Geoelectric Studies of Seasonal Wetting and Drying of a Texas Vertisol

Vertisols are complex soils with high clay content (>30%), high shrink–swell potential, and microrelief features known as gilgai . We applied field and laboratory electrical-resistivity measurements to characterize seasonal wetting and drying of a Texas Vertisol, and to quantify the effects of gilgai and cracks on seasonal hydrodynamics of the soil. Thirty-two multielectrode resistivity-profiling lines were collected along the same profile from 1 May 2005 to 22 Apr. 2006, using combined dipole–dipole and Schlumberger electrode configurations. The profiles were 17.5 m long and intersected two sets of microlows and microhighs of the gilgai. The resistivity data were inverted using the RES2DINV program and the inverted data were corrected for temperature. We measured variations of resistivity with soil moisture in the laboratory and the results were used to calibrate the field data. To evaluate the resistivity results, in situ measurements of soil moisture were made using auger sampling. During the wetting cycle, three distinct soil moisture regimes were recognized in the upper 1.4 m of the Vertisol: an upper zone (0–0.5-m depth), which is the most dynamic with regard to wetting and drying; a middle zone (0.5–1.1 m), which is relatively saturated and less dynamic; and a lower zone (below 1.1 m), which is relatively less saturated compared with the middle layer. The saturation of the middle layer appears to be enhanced by preferential flow through cracks. Also, the microrelief topography exercises a control on spatiotemporal variations in soil moisture in that the microhighs dry faster than the microlows.

[1]  L. Wilding,et al.  Vertisols: their distribution, properties, classification and management. , 1988 .

[2]  Allen L. Newman Vertisols in Texas — Some Comments , 1983 .

[3]  Joe T. Ritchie,et al.  Soil shrinkage relationships of Texas vertisols: I. Small cores. , 1980 .

[4]  Kevin J. McInnes,et al.  Low tension water flow in structured soils , 1997 .

[5]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Soil water evaluation using a hydrologic model and calibrated sensor network , 2000 .

[6]  A. E. Bussian Electrical conductance in a porous medium , 1983 .

[7]  G. Keller,et al.  The Geoelectrical Methods in Geophysical Exploration , 1994 .

[8]  D. H. Griffiths,et al.  Two-dimensional resistivity imaging and modelling in areas of complex geology , 1993 .

[9]  G. Campbell,et al.  An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics , 1977 .

[10]  B. Nicoullaud,et al.  Spatial and temporal monitoring of soil water content with an irrigated corn crop cover using surface electrical resistivity tomography , 2003 .

[11]  P. Houser,et al.  Evaluation of the OhmMapper Instrument for Soil Moisture Measurement , 2002 .

[12]  George V. Keller,et al.  Electrical Methods in Geophysical Prospecting , 1981 .

[13]  J. Claerbout,et al.  Robust Modeling With Erratic Data , 1973 .

[14]  S. Constable,et al.  Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from magnetotelluric data , 1990 .

[15]  R. Frohlich,et al.  The Electrical Resistivity of the Vadose Zone — Field Survey , 1989 .

[16]  A. I. Olayinka,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Sewage Disposal Systems Using 2D Electrical-Resistivity Imaging and Geochemical Analysis: A Case Study from Ibadan, Southwestern Nigeria , 2006 .

[17]  Timo Saarenketo,et al.  Electrical properties of water in clay and silty soils , 1998 .

[18]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Field data and flow system response in clay (vertisol) shale terrain, north central Texas, USA , 2005 .

[19]  F. Nachtergaele Soil taxonomy—a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys: Second edition, by Soil Survey Staff, 1999, USDA–NRCS, Agriculture Handbook number 436, Hardbound , 2001 .

[20]  T. Yeh,et al.  An Integrative Approach for Monitoring Water Movement in the Vadose Zone , 2004 .

[21]  D. Urish,et al.  Electrical resistivity—hydraulic conductivity relationships in glacial outwash aquifers , 1981 .

[22]  L. Wilding,et al.  Overview of vertisols: characteristics and impacts on society. , 1996 .

[23]  M. Dabas,et al.  Soil resistivity: a non-invasive tool to map soil structure horizonation , 2000 .

[24]  L. Wilding,et al.  Vertisol genesis in a humid climate of the coastal plain of Texas, U.S.A. , 2004 .

[25]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Water Movement in Undisturbed Swelling Clay Soil , 1972 .

[26]  G. Richard,et al.  Electrical Resistivity Imaging for Detecting Soil Cracking at the Centimetric Scale , 2003 .

[27]  M. Wopereis,et al.  Water movement and soil swelling in a dry, cracked Vertisol , 1997 .

[28]  H. Boizard,et al.  Structural heterogeneity of the soil tilled layer as characterized by 2D electrical resistivity surveying , 2004 .

[29]  A. Sato,et al.  Three‐dimensional spatial and temporal monitoring of soil water content using electrical resistivity tomography , 2001 .

[30]  S. A. Hagrey,et al.  Resistivity and percolation study of preferential flow in vadose zone at Bokhorst, Germany , 1999 .

[31]  D. Goodrich,et al.  Soil moisture sensors for continuous monitoring , 1994 .

[32]  Lun-Tao Tong,et al.  Incorporation of topography into two-dimensional resistivity inversion , 1990 .

[33]  G. E. Archie The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics , 1942 .

[34]  Arthur W. Warrick,et al.  A Sensitivity Analysis of Electrical Resistivity Tomography Array Types Using Analytical Element Modeling , 2003 .

[35]  C. T. Hallmark,et al.  MACROPOROSITY AND INITIAL MOISTURE EFFECTS ON INFILTRATION RATES IN VERTISOLS AND VERTIC INTERGRADES , 1998 .

[36]  D. Hillel Environmental soil physics , 1998 .

[37]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe Ecohydrology: A hydrologic perspective of climate‐soil‐vegetation dynamies , 2000 .

[38]  R. Barker,et al.  Modelling the DC electrical response of fully and partially saturated Permo‐Triassic sandstone , 2006 .

[39]  R. Barker,et al.  Rapid least-squared inversion of apparent resisitivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method , 1996 .

[40]  T. Dahlin,et al.  A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays , 2004 .

[41]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Ground-penetrating radar for high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy , 1989 .

[42]  Herve Perroud,et al.  On the use of combined geophysical methods to assess water content and water conductivity of near-surface formations , 2002 .

[43]  Ugur Yaramanci,et al.  Use of block inversion in the 2-D interpretation of apparent resistivity data and its comparison with smooth inversion , 2000 .

[44]  David L. Alumbaugh,et al.  A geostatistically based inverse model for electrical resistivity surveys and its applications to vadose zone hydrology , 2002 .

[45]  J. D. Rhoades,et al.  Field Mapping Soil Conductivity to Delineate Dryland Saline Seeps with Four-electrode Technique 1 , 1976 .

[46]  William John McCarter,et al.  The electrical resistivity characteristics of compacted clays , 1984 .

[47]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Influence of natural time-dependent variations of electrical conductivity on DC resistivity measurements , 2004 .

[48]  Henry Lin,et al.  Hydropedology: Bridging Disciplines, Scales, and Data , 2003 .

[49]  S. W. Searcy,et al.  ESTIMATING SOIL PROFILE DEPTH WITH APPARENT ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY FOR A TEXAS VERTISOL , 2004 .

[50]  G. S. Dasog,et al.  Chapter 4 Soil morphology , 1996 .

[51]  Soil Survey of McLennan County, Texas , 2001 .

[52]  G. Richard,et al.  Electrical resistivity survey in soil science: a review . , 2005 .