Mitigation Measures for Exposure to Pesticides

Publisher Summary This chapter is an attempt to describe how EMMs can be developed and advocated more effectively by exposure assessors to assist their risk management in reducing the exposure(s) of concern. It focuses primarily on those EMMs used for the protection of agricultural workers and of individuals who may come in contact with pesticide residues inadvertently. It first identifies five elements fundamental to the development of pesticide EMMs, including evaluation for potential adverse health effects and the use of EMMs at a reasonable cost. In practice, regulatory scientists, especially those working at the exposure assessment end, are the ones that typically assist the risk management team in using exposure mitigation measures (EMMs) to reduce the exposure of concern. EMMs are simply controls, methods, tools, restrictions, or other actions taken by responsible authorities to (help) reduce the exposure(s) of concern. The chapter concludes with several real cases of pesticide EMMs used in the United States, including those used specifically in the state of California. The two cases particularly unique to handler exposures in California are the EMMs used for handler exposures to methyl bromide and EPTC (s-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate). For these two pesticides, other measures along with PPE and engineering controls were required in order to adequately comply with the mitigation requirements.

[1]  Bernard D. Goldstein Risk Characterization and the Red Book , 2003 .

[2]  Dieter Westphal,et al.  Uniform principles for safeguarding the health of workers re-entering crop growing areas after application of plant protection products. , 2000 .

[3]  D. Brouwer,et al.  CHAPTER 18 – Greenhouse and Mushroom House Exposure , 2001 .

[4]  R. C. Spear,et al.  Worker reentry into pesticide-treated crops. I. Procedure for the determination of dislodgable pesticide residues on foliage , 1977, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[5]  Calculated reentry interval for table grape harvesters working in California vineyards treated with methomyl , 1992, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[6]  Albert. Z. Wang,et al.  Environmental chemistry, ecotoxicity, and fate of lambda-cyhalothrin. , 2008, Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[7]  Thomas Thongsinthusak,et al.  Developing pesticide exposure mitigation strategies , 2007 .

[8]  A. Liebman,et al.  A Pilot Program Using Promotoras de Salud to Educate Farmworker Families About the Risks from Pesticide Exposure , 2007, Journal of agromedicine.

[9]  T Thongsinthusak,et al.  Assessing human exposures to pesticides. , 1992, Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[10]  C. Aprea,et al.  Biological monitoring of exposure to organophosphorus insecticides by assay of urinary alkyl phosphates: influence of protective measures during manual operations with treated plants , 1994, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[11]  S. Singer,et al.  Biphasic Dissipation Kinetics for Dislodgeable Foliar Residues in Estimating Postapplication Occupational Exposures to Endosulfan , 2004, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[12]  Penelope A. Fenner-Crisp,et al.  Risk Assessment and Risk Management: The Regulatory Process , 2010 .

[13]  W. F. Durham,et al.  Measurement of the exposure of workers to pesticides. , 1962, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[14]  D. Brouwer,et al.  Modeling re-entry exposure estimates : techniques and application rates , 2000 .

[15]  G. H. Willis,et al.  Pesticide persistence on foliage , 1987 .