Deriving metrics of driving comfort for autonomous vehicles: A dynamic latent variable model of speed choice

Abstract While the interest of the transport research community and automotive industry is increasingly turning towards developments and improvements in the field of autonomous vehicles, there is a need for a better understanding of the end users’ preferences regarding perceived passenger comfort, in order to improve acceptance and intention to use. The present study is based on a driving simulator experiment conducted at the University of Leeds Driving Simulator and approaches the issue of comfort via observed speed choice behaviour. Participants drove a series of driving simulator scenarios composed of road segments of different road type, road geometry, risk level at the road edge, and oncoming traffic. They also completed a series of self-report questionnaires, including Arnett’s Inventory of Sensation-seeking. A set of models was developed in order to investigate the effects of road environment and sensation-seeking on speed behaviour. The initial model only considered explanatory variables related to the road environment and accounted for individual unobserved heterogeneity. Past behaviour, serial correlation and heterogeneity in road environment were then introduced in the model specification. The autoregressive disturbance term that accounted for serial correlation was also applied in the form of a random variable and significantly improved model fit. Finally, sensation-seeking was incorporated in the model as a latent variable. The results showed a significant impact of most of the road elements as road type, curvature, risk type at the road edge on observed behaviour, implying a future need for the development of autonomous vehicle controllers that adapt their performance based on the road environment. Moreover, sensation-seeking had a significant and positive effect on speed, which indicates a potential future demand for personalised controllers to meet the users’ individual preferences.

[1]  France Mentré,et al.  A comparison of bootstrap approaches for estimating uncertainty of parameters in linear mixed‐effects models , 2013, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[2]  Lalita Thakali,et al.  Benchmarking regions using a heteroskedastic grouped random parameters model with heterogeneity in mean and variance: Applications to grade crossing safety analysis , 2018, Analytic Methods in Accident Research.

[3]  Mazen Danaf,et al.  Modeling anger and aggressive driving behavior in a dynamic choice-latent variable model. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Hybrid Choice Models: Progress and Challenges , 2002 .

[5]  D. Freedman,et al.  On The So-Called “Huber Sandwich Estimator” and “Robust Standard Errors” , 2006 .

[6]  Peter A. Rogerson,et al.  Identifying elderly travel time disparities using a correlated grouped random parameters hazard-based duration approach , 2019, Research in Transportation Business & Management.

[7]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[8]  A. Zuur,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2009 .

[9]  S. Hess,et al.  Heterogeneous preferences toward landscape externalities of wind turbines – combining choices and attitudes in a hybrid model , 2015 .

[10]  Shlomo Bekhor,et al.  A passing gap acceptance model for two-lane rural highways , 2009 .

[11]  S. Seabury,et al.  Estimating the Accident Risk of Older Drivers , 2007 .

[12]  Francesco Bella,et al.  Driver perception of roadside configurations on two-lane rural roads: Effects on speed and lateral placement. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Unobserved heterogeneity and the statistical analysis of highway accident data , 2016 .

[14]  Cole D Fitzpatrick,et al.  The influence of clear zone size and roadside vegetation on driver behavior. , 2014, Journal of safety research.

[15]  Denis Bolduc,et al.  On estimation of Hybrid Choice Models , 2009 .

[16]  Wei Zhang,et al.  The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[17]  Nikhil Menon,et al.  A statistical analysis of consumer perceptions towards automated vehicles and their intended adoption , 2020 .

[18]  Mats Wiklund,et al.  Effect of surrounding landscape on driving behaviour: A driving simulator study , 2009 .

[19]  Türker Özkan,et al.  Multidimensional Traffic Locus of Control Scale (T-LOC): factor structure and relationship to risky driving , 2005 .

[20]  Nima Golshani,et al.  Grouped random parameters bivariate probit analysis of perceived and observed aggressive driving behavior: A driving simulation study , 2017 .

[21]  J. Halton On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals , 1960 .

[22]  Andrew Daly,et al.  Calculating Errors for Measures Derived from Choice Modeling Estimates , 2012 .

[23]  Milan Simic,et al.  In the Passenger Seat: Investigating Ride Comfort Measures in Autonomous Cars , 2015, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine.

[24]  Panagiotis Ch. Anastasopoulos,et al.  A random thresholds random parameters hierarchical ordered probit analysis of highway accident injury-severities , 2017 .

[25]  Alan Blatt,et al.  Analysis of stationary and dynamic factors affecting highway accident occurrence: A dynamic correlated grouped random parameters binary logit approach. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  J. Arnett Sensation seeking: A new conceptualization and a new scale , 1994 .

[27]  S. Hess,et al.  Analysis of mode choice for intercity travel: Application of a hybrid choice model to two distinct US corridors , 2018, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[28]  K. Train Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[29]  Akshay Vij,et al.  Hybrid Choice Models: The Identification Problem , 2014 .

[30]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Modelling decisions of control transitions and target speed regulations in full-range Adaptive Cruise Control based on Risk Allostasis Theory , 2018, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[31]  A. Daly,et al.  Using ordered attitudinal indicators in a latent variable choice model: a study of the impact of security on rail travel behaviour , 2012 .

[32]  Panagiotis Ch. Anastasopoulos,et al.  An exploratory investigation of public perceptions towards key benefits and concerns from the future use of flying cars , 2020 .

