Optimal EPI parameters for reduction of susceptibility-induced BOLD sensitivity losses: A whole-brain analysis at 3 T and 1.5 T

Most functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies record the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal using fast gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (GE EPI). However, GE EPI can suffer from substantial signal dropout caused by inhomogeneities in the static magnetic field. These field inhomogeneities occur near air/tissue interfaces, because they are generated by variations in magnetic susceptibilities. Thus, fMRI studies are often limited by a reduced BOLD sensitivity (BS) in inferior brain regions. Recently, a method has been developed which allows for optimizing the BS in dropout regions by specifically adjusting the slice tilt, the direction of the phase-encoding (PE), and the z-shim moment. However, optimal imaging parameters were only reported for the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and inferior temporal lobes. The present study determines the optimal slice tilt, PE direction, and z-shim moment at 3 T and 1.5 T, otherwise using standard fMRI acquisition parameters. Results are reported for all brain regions, yielding a whole-brain atlas of optimal parameters. At both field strengths, optimal parameters increase the BS by more than 60% in many voxels in the OFC and by at least 30% in the other dropout regions. BS gains are shown to be more widespread at 3 T, suggesting an increased benefit from the dropout compensation at higher fields. Even the mean BS of a large brain region, e.g., encompassing the medial OFC, can be increased by more than 15%. The maps of optimal parameters allow for assessing the feasibility and improving fMRI of brain regions affected by susceptibility-induced BS losses.

[1]  Seung-Schik Yoo,et al.  Selection of voxel size and slice orientation for fMRI in the presence of susceptibility field gradients: application to imaging of the amygdala , 2003, NeuroImage.

[2]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[3]  R Turner,et al.  Optimized EPI for fMRI studies of the orbitofrontal cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional MRI , 1997 .

[5]  Yong Man Ro,et al.  Reduction of susceptibility artifact in gradient‐echo imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Lukas Scheef,et al.  Functional 3.0-T MR assessment of higher cognitive function: are there advantages over 1.5-T imaging? , 2005, Radiology.

[7]  Robert Turner,et al.  Trajectory measurement and generalised reconstruction in rectilinear EPI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modelling Geometric Deformations in Epi Time Series , 2022 .

[9]  G. Glover,et al.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Comparison of oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  R. Turner,et al.  Combined correction for geometric distortion and its interaction with head movement in fMRI , 2002 .

[11]  Gary H Glover,et al.  Mitigation of susceptibility‐induced signal loss in neuroimaging using localized shim coils , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Jens Frahm,et al.  COMMENTS AND CONTROVERSIES Functional MRI of the Human Amygdala , 2001 .

[13]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[14]  R. A. Knight,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF RELATIVE BRAIN IRON CONCENTRATIONS USING T-2-WEIGHTED AND T-2(ASTERISK)-WEIGHTED MRI AT 3-TESLA , 1994 .

[15]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[16]  J A Sorenson,et al.  Compensation of susceptibility-induced signal loss in echo-planar imaging for functional applications. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[17]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[19]  R Turner,et al.  Optimisation of the 3D MDEFT sequence for anatomical brain imaging: technical implications at 1.5 and 3 T , 2004, NeuroImage.

[20]  Lawrence L. Wald,et al.  Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters , 2005, NeuroImage.

[21]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Susceptibility-Induced Loss of Signal: Comparing PET and fMRI on a Semantic Task , 2000, NeuroImage.

[22]  N. Logothetis,et al.  MR imaging in the non-human primate: studies of function and of dynamic connectivity , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[23]  P. Jezzard,et al.  Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  V A Stenger,et al.  Three‐dimensional tailored RF pulses for the reduction of susceptibility artifacts in T*2‐weighted functional MRI , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  Douglas C Noll,et al.  Dynamic field map estimation using a spiral‐in/spiral‐out acquisition , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[27]  S Robinson,et al.  Optimized 3 T EPI of the amygdalae , 2004, NeuroImage.

[28]  J. Finsterbusch,et al.  Reducing inhomogeneity artifacts in functional MRI of human brain activation-thin sections vs gradient compensation. , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[29]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[30]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Event-related fMRI , 1997 .

[31]  Robert Turner,et al.  Image Distortion Correction in fMRI: A Quantitative Evaluation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[32]  Christian Schwarzbauer,et al.  Positive or negative blips? The effect of phase encoding scheme on susceptibility-induced signal losses in EPI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[33]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Single-shot compensation of image distortions and BOLD contrast optimization using multi-echo EPI for real-time fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[34]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Correction of EPI Nyquist ghosting caused by the non-uniform frequency response of the MRI receiver chain , 2006 .

[35]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Compensation of Susceptibility-Induced BOLD Sensitivity Losses in Echo-Planar fMRI Imaging , 2001, NeuroImage.

[36]  M. Raichle,et al.  Anatomic Localization and Quantitative Analysis of Gradient Refocused Echo-Planar fMRI Susceptibility Artifacts , 1997, NeuroImage.

[37]  Robert J. Ogg,et al.  Effects of EPI readout bandwidth on measured activation map and BOLD response in fMRI experiments , 2005, NeuroImage.

[38]  M Zaitsev,et al.  Point spread function mapping with parallel imaging techniques and high acceleration factors: Fast, robust, and flexible method for echo‐planar imaging distortion correction , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[39]  J. Frahm,et al.  Direct FLASH MR imaging of magnetic field inhomogeneities by gradient compensation , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[40]  K. Amunts,et al.  Cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human amygdala, hippocampal region and entorhinal cortex: intersubject variability and probability maps , 2005, Anatomy and Embryology.