Predicting Survey Responses: How and Why Semantics Shape Survey Statistics on Organizational Behaviour

Some disciplines in the social sciences rely heavily on collecting survey responses to detect empirical relationships among variables. We explored whether these relationships were a priori predictable from the semantic properties of the survey items, using language processing algorithms which are now available as new research methods. Language processing algorithms were used to calculate the semantic similarity among all items in state-of-the-art surveys from Organisational Behaviour research. These surveys covered areas such as transformational leadership, work motivation and work outcomes. This information was used to explain and predict the response patterns from real subjects. Semantic algorithms explained 60–86% of the variance in the response patterns and allowed remarkably precise prediction of survey responses from humans, except in a personality test. Even the relationships between independent and their purported dependent variables were accurately predicted. This raises concern about the empirical nature of data collected through some surveys if results are already given a priori through the way subjects are being asked. Survey response patterns seem heavily determined by semantics. Language algorithms may suggest these prior to administering a survey. This study suggests that semantic algorithms are becoming new tools for the social sciences, opening perspectives on survey responses that prevalent psychometric theory cannot explain.

[1]  Wm. R. Wright General Intelligence, Objectively Determined and Measured. , 1905 .

[2]  In-Sue Oh,et al.  Transformational Leadership and Performance Across Criteria and Levels: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Research , 2011 .

[3]  Carlo Strapparava,et al.  Corpus-based and Knowledge-based Measures of Text Semantic Similarity , 2006, AAAI.

[4]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[5]  Achilles A. Armenakis,et al.  Leader–member social exchange (LMSX): development and validation of a scale , 2007 .

[6]  Paras Kaul Mind garden , 1997, SIGGRAPH '97.

[7]  George A. Miller,et al.  Using Corpus Statistics and WordNet Relations for Sense Identification , 1998, CL.

[8]  Ralph M. Stogdill,et al.  Manual for the leader behavior description questionnaire - Form XII , 1963 .

[9]  David Eichelberger,et al.  Handbook Of Psychological Testing , 2016 .

[10]  Preslav Nakov,et al.  Weight functions impact on LSA performance , 2001 .

[11]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Making sense of one’s actions in an explanatory vacuum: The interpretation of nonconscious goal striving , 2010 .

[12]  Ezequiel Morsella,et al.  Oxford Handbook of Human Action , 2009 .

[13]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[14]  Kathleen L. Slaney,et al.  Constructing an understanding of constructs , 2013 .

[15]  S. T. Dumais,et al.  Using latent semantic analysis to improve access to textual information , 1988, CHI '88.

[16]  Michael Healy,et al.  Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications , 2010 .

[17]  Kai R. Larsen,et al.  Exploring the Semantic Validity of Questionnaire Scales , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[18]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  The relative impact of complementary leader behaviors: Which matter most? , 2012 .

[19]  J. Smedslund Non-empirical and empirical components in the hypotheses of five social psychological experiments , 1994 .

[20]  B. Kuvaas Performance appraisal satisfaction and employee outcomes: mediating and moderating roles of work motivation , 2006 .

[21]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[22]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for English , 1995, HLT.

[23]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  Transformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead , 2002 .

[24]  C. Coombs A theory of data. , 1965, Psychology Review.

[25]  Richard C. W. Kao,et al.  On a connection between factor analysis and multidimensional unfolding , 1960 .

[26]  Rada Mihalcea,et al.  Text-to-Text Semantic Similarity for Automatic Short Answer Grading , 2009, EACL.

[27]  E. Olivier,et al.  COGNITION AND ACTION , 2014 .

[28]  Bård Kuvaas,et al.  Work performance, affective commitment, and work motivation: the roles of pay administration and pay level , 2006 .

[29]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Improving the retrieval of information from external sources , 1991 .

[30]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..

[32]  Lois E. Tetrick,et al.  Social and Economic Exchange: Construct Development and Validation. , 2006 .

[33]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. , 1993 .

[34]  N. Schwarz Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. , 1999 .

[35]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[36]  R. C. Durfee,et al.  MULTIPLE FACTOR ANALYSIS. , 1967 .

[37]  N. McGlynn Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[38]  Joel Michell,et al.  Measuring dimensions of belief by unidimensional unfolding , 1994 .

[39]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Measurement and Meaning in Information Systems and Organizational Research: Methodological and Philosophical Foundations , 2011, MIS Q..

[40]  Danqi Chen,et al.  of the Association for Computational Linguistics: , 2001 .

[41]  Patrick F. Reidy An Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis , 2009 .

[42]  J. M. Digman PERSONALITY STRUCTURE: EMERGENCE OF THE FIVE-FACTOR MODEL , 1990 .

[43]  Henk A. L. Kiers,et al.  Why Factor Analysis Often is the Incorrect Model for Analyzing Bipolar Concepts, and What Model to Use Instead , 1994 .

[44]  J. Smedslund,et al.  What is measured by a psychological measure , 1988 .

[45]  Jerry P. Miller,et al.  Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership , 1996 .

[46]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire , 2013 .

[47]  Joel Michell,et al.  Constructs, inferences, and mental measurement , 2013 .

[48]  R. J. House,et al.  The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis? , 1997 .

[49]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[50]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[51]  L. V. Dyne,et al.  Helping and Voice Extra-Role Behaviors: Evidence of Construct and Predictive Validity , 1998 .

[52]  S. Sitkin,et al.  A Critical Assessment of Charismatic—Transformational Leadership Research: Back to the Drawing Board? , 2013 .

[53]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[54]  Kai R. Larsen,et al.  9. A Mathematical Approach to Categorization and Labeling of Qualitative Data: The Latent Categorization Method , 2004 .

[55]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Transformational and Transactional Leadership Correlates of Effectiveness and Satisfaction: An Update and Extension , 2013 .