Comparison of postural changes and muscle fatigue between two types of lumbar support: a prospective longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND Lumbar supports are used in the management of low back pain (LBP). Although various types of lumbar supports are available, insufficient evidence exists regarding their effectiveness. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two types of lumbar support on postural change and muscle fatigue in a prospective longitudinal study. METHODS A total of 144 subjects (9 men and 135 women) with LBP were enrolled in this study. Subjects were divided into 2 groups: a conventional lumbosacral support (LS) group and a wear-type support (SW) group. They filled in questionnaires that included the Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), and a questionnaire that evaluated the severity of LBP at baseline, 1, 2, and 3 months. The first 40 enrolled subjects were investigated for muscle fatigue and walking efficacy during a gait-loading test, and posture at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. RESULTS The intensity of LBP and the number of days with LBP significantly decreased over time in both groups. The decrease was similar in both groups at each time point. Wearing either support for 3 months did not induce erector spinae muscle fatigue. Furthermore, walking efficacy improved but spinal alignment was not affected by either support. Subjects in the SW group reported that the support was comfortable to wear for long periods, while subjects in the LS group mentioned that the LS relieved LBP by tightly supporting the lower back. CONCLUSION Both types of support reduced mild LBP and improved walking efficiency without causing muscle fatigue.

[1]  Kengo Yamamoto,et al.  Sagittal lumbar and pelvic alignment in the standing and sitting positions , 2012, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[2]  A. Jaiyesimi,et al.  Reliability of physiological cost index measurements. , 2007, African journal of medicine and medical sciences.

[3]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Spinal Range of Motion, Muscle Endurance, and Back Pain and Function at Least 20 Years After Fusion or Brace Treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Case-Control Study , 2006, Spine.

[4]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Back belt use for prevention of occupational low back pain: a systematic review. , 2005, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[5]  B. Koes,et al.  An update of a systematic review of controlled clinical trials on the primary prevention of back pain at the workplace. , 2004, Occupational medicine.

[6]  S. Linton,et al.  Preventive Interventions for Back and Neck Pain Problems: What is the Evidence? , 2001, Spine.

[7]  Malhar N. Kumar,et al.  Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion , 2001, European Spine Journal.

[8]  M. Roland,et al.  The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. , 2000, Spine.

[9]  D. Landsittel,et al.  A prospective study of back belts for prevention of back pain and injury. , 2000, JAMA.

[10]  M P de Looze,et al.  Mechanisms of Action of Lumbar Supports: A Systematic Review , 2000, Spine.

[11]  R. Cailliet,et al.  Elliptical modeling of the sagittal lumbar lordosis and segmental rotation angles as a method to discriminate between normal and low back pain subjects. , 1998, Journal of spinal disorders.

[12]  R. Jackson,et al.  Compensatory Spinopelvic Balance Over the Hip Axis and Better Reliability in Measuring Lordosis to the Pelvic Radius on Standing Lateral Radiographs of Adult Volunteers and Patients , 1998, Spine.

[13]  T. Dillingham.  Lumbar supports for prevention of low back pain in the workplace. , 1998, JAMA.

[14]  P. Korovessis,et al.  Reciprocal Angulation of Vertebral Bodies in the Sagittal Plane in an Asymptomatic Greek Population , 1998, Spine.

[15]  L M Bouter,et al.  A systematic review of controlled clinical trials on the prevention of back pain in industry. , 1997, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[16]  J. Larson.  The MOS 36-Item Short form Health Survey , 1997, Evaluation & the health professions.

[17]  R. Jackson,et al.  Radiographic Analysis of Sagittal Plane Alignment and Balance in Standing Volunteers and Patients with Low Back Pain Matched for Age, Sex, and Size: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Study , 1994, Spine.

[18]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. , 1994 .

[19]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[20]  T. Beeker,et al.  Toward Standards for Posture: Postural Characteristics of the Lower Back System in Normal and Pathologic Conditions , 1985, Spine.

[21]  M. Roland,et al.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain. , 1983, Spine.

[22]  A. Nachemson,et al.  IN VIVO MEASUREMENTS OF INTRADISCAL PRESSURE. DISCOMETRY, A METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PRESSURE IN THE LOWER LUMBAR DISCS. , 1964, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  M. Sekiguchi,et al.  Effects of long-term corset wearing on chronic low back pain. , 2012, Fukushima journal of medical science.

[24]  J. Hecquet,et al.  Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[25]  A. Schultz,et al.  Mechanical effectiveness studies of lumbar spine orthoses. , 1983, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine. Supplement.