Interaction between prosody and intelligibility

In the lead article, Peppé (2009) provides a clear and detailed overview of prosody as it relates to the field of speech-language pathology, an often marginalized and misunderstood subject. Peppé makes a convincing case as to why speech-language pathologists should take notice of atypical prosody in the speech of their clients and provides an overview of current methods of documentation. Peppé also briefly notes that prosody can affect intelligibility and the purpose of this article is to expand upon this point. This article discusses current research on the effect of prosody on intelligibility in the speech of deaf individuals and individuals with neurological disorders. Research findings on acoustic dimensions of prosody and intelligibility are also examined. Finally, this article presents a case study of a child with highly unintelligible speech due to multiple articulatory errors. The child's appropriate use of intonation is examined in several examples as a possible factor that aids intelligibility. Based on the evidence provided in this case study, it is argued that further research is needed in order to determine what degree prosodic cues facilitate the intelligibility of disordered speech.

[1]  J. Ryalls,et al.  The effects of speech and language therapy for a case of dysarthria associated with Parkinson's disease. , 1992, European journal of disorders of communication : the journal of the College of Speech and Language Therapists, London.

[2]  G. Haycock The teaching of speech , 1942 .

[3]  Transcribing prosody , 2009 .

[4]  L L Elliott,et al.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  G. Weismer,et al.  The effects of a flattened fundamental frequency on intelligibility at the sentence level. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[6]  Sue Peppé Why is prosody in speech-language pathology so difficult? , 2009 .

[7]  J. M. Lenden,et al.  Prosody and voice characteristics of children with cochlear implants. , 2007, Journal of communication disorders.

[8]  M. Casby Otitis Media and Language Development: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[9]  N. Mcgarr,et al.  Pitch deviancy and intelligibility of deaf speech. , 1978, Journal of communication disorders.

[10]  Donald A. Robin,et al.  The role of callosal connections in speech prosody , 1988, Brain and Language.

[11]  H. Levitt,et al.  Prosodic feature reception and production in deaf children , 1974 .

[12]  B E Murdoch,et al.  Perceptual speech characteristics of dysarthric speakers following severe closed head injury. , 1994, Brain injury.

[13]  E. Ross,et al.  The aprosodias. Functional-anatomic organization of the affective components of language in the right hemisphere. , 1981, Archives of neurology.

[14]  Barbara Shapiro,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the control of speech prosody in propositional and affective contexts , 1985, Brain and Language.

[15]  R. B. Monsen Acoustic qualities of phonation in young hearing-impaired children. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Dominant language functions of the right hemisphere? Prosody and emotional gesturing. , 1979, Archives of neurology.

[17]  L. Hartelius,et al.  Clinical assessment of dysarthria: Performance on a dysarthria test by normal adult subjects, and by individuals with Parkinson's disease or with multiple sclerosis , 1993 .

[18]  J H Abbs,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of dysarthria associated with cerebellar disease. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  K. Yorkston,et al.  Ataxic dysarthria: treatment sequences based on intelligibility and prosodic considerations. , 1981, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[20]  J. Borod,et al.  A preliminary comparison of flat affect schizophrenics and brain-damaged patients on measures of affective processing. , 1989, Journal of communication disorders.

[21]  Marc S De Bodt,et al.  Intelligibility as a linear combination of dimensions in dysarthric speech. , 2002, Journal of communication disorders.

[22]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Dysarthria associated with traumatic brain injury: speaking rate and emphatic stress. , 2005, Journal of communication disorders.

[23]  E. Ross,et al.  How the brain integrates affective and propositional language into a unified behavioral function. Hypothesis based on clinicoanatomic evidence. , 1981, Archives of neurology.

[24]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Perceptuo-acoustic assessment of prosodic impairment in dysarthria , 2000, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[25]  H. Levitt,et al.  The effect of selected prosodic errors on the intelligibility of deaf speech. , 1978, Journal of communication disorders.

[26]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  The effects of flattening fundamental frequency contours on sentence intelligibility in speakers with dysarthria , 2001 .

[27]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Disturbances in prosody. A right-hemisphere contribution to language. , 1981, Archives of neurology.

[28]  Nicholas Schiavetti,et al.  1. Scaling procedures for the measurement of speech intelligibility , 1992 .

[29]  A Wingfield,et al.  Prosodic features and the intelligibility of accelerated speech: syntactic versus periodic segmentation. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[30]  Martha Danly,et al.  Speech prosody in Broca's aphasia , 1982, Brain and Language.