Markov propagation of allosteric effects in biomolecular systems: application to GroEL–GroES
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Solomon Kullback,et al. Information Theory and Statistics , 1960 .
[2] J. Changeux,et al. Allosteric proteins and cellular control systems. , 1963, Journal of molecular biology.
[3] J. Changeux,et al. ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.
[4] D. Koshland,et al. Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. , 1966, Biochemistry.
[5] P. Flory,et al. Statistical thermodynamics of random networks , 1976, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.
[6] Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al. Mixture models : inference and applications to clustering , 1989 .
[7] Lila M. Gierasch,et al. Characterization of a functionally important mobile domain of GroES , 1993, Nature.
[8] Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonln GroEL at 2.8 Å , 1994, Nature.
[9] F. Hartl,et al. Role of the chaperonin cofactor Hsp10 in protein folding and sorting in yeast mitochondria , 1994, The Journal of cell biology.
[10] I. Bahar,et al. Effect of Molecular Structure on Local Chain Dynamics: Analytical Approaches and Computational Methods , 1994 .
[11] Y. Kashi,et al. Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release , 1994, Nature.
[12] A. Horovitz,et al. Residue lysine-34 in GroES modulates allosteric transitions in GroEL. , 1994, Biochemistry.
[13] A. Horovitz,et al. Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. , 1995, Biochemistry.
[14] A. Horovitz,et al. Inter-ring communication is disrupted in the GroEL mutant Arg13 --> Gly; Ala126 --> Val with known crystal structure. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[15] A. Horovitz,et al. Structural basis of allosteric changes in the GroEL mutant Arg197→Ala , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.
[16] A. Horwich,et al. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex , 1997, Nature.
[17] A. Horovitz,et al. Detection of changes in pairwise interactions during allosteric transitions: coupling between local and global conformational changes in GroEL. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[18] I. Bahar,et al. Gaussian Dynamics of Folded Proteins , 1997 .
[19] A. Atilgan,et al. Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. , 1997, Folding & design.
[20] Amnon Horovitz,et al. Mapping the Transition State of the Allosteric Pathway of GroEL by Protein Engineering , 1998 .
[21] K. Hinsen. Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations , 1998, Proteins.
[22] A. Horwich,et al. Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.
[23] M Karplus,et al. The allosteric mechanism of the chaperonin GroEL: a dynamic analysis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[24] C. Georgopoulos,et al. Genetic analysis of the bacteriophage T4-encoded cochaperonin Gp31. , 1999, Genetics.
[25] G Vriend,et al. Conformational changes in the chaperonin GroEL: new insights into the allosteric mechanism. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.
[26] C. Georgopoulos,et al. Compensatory Changes in GroEL/Gp31 Affinity as a Mechanism for Allele-specific Genetic Interaction* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[27] R. Ranganathan,et al. Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. , 1999, Science.
[28] T. N. Bhat,et al. The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..
[29] M Karplus,et al. A Dynamic Model for the Allosteric Mechanism of GroEL , 2000 .
[30] Ivet Bahar,et al. Dynamics of proteins predicted by molecular dynamics simulations and analytical approaches: Application to α‐amylase inhibitor , 2000, Proteins.
[31] C. Georgopoulos,et al. The Importance of a Mobile Loop in Regulating Chaperonin/ Co-chaperonin Interaction , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[32] R. Jernigan,et al. Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. , 2001, Biophysical journal.
[33] F. Shewmaker,et al. The Disordered Mobile Loop of GroES Folds into a Defined β-Hairpin upon Binding GroEL* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[34] A. Horovitz,et al. φ value analysis of heterogeneity in pathways of allosteric transitions: Evidence for parallel pathways of ATP-induced conformational changes in a GroEL ring , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[35] Neil A Ranson,et al. The chaperonin folding machine. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[36] A. Horovitz,et al. Mapping pathways of allosteric communication in GroEL by analysis of correlated mutations , 2002, Proteins.
[37] R L Jernigan,et al. Molecular mechanisms of chaperonin GroEL-GroES function. , 2002, Biochemistry.
[38] Dror Tobi,et al. Allosteric changes in protein structure computed by a simple mechanical model: hemoglobin T<-->R2 transition. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[39] D. Thirumalai,et al. Annealing function of GroEL: structural and bioinformatic analysis. , 2002, Biophysical chemistry.
[40] Gürol M. Süel,et al. Evolutionarily conserved networks of residues mediate allosteric communication in proteins , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.
[41] A. Horovitz,et al. Conversion of the allosteric transition of GroEL from concerted to sequential by the single mutation Asp-155 → Ala , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[42] C. Georgopoulos,et al. A mobile loop order–disorder transition modulates the speed of chaperonin cycling , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[43] Allan D. Jepson,et al. Hierarchical Eigensolver for Transition Matrices in Spectral Methods , 2004, NIPS.
[44] Robert B Best,et al. A mutant chaperonin with rearranged inter-ring electrostatic contacts and temperature-sensitive dissociation , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[45] Ann B. Lee,et al. Geometric diffusions as a tool for harmonic analysis and structure definition of data: diffusion maps. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[46] J. Changeux,et al. Allosteric Mechanisms of Signal Transduction , 2005, Science.
[47] I. Bahar,et al. Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[48] I. Bahar,et al. Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.
[49] Jianpeng Ma,et al. Usefulness and limitations of normal mode analysis in modeling dynamics of biomolecular complexes. , 2005, Structure.
[50] Ivet Bahar,et al. Elastic network models for understanding biomolecular machinery: from enzymes to supramolecular assemblies , 2005, Physical biology.
[51] I. Bahar,et al. Coupling between catalytic site and collective dynamics: a requirement for mechanochemical activity of enzymes. , 2005, Structure.
[52] B. Nadler,et al. Diffusion maps, spectral clustering and reaction coordinates of dynamical systems , 2005, math/0503445.
[53] M. Wall,et al. Quantifying allosteric effects in proteins , 2005, Proteins.
[54] Amnon Horovitz,et al. Allosteric regulation of chaperonins. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.
[55] Gideon Schreiber,et al. Folding and binding: an extended family business , 2005 .
[56] Chakra Chennubhotla,et al. Markov Methods for Hierarchical Coarse-Graining of Large Protein Dynamics , 2006, RECOMB.