Thinking Style Diversity and Collaborative Design Learning

The paper explores the impact of structured learning experiences that were designed to challenge students’ ways of thinking and promote creativity. The aim was to develop the ability of students, coming from different engineering disciplines and characterized by particular thinking style profiles, to collaboratively work on a project-based learning experience in an educational environment. Three project-based learning experiences were structured using critical thinking methods to stimulate creativity. Pre and post-survey data using a specially modified thinking style inventory for 202 design students indicated a thinking style profile of preferences with a focus on exploring and questioning. Statistically significant results showed students successfully developed empathy and openness to multiple perspectives.

[1]  L. Mamykina,et al.  Collaborative creativity , 2002, CACM.

[2]  R. Griffiths.  THE 24-HOUR PROJECT: FROM CONCEPT TO INTERACTIVE MODEL IN LESS THAN A DAY , 2004 .

[3]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2006 .

[4]  R. Sternberg,et al.  A Threefold Model of Intellectual Styles , 2005 .

[5]  Hamideh Afsarmanesh,et al.  Network-Centric Collaboration and Supporting Frameworks , 2006 .

[6]  Benson Rosen,et al.  Virtual team effectiveness: a proposed research agenda , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[7]  Anthony Davids,et al.  Ecological Psychology: Concepts and Methods for Studying the Environment of Human Behavior. , 1969 .

[8]  Ann F. McKenna,et al.  Characterizing Design Learning: A Mixed‐Methods Study of Engineering Designers' Use of Language , 2008 .

[9]  Francesco Sofo.  Differences of Degree or Differences in Kind? A Comparative Analysis of Thinking Styles , 2008 .

[10]  Poul Henrik Kyvsgaard Hansen,et al.  Engineering Curriculum Reform at Aalborg University , 1996 .

[11]  Richard J. Koubek,et al.  Distributed Collaborative Design Teams: Media Effects on Design Processes , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[13]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  The impact and instructional benefit of using multimedia case studies to teach engineering design , 1994 .

[14]  Maurizio Muzzupappa,et al.  Critical Thinking and Concept Design Generation in a Collaborative Network , 2008, Virtual Enterprises and Collaborative Networks.

[15]  Maurizio Muzzupappa,et al.  Identifying Partners And Organizational Logical Structures For Collaborative Conceptual Design , 2006, PRO-VE.

[16]  Luis M. Camarinha-Matos,et al.  Pervasive Collaborative Networks , 2008 .

[17]  Francesco Sofo,et al.  Thinking styles of modern Chinese leaders: Independence and exploration in an historically conditional China , 2005 .

[18]  Dorothy A. Leonard,et al.  When Sparks Fly: Harnessing the Power of Group Creativity , 2005 .

[19]  Li-Fang Zhang,et al.  Thinking Styles and Cognitive Development , 2002, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[20]  A. Agogino,et al.  Perceptions of the Design Process: An Examination of Gendered Aspects of New Product Development* , 2004 .

[21]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design(tm) Into Practice , 2003 .

[22]  G. Lynn,et al.  The Role of Personality in New Product Development Team Performance , 2002 .

[23]  Gary Torbit.  Counsellor Learner Style: A Variable in Career Choice , 1981 .

[24]  L. Ivanitskaya,et al.  Interdisciplinary Learning: Process and Outcomes , 2002 .

[25]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Mental Self-Government: A Theory of Intellectual Styles and Their Development , 1988 .

[26]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Perspectives on the Nature of Intellectual Styles , 2009 .