributions , 2013, Network Science.

[21]  M. Newman.  Properties of highly clustered networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  W. O. Kermack,et al.  Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics—I , 1991, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[23]  Douglas Guilbeault,et al.  Complex Contagions: A Decade in Review , 2017, ArXiv.

[24]  L. Freeman,et al.  The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science , 2005 .

[25]  S. Feld.  Why Your Friends Have More Friends Than You Do , 1991, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  M. Klein,et al.  Identifying Influence Agents That Promote Physical Activity Through the Simulation of Social Network Interventions: Agent-Based Modeling Study , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[27]  Duncan J Watts,et al.  A simple model of global cascades on random networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  W. O. Kermack,et al.  A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics , 1927 .

[29]  A Sociometric Study of Influence in Southtown , 1947 .

[30]  F. Kee,et al.  Effectiveness variation in simulated school-based network interventions , 2019, Appl. Netw. Sci..

[31]  James P. Gleeson,et al.  Cascades on a class of clustered random networks , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  J. Coleman,et al.  The Diffusion of an Innovation Among Physicians , 1957 .

[33]  M. L. Levin,et al.  Traditions of Research on the Diffusion of Innovation , 1963 .

[34]  T. Valente.  Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations , 1996 .

[35]  George G. Vega Yon,et al.  Diffusion/Contagion Processes on Social Networks , 2020, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[36]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[37]  Takehisa Hasegawa,et al.  Cascade dynamics on clustered network , 2010 .

[38]  G. Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Agent-Based Models , 2007 .

[39]  N. Christakis,et al.  Social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change: a cluster randomised controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[40]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Engineering social contagions: Optimal network seeding in the presence of homophily , 2013, Network Science.

[41]  B. Ryan.  The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities , 1943 .

[42]  T. Valente.  Network Interventions , 2012, Science.

[43]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[44]  J. Moreno.  Who Shall Survive: A New Approach to the Problem of Human Interrelations , 2017 .