[33]  Tomer Toledo,et al.  State Dependence in Lane-Changing Models , 2009 .

[34]  Alessandro Calvi Does Roadside Vegetation Affect Driving Performance?: Driving Simulator Study on the Effects of Trees on Drivers' Speed and Lateral Position , 2015 .

[35]  S. Washington,et al.  Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis , 2010 .

[36]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  How, when and why integrated choice and latent variable models are latently useful , 2016 .

[37]  J. Cramer Econometric Applications of Maximum Likelihood Methods , 1986 .

[38]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Mental Workload, Longitudinal Driving Behavior, and Adequacy of Car-Following Models for Incidents in Other Driving Lane , 2010 .

[39]  P. Konstantinou,et al.  Investment decisions in manufacturing: Assessing the effects of real oil prices and their uncertainty , 2013 .

[40]  Fertility and Female Employment Dynamics in Europe: The Effect of Using Alternative Econometric Modeling Assumptions , 2011 .

[41]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  The effect of speed limits on drivers' choice of speed: A random parameters seemingly unrelated equations approach , 2016 .

[42]  Josef F. Krems,et al.  Driving comfort, enjoyment and acceptance of automated driving – effects of drivers’ age and driving style familiarity , 2018, Ergonomics.

[43]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[44]  Sarvani Sonduru Pantangi,et al.  The effects of driver fatigue, gender, and distracted driving on perceived and observed aggressive driving behavior: A correlated grouped random parameters bivariate probit approach , 2019, Analytic Methods in Accident Research.

[45]  Natasha Merat,et al.  What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully Automated Road Transport Systems in shared space? , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[46]  S. Hess,et al.  Understanding the formation and influence of attitudes in patients' treatment choices for lower back pain: testing the benefits of a hybrid choice model approach. , 2014, Social science & medicine.

[47]  Panagiotis Ch. Anastasopoulos,et al.  A preliminary investigation of the effectiveness of high visibility enforcement programs using naturalistic driving study data: A grouped random parameters approach , 2019, Analytic Methods in Accident Research.

[48]  Liyun Zhang,et al.  Importing Exporters and Exporting Importers: A Study of the Decision of Chinese Firms to Engage in International Trade , 2018, Review of International Economics.

[49]  David Palma,et al.  Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application , 2019, Journal of Choice Modelling.

[50]  Mark Vollrath,et al.  The effects of road, driver, and passenger presence on drivers’ choice of speed: a driving simulator study , 2017 .

[51]  Richard van der Horst,et al.  Influence of Roadside Infrastructure on Driving Behavior: Driving Simulator Study , 2007 .

[52]  Haris N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  Integrated driving behavior modeling , 2007 .

[53]  Nikiforos Stamatiadis,et al.  Evaluation of Highway Design Parameters on Influencing Operator Speeds through Casewise Visual Evaluation , 2010 .

[54]  Danilo Alves de Lima,et al.  Autonomous vehicles: scientometric and bibliometric review* , 2018, Transport Reviews.

[55]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  Alternative Ordered Response Frameworks for Examining Pedestrian Injury Severity in New York City , 2014 .

[56]  A. Pradhan,et al.  Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: A simulated driving study. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[57]  Clevo Wilson,et al.  Will people accept shared autonomous electric vehicles? A survey before and after receipt of the costs and benefits , 2019, Economic Analysis and Policy.

[58]  Josef F. Krems,et al.  Objective Metrics of Comfort: Developing a Driving Style for Highly Automated Vehicles , 2016 .

[59]  Matthias Rauterberg,et al.  The Exploration of Autonomous Vehicle Driving Styles: Preferred Longitudinal, Lateral, and Vertical Accelerations , 2016, AutomotiveUI.

[60]  Josef F. Krems,et al.  Comfort in automated driving: An analysis of preferences for different automated driving styles and their dependence on personality traits , 2018 .

[61]  Ricardo A. Daziano,et al.  Are Consumers Willing to Pay to Let Cars Drive for Them? Analyzing Response to Autonomous Vehicles , 2017 .

[62]  Asaf Degani,et al.  An Approach for Measurement of Passenger Comfort: Real-Time Classification based on In-Cabin and Exterior Data , 2018, 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[63]  Yanyong Guo,et al.  Exploring unobserved heterogeneity in bicyclists' red-light running behaviors at different crossing facilities. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[64]  Danping Liu,et al.  Assessing Risk-Taking in a Driving Simulator Study: Modeling Longitudinal Semi-Continuous Driving Data Using a Two-Part Regression Model with Correlated Random Effects. , 2015, Analytic methods in accident research.

[65]  David Shinar,et al.  Effect of shoulder width, guardrail and roadway geometry on driver perception and behavior. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[66]  Iyad Rahwan,et al.  The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles , 2015, Science.

[67]  Andrew Daly,et al.  Contrasting imputation with a latent variable approach to dealing with missing income in choice models , 2014 .

[68]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  The Initial Conditions Problem in Dynamic, Nonlinear Panel Data Models with Unobserved Heterogeneity , 2002 .

[69]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  A temporal analysis of driver-injury severities in crashes involving aggressive and non-aggressive driving , 2020 .

[70]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Extended Framework for Modeling Choice Behavior , 1999 .