Outcome after incomplete spinal cord injury: central cord versus Brown-Sequard syndrome

Study design:A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.Objective:A hemisection of the spinal cord is a frequently used animal model for spinal cord injury (SCI), the corresponding human condition, that is, the Brown-Sequard syndrome (BS), is relatively rare as compared with the central cord syndrome (CC). The time course of neurological deficit, functional recovery, impulse conductivity and rehabilitation length of stay in BS and CC subjects were compared.Setting:Nine European Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Centers.Methods:Motor score, walking function, daily life activities, somatosensory evoked potentials and length of stay were evaluated 1 and 6 months after SCI, and were compared between age-matched groups of tetraparetic BS and CC subjects.Results:For all analyzed measures no difference in the time course of improvement was found in 15 matched pairs.Conclusion:In contrast to the assumption of a better outcome of subjects with BS, no difference was found between the two incomplete SCI groups. This is of interest with respect to the different potential mechanisms leading to a recovery of functions in these two SCI subgroups.

[1]  M. Jefferson The Brown‐Séquard Syndrome , 1954, Medicine illustrated.

[2]  P. London Injury , 1969, Definitions.

[3]  V. L. Nickel,et al.  Incomplete traumatic quadriplegia. A ten-year review. , 1971, JAMA.

[4]  L. Mendell Modifiability of spinal synapses. , 1984, Physiological reviews.

[5]  E. Halar,et al.  Temporal course of motor recovery after Brown-Sequard spinal cord injuries , 1985, Paraplegia.

[6]  P. Koehler,et al.  The Brown-Séquard syndrome. True or false? , 1986, Archives of neurology.

[7]  E. Roth,et al.  Traumatic central cord syndrome: clinical features and functional outcomes. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  J. Ditunno,et al.  Age effect on prognosis for functional recovery in acute, traumatic central cord syndrome. , 1990, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  R. Young,et al.  The clinical diagnosis of disorders of the spinal cord. , 1991, Neurologic clinics.

[10]  E. Roth,et al.  Traumatic cervical Brown-Sequard and Brown-Sequard-plus syndromes: the spectrum of presentations and outcomes , 1991, Paraplegia.

[11]  P. Nathan,et al.  Effects on movement of surgical incisions into the human spinal cord. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  Diagnosis and Management of Disorders of the Spinal Cord , 1995 .

[13]  A. Tow,et al.  Central cord syndrome: functional outcome after rehabilitation , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[14]  Jeffrey M. Liebmann,et al.  a ten year review , 1998 .

[15]  V. Dietz,et al.  Prognosis and recovery in ischaemic and traumatic spinal cord injury: clinical and electrophysiological evaluation , 1999, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[16]  Brown-Séquard and his syndrome , 2000, The Lancet.

[17]  H Barbeau,et al.  Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI): an international multicenter validity and reliability study , 2000, Spinal Cord.

[18]  R. Fraser,et al.  The long-term outcome after central cord syndrome: a study of the natural history. , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[19]  D. Wolfe,et al.  Classifying incomplete spinal cord injury syndromes: algorithms based on the International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Patients. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  H Ring,et al.  The Catz-Itzkovich SCIM: a revised version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure. , 2001, Disability and rehabilitation.

[21]  Martin E. Schwab,et al.  Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  J. Mcdonald,et al.  Spinal-cord injury , 2002, The Lancet.

[23]  W. Donovan,et al.  International Standards For Neurological Classification Of Spinal Cord Injury , 2003, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[24]  V. Dietz,et al.  Providing the clinical basis for new interventional therapies: refined diagnosis and assessment of recovery after spinal cord injury , 2004, Spinal Cord.

[25]  C. Fisher,et al.  Factors Predicting Motor Recovery and Functional Outcome After Traumatic Central Cord Syndrome: A Long-term Follow-up , 2005, Spine.

[26]  A. Sharan,et al.  Central cord injury: pathophysiology, management, and outcomes. , 2006, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[27]  J. Bloch,et al.  Nogo-A–specific antibody treatment enhances sprouting and functional recovery after cervical lesion in adult primates , 2006, Nature Medicine.

[28]  L. Werhagen,et al.  Neurological and functional outcome in traumatic central cord syndrome , 2007, Spinal Cord.

[29]  Michelle Meade,et al.  Incidence and Outcomes of Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Syndromes , 2007, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[30]  V. Dietz,et al.  Standardized assessment of walking capacity after spinal cord injury: the European network approach , 2008, Neurological research.

[31]  A. Davis,et al.  Motor and sensory assessment of patients in clinical trials for pharmacological therapy of acute spinal cord injury: psychometric properties of the ASIA Standards. , 2008, Journal of neurotrauma.

[32]  Volker Dietz,et al.  Recovery from a spinal cord injury: significance of compensation, neural plasticity, and repair. , 2008, Journal of neurotrauma.