Dominance of capacities by k

In this paper we deal with the set of $k$-additive belieffunctions dominating a given capacity. We follow the lineintroduced by Chateauneuf and Jaffray for dominating probabilities and continued by Grabisch for general $k$-additive measures.First, we show that the conditions for the general $k$-additive case lead to a very wide class of functions and this makes that the properties obtained for probabilities are no longer valid. On the other hand, we show that these conditions cannot be improved.We solve this situation by imposing additional constraints on the dominating functions. Then, we consider the more restrictive case of $k$-additive belief functions. In this case, a similar result with stronger conditions is proved. Although better, this result is not completely satisfactory and, as before, the conditionscannot be strengthened. However, when the initial capacity is a belief function, we find a subfamily of the set of dominating $k$-additive belief functions from which it is possible to derive any other dominant $k$-additive belief function, and such that theconditions are even more restrictive, obtaining the natural extension of the result for probabilities. Finally, we apply these results in the fields of Social Welfare Theory and Decision Under Risk.

[1]  T. Fine,et al.  Towards a Frequentist Theory of Upper and Lower Probability , 1982 .

[2]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  On some results of the set of dominating $k$-additive belief functions , 2004 .

[3]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  Axiomatic structure of k-additive capacities , 2005, Math. Soc. Sci..

[4]  Steven Vajda,et al.  The Theory of Linear Economic Models , 1960 .

[5]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  Identification of non-additive measures from sample data , 2003, Planning Based on Decision Theory.

[6]  Michel GRABISCH,et al.  The Interaction and Möbius Representations of Fuzzy Measures on Finite Spaces, -Additive Measures: A Survey , 2022 .

[7]  Thibault Gajdos,et al.  Measuring Inequalities without Linearity in Envy: Choquet Integrals for Symmetric Capacities , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[8]  Michel Grabisch Upper Approximation of Non-additive Measures by k-additive Measures --- The Case of Belief Functions , 1999, ISIPTA.

[9]  T. Fine,et al.  Bayes-like Decision Making With Upper and Lower Probabilities , 1982 .

[10]  L. Shapley Cores of convex games , 1971 .

[11]  Jean-Luc Marichal,et al.  k-intolerant capacities and Choquet integrals , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  Optimization Issues for Fuzzy Measures , 1999, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[13]  Alain Chateauneuf,et al.  Some Characterizations of Lower Probabilities and Other Monotone Capacities through the use of Möbius Inversion , 1989, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[14]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  K-order Additive Discrete Fuzzy Measures and Their Representation , 1997, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[15]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  p-Symmetric Fuzzy Measures , 2002, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[16]  Didier Dubois,et al.  A class of fuzzy measures based on triangular norms , 1982 .

[17]  M. Sugeno,et al.  A MODEL OF LEARNING BASED ON FUZZY INFORMATION , 1977 .

[18]  G. Choquet Theory of capacities , 1954 .

[19]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  On Lower and Upper Approximation of Fuzzy Measures by k-Order Additive Measures , 2000 .

[20]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[21]  J. Jaffray,et al.  Decision making with belief functions: Compatibility and incompatibility with the sure-thing principle , 1993 .

[22]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  Characterizing k-additive fuzzy measures , 2002 .

[23]  菅野 道夫,et al.  Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications , 1975 .

[24]  G. Rota On the foundations of combinatorial theory I. Theory of Möbius Functions , 1964 .

[25]  I. Gilboa,et al.  Linear Measures, the Gini Index, and The Income-Equality Trade-off , 1994 .

[26]  Arthur P. Dempster,et al.  Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multivalued Mapping , 1967, Classic Works of the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Belief Functions.

[27]  Peter P. Wakker Dempster Belief Functions are Based on the Principle of Complete Ignorance , 2000, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..