Data driven quantification of the temporal scope of building LCAs

Abstract In the construction sector, LCAs typically apply an approach based on fixed or partially fixed building lifespans/service lives/reference study period. The temporal scopes applied in building LCAs are hence typically not reflecting that the timeframes buildings can provide the service they are intended to provide, are (highly) dependent on numerous factors e.g.: building location, materials used to construct the building, energy supply and the use of the building. Inaccurate estimation of the temporal scope of a building LCA will lead to incorrect quantification of the environmental impacts of buildings. Incorrect quantification of the environmental performance of buildings may, in the worst case, derange/decelerate the development within the building sector towards more sustainable buildings. In this paper, a data set consisting of 20999 Danish buildings, demolished between 2009 and 2015, is analyzed. A multiple linear regression model is derived and used to quantify the temporal scope (often referred to as the reference study period) of building LCAs in an attempt to improve the accuracy of sustainability assessment of buildings, taking several influencing factors into account. The results obtained from the derived model are subsequently compared with several fixed/partially fixed building lifespan/service life/reference study period quantification approaches The regression model proved to estimate the lifespan with lower errors (compared to observed values) than the prevailing approach relying on a single fixed value for all building locations, uses and building materials. The application of model based site, use, and/or material specific etc. temporal scope quantification in LCA is new and provides a mean to reduce the uncertainty of LCA results; however, the approach needs to be formalized.

[1]  D W Pennington,et al.  Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications , 2004 .

[2]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review , 2014 .

[3]  Hasan Selim,et al.  Determinants of house prices in Turkey: Hedonic regression versus artificial neural network , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Service life of the dwelling stock in Spain , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[5]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  Relevance of simplifications in LCA of building components , 2009 .

[6]  Melissa M. Bilec,et al.  Impact of lifetime on US residential building LCA results , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[7]  W. Erwin Diewert,et al.  Hedonic Regressions and the Decomposition of a House Price Index into Land and Structure Components , 2015 .

[8]  Carlos Rodríguez,et al.  Life cycle assessment of residential buildings: a review of methodologies , 2015 .

[9]  Johan Braet,et al.  Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review , 2013 .

[10]  A. Horvath CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND THE ENVIRONMENT , 2004 .

[11]  English Version,et al.  Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of environmental performance of buildings - Calculation method , 2010 .

[12]  Gillian Frances Menzies,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: A Review , 2009 .

[13]  Michel Kornmann,et al.  Service life of the building stock of Switzerland , 2012 .

[14]  Stephen Gibbons,et al.  The Amenity Value of English Nature: A Hedonic Price Approach , 2014 .

[15]  Varun,et al.  Life cycle assessment of buildings: A review , 2011 .

[16]  Laura O. Taylor The Hedonic Method , 2003 .

[17]  Erik Brandt,et al.  Levetider af bygningsdele ved vurdering af bæredygtighed og totaløkonomi , 2013 .

[18]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[19]  Xiaoling Zhang,et al.  Factors influencing the service lifespan of buildings: An improved hedonic model , 2014 .

[20]  Henrikke Baumann,et al.  The hitch hiker's guide to LCA : an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application , 2004 .

[21]  T. Tasaki,et al.  Lifespan of Commodities, Part I , 2010 .

[22]  Margaret Jollands,et al.  Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost implication of residential buildings - A review , 2015 .

[23]  Oscar Ortiz,et al.  Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA , 2009 .

[24]  Ben Amor,et al.  Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review , 2017 .

[25]  Jukka Lahdensivu,et al.  Statistical and geographical study on demolished buildings , 2016 .

[26]  Robert Ries,et al.  Impact of building service life models on life cycle assessment , 2013 .

[27]  T. Hassard,et al.  Applied Linear Regression , 2005 .

[28]  Niklaus Kohler,et al.  Mortality analysis of an urban building stock , 2017 .

[29]  S. Rosen Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[30]  S. Weisberg Applied Linear Regression: Weisberg/Applied Linear Regression 3e , 2005 .