Hydraulic engineering, a junior/senior-level course, is typically taught in a lecture-based format. Lecturing as a singular teaching technique has repeatedly been shown to be ineffective. Lecturing does not advance problem-solving skills, does not require creative or critical thinking, and does not prepare students for the types of problems they will face as professional engineers. In this study, two teaching techniques, problem-based learning (PBL) and cooperative learning (CL), were used to enhance learning in the hydraulic engineering course. The goals of PBL are to provide the student with an active role in learning and to allow the student to take responsibility for learning. The goals of CL are to have students work in teams, thereby learning from both each other and the instructor, and to teach students to work together cooperatively in small groups. Methods of developing teams, projects, and other assignments were explored. The course was assessed midterm and at the end of the semester. As a result, some changes were made midsemester and other recommendations are made for the future.
[1]
Joseph D. Hagman,et al.
Cooperative Learning: Effects of Task, Reward, and Group Size on Individual Achievement
,
1986
.
[2]
Roger T. Johnson,et al.
Impact of Cooperative-Team Learning on Performance and Retention of Navy Air-Traffic Controller Trainees
,
1989
.
[3]
C. R. Cosgrove,et al.
Assigning Students to Groups for Engineering Design Projects: A Comparison of Five Methods
,
1994
.
[4]
N. Mourtos.
The Nuts and Bolts of Cooperative Learning in Engineering
,
1997
.
[5]
Spencer P. Magleby,et al.
A Review of Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project‐Oriented Capstone Courses
,
1997
.