Comparative architectures of mammalian and chicken genomes reveal highly variable rates of genomic rearrangements across different lineages.

Molecular evolution studies are usually based on the analysis of individual genes and thus reflect only small-range variations in genomic sequences. A complementary approach is to study the evolutionary history of rearrangements in entire genomes based on the analysis of gene orders. The progress in whole genome sequencing provides an unprecedented level of detailed sequence data to infer genome rearrangements through comparative approaches. The comparative analysis of recently sequenced rodent genomes with the human genome revealed evidence for a larger number of rearrangements than previously thought and led to the reconstruction of the putative genomic architecture of the murid rodent ancestor, while the architecture of the ancestral mammalian genome and the rate of rearrangements in the human lineage remained unknown. Sequencing the chicken genome provides an opportunity to reconstruct the architecture of the ancestral mammalian genome by using chicken as an outgroup. Our analysis reveals a very low rate of rearrangements and, in particular, interchromosomal rearrangements in chicken, in the early mammalian ancestor, or in both. The suggested number of interchromosomal rearrangements between the mammalian ancestor and chicken, during an estimated 500 million years of evolution, only slightly exceeds the number of interchromosomal rearrangements that happened in the mouse lineage, over the course of about 87 million years.

[1]  J. V. Moran,et al.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. , 2001, Nature.

[2]  Tandy J. Warnow,et al.  A New Fast Heuristic for Computing the Breakpoint Phylogeny and Experimental Phylogenetic Analyses of Real and Synthetic Data , 2000, ISMB.

[3]  Lisa M. D'Souza,et al.  Genome sequence of the Brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution , 2004, Nature.

[4]  Pavel A. Pevzner,et al.  Transforming men into mice (polynomial algorithm for genomic distance problem) , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE 36th Annual Foundations of Computer Science.

[5]  Glenn Tesler,et al.  Efficient algorithms for multichromosomal genome rearrangements , 2002, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[6]  Thomas L. Madden,et al.  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  Colin N. Dewey,et al.  Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. , 2002 .

[8]  W. Murphy,et al.  Resolution of the Early Placental Mammal Radiation Using Bayesian Phylogenetics , 2001, Science.

[9]  S. O’Brien,et al.  A radiation hybrid map of the cat genome: implications for comparative mapping. , 2000, Genome research.

[10]  P. Pevzner,et al.  Genome rearrangements in mammalian evolution: lessons from human and mouse genomes. , 2003, Genome research.

[11]  Glenn Tesler,et al.  Reconstructing the genomic architecture of mammalian ancestors using multispecies comparative maps , 2003, Human Genomics.

[12]  P. Pevzner,et al.  Reconstructing the genomic architecture of ancestral mammals: lessons from human, mouse, and rat genomes. , 2004, Genome research.

[13]  D. Sankoff,et al.  Gene Order Breakpoint Evidence in Animal Mitochondrial Phylogeny , 1999, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[14]  P. Pevzner,et al.  Genome-scale evolution: reconstructing gene orders in the ancestral species. , 2002, Genome research.

[15]  D. Haussler,et al.  Aligning multiple genomic sequences with the threaded blockset aligner. , 2004, Genome research.

[16]  Johannes Müller,et al.  Molecular timescales and the fossil record: a paleontological perspective. , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[17]  Glenn Tesler,et al.  GRIMM: genome rearrangements web server , 2002, Bioinform..

[18]  J. Kadane,et al.  Bayesian phylogenetic inference from animal mitochondrial genome arrangements , 2002 .

[19]  S. O’Brien,et al.  Placental mammal diversification and the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  L. Froenicke,et al.  Reciprocal chromosome painting shows that squirrels, unlike murid rodents, have a highly conserved genome organization. , 2003, Genomics.

[21]  D. Haussler,et al.  Evolution's cauldron: Duplication, deletion, and rearrangement in the mouse and human genomes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Peer Bork,et al.  Comparative Genome and Proteome Analysis of Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster , 2002, Science.

[23]  P. Pevzner,et al.  Sorting by Reversals: Genome Rearrangements in Plant Organelles and Evolutionary History of X Chromosome , 1995 .

[24]  Jeffrey D. Palmer,et al.  Plant mitochondrial DNA evolved rapidly in structure, but slowly in sequence , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[25]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  Precision of molecular time estimates. , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[26]  D. Sankoff,et al.  Gene order comparisons for phylogenetic inference: evolution of the mitochondrial genome. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  S. O’Brien,et al.  The promise of comparative genomics in mammals. , 1999, Science.

[28]  D. Haussler,et al.  Human-mouse alignments with BLASTZ. , 2003, Genome research.